It's time to sell the pound

By MoneyWeek Editor John Stepek Oct 02, 2012

John Stepek

Share with
friends:

Comments (17) Print this article

As the printing presses continue to churn around the world, who is benefiting from all this money printing and easy lending?

So far, the answer seems to be: ‘the banks’.

In both the US and the UK, central bankers are trying to lower funding costs for banks. If it’s cheaper for banks to borrow money, they should be keen to lend more. Instead, banks are merely using the cheap funding to boost their own profits.

There’s not much sign of the man on the street getting their hands on much of that central bank money.

However, there’s one key difference between the two countries that suggests the US will be more successful in boosting its economy than the UK – the state of the housing market...

America’s big advantage over the UK

It’s early days yet, but in the UK, the Bank of England’s ‘funding for lending’ scheme shows little sign of having much impact on borrowing costs for small businesses and individuals.

And in the US, the latest bout of quantitative easing http://www.moneyweek.com/qe  (‘QE infinity’, as it’s now known) has boosted banks’ profits on new mortgages, rather than cutting interest rates on home loans.

The Fed’s promise to keep buying mortgage-backed bonds has driven up the price of these bonds as investors pile into them. That means that banks creating new ones are suddenly making a much larger profit on them than they did before the Fed’s announcement.

But they’re not passing this profit on to customers in the form of lower loan costs. They’re just keeping the extra cash. That’s not necessarily what the Fed wants, says the FT.

“The extent to which QE3 drives down mortgage rates and helps homeowners or is pocketed by banks will be crucial to the success of the policy and the prospects for growth in the US and global economies next year.”

It sounds on the surface as though central banks in Britain and the US are grappling with similar problems. They want their freshly minted money to flow through to homeowners, individuals, and businesses. But those greedy banks are using it to boost their profits instead. Who could have guessed such a thing would happen?

However, there’s a critical difference between the situation in the US and the situation over here.


Sign up for a 3-week FREE trial of MoneyWeek
and get the following free as well

"The only financial publication I could not be without."
John Lang, Director, Tower Hill Associates Ltd


In the US, mortgage rates are already cheap. In fact, the average rate on a 30-year fix (they have those in the US) hit a record low of 3.4% this week. Yes, it would be lower “if banks passed on the full drop in their funding costs,” as the FT notes. But it’s still a pretty impressive deal by anyone’s standards.

More to the point, house prices have also been allowed to fall. By most measures, prices are now at or below fair value. So the US housing market is already well-positioned for a recovery. It doesn’t actually need QE infinity to recover. There may not be a fresh housing boom any time soon, but nor is a second devastating crash a huge threat.

That means the banks are free to use QE infinity to boost their own profits. And the more profit the banks make, the healthier their balance sheets will be. The healthier the banks feel, the more inclined they’ll be to lend.

In Britain on the other hand, the only thing that’s keeping the housing market afloat is the constant intervention of politicians and the Bank of England. Our entire political system currently seems bent on recreating another housing bubble.

First we had Nick Clegg’s stupid idea about raiding pensions to pay for deposits. Now Ed Balls is talking about how he’d use (as-yet-unrealised) profits from selling off 4G licences to fund a stamp duty tax break. The horrible truth is that our politicians understand only too well that the average British voter’s view of how the economy is doing, boils down to whether or not their house rose in value last month or not.

But this leaves us in a much worse position than over in the States. Banks don’t want to call in bad debts, because that would trash their balance sheets. But they don’t want to do more lending, because they know they have all this potential trouble stored up. So they’re still in retrenchment mode, with no real sign of light at the end of the tunnel.

The best way to play a stronger dollar

In short, while there are plenty of risks, the outlook for the US is healthier than the outlook for the UK. So how do you play this? The trouble is, the US stock market has priced in this sunnier outlook. Indeed, the market as a whole looks expensive, judged on long-term measures such as the cyclically-adjusted price/earnings ratio. So given that there are still plenty of hurdles along the way to recovery, we’d be wary of buying the US stock market at current levels.

However, one area where the US doesn’t look expensive is in the currency markets. The dollar hasn’t been hit as hard by the promise of QE infinity as you might expect. But it’s hardly been soaring ahead either.

If you’re comfortable with spread betting, you might want to short the pound against the dollar. The pound’s high for the year was just above $1.63. It’s now trading very close to that, at around $1.616. A short bet from here with sensibly-placed stop losses looks like it offers a decent balance of risk and reward.

Bear in mind of course, that with spread betting you can lose far more than your original stake. If this is the sort of thing you’re interested in, you should sign up for our free MoneyWeek Trader email to learn more about spread betting techniques.

If you’re not keen on the idea of spread betting, the good news is that you can profit from a stronger dollar anyway. Many of the UK-listed blue-chip dividend stocks that we’ve been recommending you hang on to earn significant levels of dollar revenues, and so benefit when the dollar strengthens.

• This article is taken from the free investment email Money Morning. Sign up to Money Morning here .

Follow John on Twitter || Google+ John Stepek

Our recommended articles for today

Why I look to the second hand market for the best deals

The City money men are flooding the corporate bond market with poor-value products, says Bengt Saelensminde. Here, he gives four reasons why you'll nearly always find better deals in the second hand market.

Cheap? Or cheap for a reason?

SUBSCRIBERS ONLY
Financial crises can wreak havoc with shares. So how can you tell the dud stocks from the bargain buys? Phil Oakley explains.

Comments (17)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Elvis Presley

    (02 October 2012, 11:35AM)  Complain about this comment

    When politicians took out wild bets on the housing market - Blair, Vaz, Mandy to name but a few, you have to wonder if they knew something other people did not. Is this not a form of insider dealing? At the very least they have a vested interest in favouring one part of the economy over another. Conflict of interest then?

    With regard to Vaz, is it not a little smelly, a socialist working like mad behind the scenes to make himself rich?

  • 2. Teresa

    (02 October 2012, 11:41AM)  Complain about this comment

    I don't understand our nation's obsession with continually inflating house prices. Bubbles in the property market are a distressing symptom of loose monetary policy. Money printing. Can somebody please explain why, as we helplessly watch our currency being debased and our earnings and savings eroded, we're supposed to be pleased that our housing is soaring ever further out of the reach of our children and grandchildren?
    Sod that for a game of soldiers.

  • 3. Chester

    (02 October 2012, 11:42AM)  Complain about this comment

    The US mortgage rate will be influenced more by the attitude of bond markets, rather than what Bernanke thinks he can engineer. 30 yr US yields have started to strengthen, and there will be a lot more pain to come in the US housing market

    Totally agree that the UK will be hit harder and faster thanks to political and CB interference, and that the US$ is an excellent counterplay to Sterling, but better still the Euro

  • 4. John

    (02 October 2012, 11:52AM)  Complain about this comment

    You recommend shorting the pound against the US Dollar but I can't understand your logic. Surely with the amount of US debt accumulated, and a never ending printing of money the dollar will inevitably collapse. One might even suspect this is exactly what Bernanke & co are trying to do in order to bring about a global currency commonly known as the CDS (Credit Default Swaps).

  • 5. HL

    (02 October 2012, 01:57PM)  Complain about this comment

    The phrase 'QE to infinity' signals our future.

    Throughout history, whenever politicians start debasing a currency, they find it extremely difficult to stop. Like riders on bikes without brakes, most of them find they can't stop until it's too late.

    Four Roman emperors tried and failed. Two German governments tried and failed. So did several Argentine and Brazilian presidents and, more recently, so did Zimbabwe. In each and every case, once started, the printing continued until the currency currency was worthless.

    Of course, it can't happen here. We've got safeguards and rules and regulators Best of all, we've got geniuses in charge. There's Dave and George and Vince and Mervin - and even Ed Balls waiting in the wings.

    What could go wrong ?

  • 6. JREwing

    (02 October 2012, 03:15PM)  Complain about this comment

    I sold all my pounds a long time ago. And I don't intend to buy any at any time in the near future.

  • 7. Orb

    (02 October 2012, 04:06PM)  Complain about this comment

    Dear MoneyWeek analysts,

    You've been predicting the rally of US$ for some time now. A cursory glance of the charts reveals the following:

    US$ Index: Pretty flat for the year (actually lower just now);
    AU$/US$ rate: Largely flat, but mostly in positive territory with the AU$ currently still stronger than the US$ for the year;
    US$/CAD rate: The US$ is markedly weaker for the year to date (3.7%) with just a few days in all where it was up against the looney at all.

    The GB£ auction today achieved an average i of 1.76% at 1.9x cover against the previous auction's results of 1.83% @ 1.8x cover.

    Then, as others have already pointed out, there's the US$'s QE Infinity...

    I'd say that while there's a good chance the £ will eventually lose to the US$, it may still be a while in waiting?

  • 8. JosephineK

    (02 October 2012, 04:17PM)  Complain about this comment

    There are some strange things going on in the UK. We keep getting told that interest-rates have been cut substantially but take a look at this from the economist Shaun Richards blog.

    "Still perhaps mortgage borrowers should feel grateful as overdraft rates are unchanged over the period and the cost of credit card borrowing has risen to over 18% according to the Bank of England. Just to avoid confusion this is over a period where the official base rate fell by 4.5% to 0.5%."

    We are being hit to give the banks yet another bail out I think

  • 9. J Cole

    (02 October 2012, 04:22PM)  Complain about this comment

    Save the Queen! Your recommendation to short the pound is outrageous. Call yourself an Englishman? That said, I think it might be wise to qualify the timing. Perhaps wait until agreement is reached on the size of next years budget cap for the US Government. I understand this is due to reach the headlines as part of the election battle over the next few weeks or so and had a negative impact on the USD last time it did so... All the best.

  • 10. JREwing

    (02 October 2012, 04:24PM)  Complain about this comment

    @ Chester - Remember that there are no private lenders in the US housing market any more. The Government is the only lender in town and it back-stops all mortgages. Interest rates may go up but if they are below the actual rate of inflation, house prices may not go down any further.

  • 11. Winston

    (03 October 2012, 04:51AM)  Complain about this comment

    There will always be an England!
    There will always be a pound.

    I don't trust the US Peso (formally known as the dollar) one bit.

  • 12. Dodge

    (03 October 2012, 12:10PM)  Complain about this comment

    given that it might take years for the UK housing market to crash properly, and that a rolling spread bet is very expensive, I'm not sure that a bet on GBP/USD is a good idea.

  • 13. Teresa

    (03 October 2012, 01:09PM)  Complain about this comment

    I've been massively short the pound for a couple of years now. And UK property.

    Why bet on horses in a glue factory? Precious metals are the place to be.

  • 14. NVP

    (04 October 2012, 09:42AM)  Complain about this comment

    On my own currency indicators (weekly setting) I see the GBP as Top dog in the big currency charts having had a great summer......I see USD still relatively in a slump.....having had a pretty poor Q3......If Equities stall and we get a sub >13,000 Dow in Q4 I am happy to support your call above

    but I wouldnt bet the house on it !

    NVP (Fxcorrelator.com)

  • 15. Orb

    (04 October 2012, 05:33PM)  Complain about this comment

    ...and today the US$ takes another hammering against the looney and its own index!!

    Anything to add John and MW analysts? Bengt will be happy to remind us gold's doing nicely!

  • 16. Paul

    (07 October 2012, 12:43PM)  Complain about this comment

    #1 - Politicians of the main parties are simply glove-puppet PR men...
    #2 - Spot on!
    #4 - Do you mean SDRs?
    #5 - We've been through this over 3000 times and I'm meant to believe that this time, even though the problems are bigger than ever before, for no particular reason they'll sort it.
    #6 - Me too!
    #9 - Going long would perpetuate a fraud that's been going on since 1694 and in high gear since 1811 (Carr vs Carr)
    #11 - What's the difference between USD and GBP. They're both elastic, fiduciary, fiat frauds.
    #12 - I wonder about that also...they're throwing the kitchen sink at property prices to keep them high - precisely the opposite of what we need.

  • 17. aff

    (08 October 2012, 01:45PM)  Complain about this comment

    There'll always be a pound!

    Maybe but I doubt it. Even if there always is a pound will its value always be the same?

    Gold on the other hand

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>