Funds: The booming 'dog' population

By James McKeigue Aug 03, 2012

James McKeigue

Share with
friends:

Comments (0) Print this article

You’d think, in a recession, that fund managers would be busy stepping up their game. But the latest report on ‘Dog Funds’ from wealth manager Bestinvest reveals the opposite. Bestinvest labels 133 funds ‘dogs’, up from 44 in the spring edition – that’s £26bn of investors’ money languishing in terrible funds. “The number of dogs has risen to a very worrying level,” says Adrian Lowcock, an adviser at Bestinvest.

To be fair to fund managers, anyone can underperform for a short while and that shouldn’t matter if long-term performance compensates. However, that’s just the problem, according to Bestinvest – it doesn’t. The group measures each fund’s performance for three years against its benchmark. If over that period a fund has underperformed by 10% or more, then they class it as a ‘dog’.

Leading the pack is fund manager Scottish Widows, which has ten dog funds. Other big names also feature, including Schroders, Fidelity, M&G and BlackRock. This is more than a little worrying, as these are some of the biggest fund managers on the planet. So how can you track down a good fund?

The main factor to watch is costs. If you invest, say, £10,000 over 20 years at an (optimistic) expected annual return of 7% with an annual management fee of 2.5%, you will end up around 20% worse off than someone who only pays 1.5% per year in fees. One way to keep costs down is to invest in trackers or exchange-traded funds that follow indices, rather than active funds that try to beat them.

If you’d rather pay for active investing (which can be worth doing if you find a fund manager you have faith in, or are looking at a particularly specialised market) then investment trusts often offer a better deal than unit trusts. However, due to the government’s Retail Distribution Review – a reform of industry fee structures that comes into force in 2013 – unit trusts are starting to drop their costs.

Even so, watch out for extras. ‘Ryanair-style pricing’, where fund managers add on hidden extras such as advisory fees or trading costs, can still be a problem. Ask about performance fees too, says Mark Dampier on Fund Web. Sometimes if a fund drops and then recovers you start paying a performance fee on the recovery, even though the long-term performance may be weak.

The bottom line is that you can’t control how your fund manager performs, but you can at least decide what you want to pay him.

Comments (0)

Share with
friends:

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>