Why politics matters in emerging markets

By Cris Sholto Heaton May 17, 2010

Cris Sholto Heaton

Share with
friends:

Comments (6) Print this article

Let's talk politics. Last week, a fresh-faced, largely untested politician won a hard-fought race to run a country struggling with some pressing structural problems.

I'm not talking about Britain's general election. I'm talking about the battle to be the next president of the Philippines.

Here I'll take a look at what's been going on in one of Asia's most disappointing economies. Then we'll delve into a scandal in Indonesia, and catch up on the latest from Thailand…

Asia's leading laggard

More MoneyWeek Asia articles

Should you invest in the Philippines?
Thailand's woes aren't over
MoneyWeek Asia archive

The result of the Philippines 2010 presidential election isn't yet official. But there's little doubt that Beningo "Noynoy" Aquino has convincingly topped the polls (see chart below). All but one of his rivals has now conceded defeat.

But winning the vote will be the least of the challenges ahead for Aquino.

The Philippines' problems can be summed up in two charts. One is the country's high level of corruption. It's among the worst in Asia, as you can see below.

The other is the low level of investment. At under 15% of GDP, this is way below most of its regional peers and has been falling steadily for years (see below).

As I discussed in more detail here: Should you invest in the Philippines?, these factors explain why the country lags most of the rest of the region.

It's not down to a lack of resources. Huge reserves of minerals remain underexploited due to unhelpful laws, a lack of infrastructure and other factors that put off international mining investment. And there's no shortage of other selling points. For example, the English-speaking population has helped the outsourcing industry grow strongly in recent years.

The Philippines' woes are down to government incompetence; crony capitalism that only enriches a few powerful families; and high levels of political violence. These have left it as Asia's worst laggard.

So it's no wonder that investors have largely ignored the country. Stock market liquidity is low in all but a few major stocks. And it remains the only major Asian country that has no exchange-traded fund (ETF) to provide a cheap way into the market.

Progress will be slow at best

Can the new president turn things around? It's hard to say. Aquino doesn't have much of a record. He was propelled to the presidency largely by virtue of his family background. He is the son of Corazon Aquino (the first democratically elected president after dictator Ferdinand Marcos was toppled in 1986), and Benigno Aquino, another assassinated opponent of Marcos. After many low-key years in the legislature, Aquino's mother's death last year created a clamour for him to run for the top job, in the hope that he would come up to the same standard.

Aquino has pledged to do exactly what the country needs. That is, to clean up politics and improve investment. No-one seems to doubt his sincerity or personal honesty, sadly a rare thing in Philippines politics.

But it will still be a very tough job, particularly as his service to date shows little major success in these kinds of battles. Political and financial power remains entrenched in a few key families. For example, outgoing president Gloria Macapagal Arroyo made an immediate return to government as a senator, along with the former dictator Marcos's infamous widow Imelda. Party loyalties and civic duties are mostly meaningless. Most politicians align themselves at each election to secure the most patronage.

Still, even if a major step forward is a lot to ask, incremental progress might be possible. Arroyo's term, while surrounded by allegations of corruption, at least saw the public finances improve.

And in the long run, more help could come from an unlikely source. China, with its huge need for raw materials, is an obvious partner for such a resource-rich country, and a growing source of inbound investment.

The Philippines is by no means a core Asian investment. But if it makes progress, it could become interesting. Such a small and illiquid market is highly likely to develop into a bubble if foreign money begins to flow in.

Still, there's no hurry, which is lucky given the lack of investment options. I'm only aware of two dedicated funds (details are below). But even if you are interested in this potential turnaround story, I'd suggest waiting to see if a low-cost, easy-access ETF arrives in the next few months. Global X Management has registered one in the US, although this doesn't mean it will necessarily be launched.

FundTotal expense ratioMinimum
Open-end funds
Allianz RCM Philippines 2.14% $5,000
Lion Global Philippines 2.04% S$5,000

Political point-scoring in Indonesia

It's optimistic to expect Aquino to turn the Philippines around. But the right politician can certainly have a big impact. Take Indonesia. It has many of the same problems, but is clearly going in the right direction since the election of Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono as president in 2004.

Reforms have been slower than many would have liked. Yet the country has made enormous progress after emerging from the deep recession that followed the Asian crisis. GDP fell by over 13% in real terms in 1998, amid hyperinflation and a collapse in the value of the rupiah.

Now the financial system has been cleaned up to the point where Indonesian banks are a credible investment. The power of the established business families, while still strong, was weakened more than in any other post-crisis Southeast Asian country. And the political system – a dictatorship until 1998 - now seems to be a strong and improving democracy.

But it's never entirely smooth going in emerging markets, as a recent political storm shows. At the peak of the financial crisis in October 2008, the government decided to bail out the failing Bank Century at a cost of 6.7trn rupiah ($735m), warning that its collapse could create a run on the Indonesian banking system.

Opposition politicians have since claimed that the bail-out was illegal. Some have further alleged that some of the money made its way to Yudhoyono's re-election campaign or his allies. They demanded the resignation of Boediono, Yudhoyono's vice president, and Sri Mulyani Indrawati, the finance minister, who were involved in the bail-out decision.


Expert tips & advice for investing in Asia! Claim your FREE guides from MoneyWeek that include:

  • How to go about investing to Asia
  • Which brokers to use to buy foreign shares


There's no evidence so far to support these claims. The affair looks like political grandstanding. For some of those involved in supporting the charges, the goal is more about forestalling investigations into their own dodgy dealings or settling personal grudges, than cleaning Indonesian politics up. Both the ministers they have accused are highly regarded reformists. If the opposition succeeded in disgracing them, it would be a big victory for anti-reform figures and a huge blow to Yudhoyono's agenda.

Fortunately, that's unlikely. There will be a formal investigation, but the legislature was unable to pass specific charges against Boediono and Sri Mulyani. And the investigation will be carried out by the mostly independent and honest Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK).

However, it has already created problems. Sri Mulyani is leaving the cabinet to become a managing director at the World Bank. Her departure is a loss to Yudhoyono's reform programme, although the main candidates to replace her look sound.

Indonesia's economy is doing well – and so is the market

So a political relapse is now the main threat to an economy that is otherwise doing very well. GDP growth held up well during the crisis, with growth hitting 5.7% year-on-year in the first quarter. Investment is rising, consumer confidence is strong and bank lending is on the up (see chart below).

Politics could potentially undermine this. But it seems unlikely. Yudhoyono's approval ratings remain very high. The public largely agrees with moves to reform the system. There were widespread protests when corrupt officials tried to frame members of the KPK at the end of last year.

More recently, the attacks on his allies have encouraged the normally conciliatory, low-key president to take on his opponents more openly. That's encouraging. It could help force through further reforms. The resistance of the Indonesian old guard to his changes is more plainly self-serving than ever.

So far, investors remain mostly unconcerned. The Jakarta Composite is just 4% off its recent highs, in line with global reaction to the eurozone jitters. However, a major pull-back in the Indonesian market at some point seems likely. Stocks have come back very strongly over the last year. Indonesia is among the very few markets to top its pre-crisis levels.

The price/earnings ratio of 19 is not yet too stretched given the country's potential. But it's certainly not cheap anymore. However, it remains a sound long-term prospect. And it certainly hasn't fully entered the investment mainstream, which means we can expect more investors to move in.

The table below lists all the Indonesian funds that I'm aware of. A newly-launched Singapore-listed ETF from Deutsche Bank suggests interest is growing. The best ways to invest are either of the ETFs or the Aberdeen-managed closed-end Indonesia Fund, which is currently at a discount of 11% to net asset value.

FundTotal expense ratioListed
Exchange-traded funds
db x-trackers MSCI Indonesia 0.65% SG:XMIN
Van Exk Market Vectors Indonesia 0.68% US:IDX
Closed-end funds
Indonesia Fund 1.62% US:IF
Open-end fundsMinimum
Allianz RCM Indonesia 2.41% $5,000
Fidelity Funds Indonesia 2.04% $2,500

Thailand's crisis takes a bloody turn for the worse

Finally this week, the political situation in Thailand remains bloody and intractable. At least 30 people are said to have been killed by the army in recent days as they try to force out the red shirt movement occupying central Bangkok. (See my recent piece Thailand's woes aren't over for more)

The government is now going all in on this clampdown. It may pay off. It may set a clear precedent on how far protests can go and still be tolerated, It might roll back the swing towards anarchy that has resulted from the red shirts' blockade and the rival yellow shirts' occupation of the airports in December 2008.

But it could equally go horrifically wrong. The country has a long history of the army bloodily putting down protests – most recently in 1992.

One worrying factor is that it's become clearer in the last few weeks that there are multiple factions at work. Thaksin is being mentioned less frequently by the red shirts, indicating that other leaders have their own agendas.

Meanwhile, there are reports of feuds and struggles for influence between different army factions. A renegade general who supported the red shirts was killed. There are reports of army units firing on their peers. And then there's the appearance of masked gunmen – almost certainly special forces – apparently targeting senior officers for assassination during the peak of the violence. 

As I've said before, I can't view a tragedy like this as an investment opportunity, especially as I have friends caught in the middle of it. Still, I wouldn't be doing my job if I didn't point out that as long the country doesn't lurch into civil war, then the worse the situation gets, the more likely that rock bottom is close.

History suggests that investing at that time will be very profitable. Closed-end funds will almost certainly be the best option here. Low valuations in the market will be compounded by large discounts on the funds at the point of maximum fear.

A full list of funds of all types is below. My watchlist pick would be Aberdeen New Thai. It's currently on a discount to net asset value (NAV) of 16% (very large by its history), although either of the US-listed closed-end funds would probably work as well.

FundTotal expense ratioListed
Exchange-traded funds
iShares MSCI Thailand 0.63% US:THD
Closed-end funds
Aberdeen New Thai 1.80% LN:ANW
Thai Capital Fund 2.55% US:TF
Thai Fund 1.77% US:TTF
Open-end fundsMinimum
Allianz RCM Thailand 2.43% $5,000
Amundi Funds Thailand 2.13%
Fidelity Funds Thailand 1.99% $2,500
HSBC GIF Thailand 1.84% $5,000
JP Morgan JF Thailand 1.90%
Lion Global Thailand 1.68% S$5,000
Templeton Thailand 2.59% $2,500

This article is from MoneyWeek Asia, a FREE weekly email of investment ideas and news every Monday from MoneyWeek magazine, covering the world's fastest-developing and most exciting region. Sign up to MoneyWeek Asia here

Comments (6)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Tom F

    (17 May 2010, 10:45PM)  Complain about this comment

    Cris,

    Nice post again. Why doesn't the best MW writer have a blog on here?! it would be interesting to here your views on other economic issues apart from just Asia.

    The problem I see, looking at the Indonesian index and other EM indexes is the 'bubble' like characteristics of the graphs. Will the current highs be seen as a great buying opportunity in 10 years time or the top of a bubble that needs to deflate? it is hard to know! I am very weighted towards EMs and have been for the last 4-5 years. However I find it very hard to buy in at these levels.

    Marc Faber in his excellent book 'tomorrow's gold' (the greatest investment book ever written IMO) charts the history of emerging markets and the current EM graphs look like the top as he wrote then. Nonetheless he still buys the EM story currently so who knows (go 50% EM and 50% developed he says)!

  • 2. Tom F

    (17 May 2010, 10:46PM)  Complain about this comment

    Twist on your posts Cris, I would be interested to know your thoughts on the developed 'Western' markets.

    Are you buying/own any?! See any value or are we in the middle of a 15-20 year bear market that started in 2000?

    And what about your view on gilts? An awful investment as some of your colleagues think, or great as James Ferguson says?

    Deflation or Inflation?!!!

    Cheers.

  • 3. Cris Sholto Heaton

    (18 May 2010, 02:02PM)  Complain about this comment

    Thanks Tom. Yes, I agree some of the charts look like a bubble in recent years. I think the key difference is that they were coming off extremely low levels. For example, Indonesia was a mess post 1997 and most investors didn't want to go anywhere near it - it's been getting back on track for a decade but it's only in the last three-four years that investors have gone back.

    Valuations seem fair for an economy that - if reforms continue - can grow at 5-7% for a long time and see further improvements in corporate profitability on top of that, but clearly not cheap any more. Similarly, if we look at MSCI Asia ex Japan for a regional view, the price/book is around 1.85 - about average - fair but not cheap. So from these levels, the next couple of years could be a trudge, but I think the big EM bubble when everyone piles in is some way ahead of us.

  • 4. Cris Sholto Heaton

    (18 May 2010, 02:04PM)  Complain about this comment

    Developed markets - yes, I think that the bear market still has some years to run (at least in terms of valuations). There are good arguments for both deflation and inflation - I feel we could get deflationary pressure for a short while (already evident in the US, but not yet here), but there will be an effort to inflate our way out of it, whether it's successful or not.

    The problem with government bonds is that they are a binary bet. If we copy Japan, that's great for gilts. If we have 5% inflation again for a while, it's terrible. For me, the best option is high-quality low-debt large caps that are dominant in their markets, have pricing power, generally pay decent dividends - they can survive either. A lot of the EM-exposed stocks I mentioned last week fit with that.

    Blogging-wise, I did some at the start of the year, but recently I’ve been short of time and that was the easiest thing to drop. I might try to start up again later in the summer.

  • 5. John Sutton

    (18 May 2010, 03:18PM)  Complain about this comment

    For those of us who are not very familiar with the EM markets (especially Asian), how dependent are they on continuing smooth growth in China which now seems to be overheating?

  • 6. Cris Sholto Heaton

    (18 May 2010, 06:13PM)  Complain about this comment

    John, it varies, but most small emerging and developed markets are affected a lot by a handful of large economies – US, Europe and now China. The bigger domestically orientated EMs – eg India, Indonesia, Brazil etc – are less exposed directly, though there’s still sentiment, financial flows etc to take into account. So yes, a serious bust in China could mean widespread recessions and not just in emerging Asia, unless demand picks up elsewhere.

    The key thing with EMs is that they are volatile. Economies can suffer big recessions and then rebound quickly. Likewise their markets, so investing in them means taking the long view and being aware that large short run swings will happen.

    As for whether China is overheating – there are some signs that things are easing underneath the headline numbers. We need to watch what happens in property with the new measures coming in – that could slow a lot more than people expect.

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>