When will gold go back to $1,920 an ounce?

By Dominic Frisby Sep 18, 2012

Dominic Frisby

Share with
friends:

Comments (31) Print this article

I'm pleased to say that my sabbatical is now over.

I've finished the first draft of my book and I'm waiting with bated breath for my editor's feedback.

More on that another day. Right now, I’d like to get straight back into my favourite subject – gold.

You probably don’t need me to tell you that it's had a good summer.

But what happens now?

Gold is sticking to the plan

My big theme of the past year has been that gold has been in consolidation mode, and that we would not see new highs before this autumn at the earliest.

Gold made a mini-parabolic move last summer, which coincided with a panic (one of the many) over Greece. It finally spiked in September 2011 to $1,920 an ounce. It then corrected sharply by about 20% to $1,520, with many leveraged players losing their metaphorical shirts.

The move towards $1,920 saw all sorts of mainstream coverage. Yours truly even made it on to BBC Radio 2's Drivetime show. With the subsequent 20% fall, the clichés were dusted off. Gold, we were told, had 'lost its lustre' and the bull market was declared over.

But gold was simply doing what it has repeatedly done since this bull market began. It enjoys a run up, which might last some six or nine months and see gains of as much as 40% or 50%, then it trades sideways for a while, retracing some of the move up and consolidating at these higher prices. The length of the consolidation period usually reflects the magnitude of the previous run up.

You can see this illustrated in the chart below. For all the daily volatility, for all the squabbling, shouting and screaming, gold's rise over the last 12 years has actually been quite orderly.

The black line marks the upper reaches of gold's channel. The dotted blue lines show the periods from an intermediate high in gold before it breaks out to a new high. The dotted red lines show the shorter periods from an intermediate high to an intermediate low – which often occurs at the point of a previous high.

Gold price over the last 12 years

Gold's intermediate-term highs, most of them marked by the black line, have been at $293, $384, $430 and $450, $728, $1,033, $1,225 and $1,920. And each time it makes such a high, we go into consolidation mode - which is where we are now.

However, the period between intermediate-term high and low - as shown by the dotted red lines - is considerably shorter. And the good news is it looks like we've made our intermediate-term low now at $1,520.

Gold has re-tested that level three times now, and each time it has held. At the MoneyWeek conference back in May I was dribbling on about how important that number $1,520 is. I'm delighted to see it has held, as I hoped it would.

On this basis, we might still have several months before gold re-tests its old high at $1,920. I would also have thought it will take a few attempts to get through this level.

Then again, we might not. Gold, following the coat-tails of silver, is off on one of its runs again. It's gone through every level of resistance as though it wasn't there, rising every day by a percent or two (silver is actually up by over 20% in 30 days).

A marked acceleration came last week with Federal Reserve chief Ben Bernanke's latest announcement. When gold goes on one of these runs, nothing seems to stand in its way.


Compare the UK's leading gold brokers Gold

If you're interested in buying gold, our up-to-date directory of the foremost gold brokers and ETF funds makes essential reading.

Gold broker comparison table


Three reasons why gold might slip back in the short term

That said, here are three reasons we might expect some sort of short-term pullback for gold.

First, it is approaching a big line of resistance at just below the $1,800 mark, as shown by the red line on the next chart below.

Gold price since April 2011

Given the action we have seen since the end of July, I would wager that we are bound to see some kind of breather. There are so many traders who will have had such a good couple of months, profit taking is inevitable, even as soon as this week - on the stocks as well as the metals themselves.

Second, we always seem to see some kind of shake-out either in late September or early October. You can see this on Dimitri Speck's seasonal chart, shown below. (The chart basically shows that over the last 30 years, gold has generally had a fall during these months).

Seasonal gold price in the last 30 years

Third, there is a heck of a lot of bullish sentiment about gold and silver all of a sudden. Since the latest Fed announcement of apparently unlimited quantitative easing (QE), a number of people - many of whom I have great respect for - are declaring that “this is it”, “this is the beginning of the end-game”, “Von Mises' crack-up boom, here we come”, and the like.

("Crack-up boom" refers to the economist Ludwig Von Mises’ oft-quoted line: "There is no means of avoiding the final collapse of a boom brought about by credit expansion. The alternative is only whether the crisis should come sooner as the result of a voluntary abandonment of further credit expansion, or later as a final and total catastrophe of the currency system involved.")

If there is one thing I've learned, it's that this 'end-game' is going to be a lot longer in coming than most of us ever expect. (I thought it was coming in 2008). Markets can remain irrational a lot longer than you can remain solvent, and all that.

When you hear these kinds of pronouncements, it often pays not to listen to them. There's no doubt that the stances of the world’s central banks are extremely inflationary and bullish for gold, but the expectation for stimulus was, to at least a degree, priced in. Perhaps this is a moment to "sell the news".

To illustrate this excess of bullish sentiment, I'd like to show you a long-term chart of silver (see below). Underneath it is the 'relative strength index' (RSI), which compares the magnitude of recent gains compared to losses, in order to determine whether an asset is overbought or oversold. I have circled the RSI when it has reached similar levels to where we are today.

On a short-term basis, silver is overbought.

Silver price since 2003

Does this mean you should all run out and sell your gold and silver? Absolutely not. On a longer-term basis, the RSI is actually quite moderate.

But on a shorter-term basis, I would have thought some kind of shake-out is likely. But it will be like some short, sharp punch in the ribs. Enough to rattle everybody's nerves and cause a bit of pain. That's assuming it happens at all of course.

Longer-term, I stick with my big picture call. We are still in consolidation mode, but we are starting to head out of it. The worst of the correction is over. Some kind of wake-up punch might be coming, but I'm hoping to see those $1,920 highs in gold re-tested before the end of the year, with a new high next year well into the $2,000s.

I'll post some longer-term targets for this move in a future Money Morning. In the meantime, enjoy the ride.

And if you haven't already, check out my colleague Simon Popple's precious metals newsletter here.

• This article is taken from the free investment email Money Morning. Sign up to Money Morning here .

Our recommended articles for today

Beware of the trend – it won't last forever

As investors, we all have an inbuilt tendency to extrapolate the past into the future, assuming cyclical trends will go on for ever. This is a big mistake, says Merryn Somerset Webb.

A game-changer for the gold market

A recent deal between electronics conglomerate Samsung and London-listed Cluff Gold could be the start of something big for gold miners. Bengt Saelensminde explains how you can profit.

Comments (31)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Bob

    (18 September 2012, 11:10AM)  Complain about this comment

    A month ago the gold and silver bulls were suicidal over the metals. Now everyone is back to 3,000 dollar calls on gold and silver over 100 bucks. Something is not right here.

    I think both are good in the long-term but it would not surprise me to see a sizeable correction back down for both suddenly.

  • 2. JREwing

    (18 September 2012, 11:13AM)  Complain about this comment

    I would wager that the re-election of Barack Obama would be the most bullish thing yet for the Gold market. While I am cynical enough to not fall for any Republican claptrap about a "gold standard", the two parties do differ somewhat in rhetoric - with a smattering of hard moneyists in the Republican party and zero in the Democratic party. Ergo, an Obama re-election would remove any final hurdles to endless debt monetisation and further deficit financing. I fully expect US deficits to hit $2 Trillion and stay there forever, until the Dollar collapses (which could be a decade away).

    Of course, one could argue that a Republican hold over one of the two houses would restrain American spending - but the evidence from the last two years indicates otherwise. If the Dems take all three, then all bets are off. Gold could be at $3000 before people realise what has hit them.

  • 3. Neil

    (18 September 2012, 11:35AM)  Complain about this comment

    Welcome back, Dominic.

    Thanks for your timely article - I have been spending the time since the Fed statement to determine whether to top-up now or, having missed the recent run, wait a couple of weeks. However, I have never regretted buying more gold, but I have regretted not doing so.

    I am sure in a couple of years, people with look back with astonishment that gold could still be bought for less than $2000; but if that is anything like the last four years when gold could still be bought for less than $1000, it will seem a lifetime away.

  • 4. Tom B

    (18 September 2012, 11:46AM)  Complain about this comment

    Good to have you back Dominic and to read your clear and substantiated thinking.

  • 5. John

    (18 September 2012, 11:48AM)  Complain about this comment

    Good to see you back Dominic!
    Am very pleased I followed your and others' advice to buy gold and gold shares some time ago. The best insulation against, sadly, the incompetance of our politicians.

  • 6. Cooldude

    (18 September 2012, 12:03PM)  Complain about this comment

    Welcome back Dominic, looking forward to your book when it is printed. I think that we are into full on QE to infinity on a pretty much global scale. This extra debt will not solve any of our severe economic problems but it will debase the currencies at an increasing rate. This debasement and hopefully just the threat of war in the middle east will lead to fairly substantial rises in the price of gold and particularly silver. Way too conservative with your estimates imho and we should see all time highs in both metals in the next few months.

  • 7. Peter J.

    (18 September 2012, 12:30PM)  Complain about this comment

    Nice to have you back Dominic, we've missed you!

    Are you going to update us on your move in to the housing market?

  • 8. simon

    (18 September 2012, 12:38PM)  Complain about this comment

    Glad you are back, Dombo... As this mess starts accelerating, anything else will just be noise...

  • 9. Kingbingo

    (18 September 2012, 12:48PM)  Complain about this comment

    I had to sell my leveraged gold to buy a house, thank goodness I did not need to sell my physical gold as well. Once my personal balance sheet is looking healthy enough I think it’s time to go for the miners, a great way to get in on the action at a low price even when you miss the initial upwards moves of the underlying.

  • 10. HL

    (18 September 2012, 01:35PM)  Complain about this comment

    Welcome back, Dominic.

    What are your thoughts on the subject of confiscation ? Marc Faber believes that the US government (and perhaps others) will confiscate physical gold by law, as Roosevelt did in the 1930s, soon after gold's big spike begins.

    Tell us what you think. Soon.

  • 11. JREwing

    (18 September 2012, 02:20PM)  Complain about this comment

    @ HL - the British Government almost certainly will. At that point, all myths about UK property being a "safe haven" for the international jet-set will be blown the smithereens.

  • 12. Dave L

    (18 September 2012, 03:40PM)  Complain about this comment

    Good to have you back.
    Is the disparity between Gold and Gold Shares likely to be a lasting phenomenon or is Blackrock Gold and General likely to resume it's erstwhile stellar performance?
    Your observations would be appreciated

  • 13. Timbo

    (18 September 2012, 04:15PM)  Complain about this comment

    Dominic, i wonder if you could return to your predictions on gold stocks a while ago which are still cheap and, given the passage of time and production information, still worth buying..?

  • 14. Lucio Chiricozzi

    (18 September 2012, 05:22PM)  Complain about this comment


    Welcome back, Dominic.
    I missed your clever comments.

  • 15. Boris MacDonut

    (18 September 2012, 07:42PM)  Complain about this comment

    Same old MW tripe. House price crash pending. Buy Gold. Plus a series of posts form those who are cast iron sure of the future reassuring themselves they are right. Dominic is delighted that what he hoped for happened. At the time Dominic did not mention that hope was the mainstay of his Gold price conjectures. This article reads like a Daily Mirror horoscope.

  • 16. Matt

    (18 September 2012, 11:04PM)  Complain about this comment

    Anyone else find it wierd how few articles on where the gold price is heading there were recently on moneyweek before this collective sigh of relief?
    And please can you stop displaying charts with illegible axes?
    Like the way the first 'recommended' article below this is :
    Beware of the trend – it won't last forever

  • 17. Bob Conolly

    (19 September 2012, 04:08AM)  Complain about this comment

    It aint tripe or hope Boris.

    I was largely influenced by MW when I sold my apartment in Bournemouth in early 2007 for 190k GBP. Invested the lot in gold bullion and the value of my investment now stands well in excess of 500k GBP.

    BTW: Our old apartment is back on the market after being fully renovated for.................194k, what a great investment that was for the buyer of our former abode.....NOT !!!

  • 18. JREwing

    (19 September 2012, 06:02AM)  Complain about this comment

    @ Bob Conolly - But you can't go wrong with bricks and mortar!

  • 19. Bob Conolly

    (19 September 2012, 06:41AM)  Complain about this comment

    Lol JR

    In my case you can't go wrong with Gold Bricks and NO Mortgage !

  • 20. JREwing

    (19 September 2012, 11:01AM)  Complain about this comment

    @ Bob Conolly - Yours was a dream trade.

    The buyer of your former abode had the following "benefits" of bricks and mortar:

    (1) found his property going NOWHERE in value over 5 years - in Sterling, down 20 percent in US Dollars (which is also being inflated constantly - how about pricing that property in OIL? how big is the decline then?)

    (2) spent more money on renovations - money down the toilet

    (3) paid interest on the borrowed amount during that time (this may be lower than the rent but it depends on the area)

    (4) now has to find a buyer at effectively a major loss and even this may be a challenge.

    Debt - GDP in Britain is north of 1000 percent. Expecting property prices to appreciate at a general level (not talking about 1 Hyde Park here) after a 30 year massive credit bubble is nothing short of delusional.

  • 21. Halo

    (19 September 2012, 01:55PM)  Complain about this comment

    In the light of global currency competitive debasment what would be a suitable portfolio allocation for precious metals?
    I am 70 but like to take calculated risks and have over 30% of my curent portfolio in gold bullion and miners. How does this allocation compare with the average portfolio allocation?

  • 22. Boris MacDonut

    (19 September 2012, 05:13PM)  Complain about this comment

    #17RobCon. In the words of Victor Medrew, "I don't believe it". Well done, in the short term, you have done well. I'm not sure you tell the whole picture. Leaving aside any fees for selling up and for trading gold bullion you have had nowhere to live, so may well have incurred nearly 6 years of rental cost, anything up to £60,000. By my calculations if HP's rise just 25% in the next 10 years and you continue to rent you will only be quids in if Gold maintains a level of $1,600 an ounce or more. Given it was at $300 only 10 years ago you are taking a bigger risk than owning bricks....but fair play to the gambler in you. You probably have fewer sleepless nights when you read MW's uber Gold centric articles.
    10 years ago anyone could have written this about dumping gold and buying houses. What goes around.....

  • 23. JREwing

    (19 September 2012, 07:48PM)  Complain about this comment

    @ Boris - "Leaving aside any fees for selling up and for trading gold bullion you have had nowhere to live, so may well have incurred nearly 6 years of rental cost, anything up to £60,000"

    Only if the alternative is a zero deposit + zero interest mortgage.

  • 24. jr1987

    (19 September 2012, 08:36PM)  Complain about this comment

    great to see you back Dominic, great article as always spot on the money.

  • 25. Bob Conolly

    (20 September 2012, 03:36AM)  Complain about this comment

    No Gambling at all Boris - just shrewd investing.

    We sold or property at the top of the UK Bubble and converted to gold when it was still under 400 gbp per ounce while the price was still low.

    Yes I have rented ever since but who gives a toss considering the gains we have made. When you own a house you have to maintain the damn thing which is another expense we no longer have to deal with. I will sell our gold bullion once I know the worlds debt problems have been solved, but that day is still a long way off.

    We already have the cash saved to buy our next home (retirement) debt free in 5 years time. I will wager that in 5 years time house prices will be far lower than they are today. A bigger risk than bricks and mortar - yeah sure pull the other one.

    We have not a worry in the world thanks in large to the good folks at Money Week.

    Keep up the great work Dominic !

  • 26. Boris MacDonut

    (20 September 2012, 12:14PM)  Complain about this comment

    #24 Bob. I still think you are not being honest . The top of the HP bubble was in January 2008 not early 2007. The Gold price in early 2007 was $650 not under $400.. You'd have had at most £185,000 to invest which should now be worth about £430,000 if the price doesn't tail off dramatically. I'm guessing you moved somewhere similar at a rent of about £900 a month.
    HP's will rise. They should conservatively double in the next 30 years, so I would get on and buy one before you waste any more money renting. Well done anyway. You took a big gamble and so far it has worked. Like most gamblers I expect you don't mention your failures.

  • 27. JREwing

    (20 September 2012, 04:00PM)  Complain about this comment

    @ Boris - everything in life is a gamble except for house prices which always go up and cannot possibly ever go down.

    "The Gold price in early 2007 was $650 not under $400"

    He said 400 pounds not US Dollars. The current price is close to 1100 pounds per ounce.

  • 28. JREwing

    (20 September 2012, 04:03PM)  Complain about this comment

    @ Boris - "They should conservatively double in the next 30 years"

    That will be wonderful. But the price of bread will be up 20 times by then.

  • 29. Boris MacDonut

    (20 September 2012, 04:25PM)  Complain about this comment

    #27  JR. Apologies Bob. You indeed priced your gold in Pounds. The maths would be £185k of Gold at £400 in 2007, now trading at £1,075 an ounce is £497,000. Good work Bob and luckily for you not many others did likewise. At that rate you'll be back on here complaining about wealth taxes.

  • 30. Adam

    (25 September 2012, 01:57PM)  Complain about this comment

    This seems an odd discussion to me (Boris & Bob), slight hint of boasting aside. Surely, with 20/20 hindsight we can all say yes fantastic decision Bob. But its survival bias, as I believe they call it. It was a punt and you can post about it as it went well (congrats). See the other article on Gold to see discussion on "Gold Plan" (whatever that is for the opposite case).

    However, I made, much smaller but substantial for me, amount doing up a flat in London in a supposed bubble pop. I didn't put nearly as much in and the return multiple was not dissimilar. So, was that a fantastic idea? In hindsight...obviously. If it had gone south? Well, I could always live in it!

  • 31. Boris MacDonut

    (27 September 2012, 01:57PM)  Complain about this comment

    #25 Bob. Gold is at $1725 today. You just lost £7,000.

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


>