Fuel cells: the Holy Grail for green energy?

By Associate Editor David Stevenson Mar 19, 2010

David Stevenson

Share with
friends:

Comments (13) Print this article

The 'Holy Grail' of the energy world, says InvestmentU's Dave Fessler, is a resource that is clean, has no emissions and is cheap. But does such a resource exist?

The 'clean' and 'no emissions' parts are relatively simple: it's the cheap part that's elusive, he says. The trouble is, that's "the most important", too, with higher oil prices and more interest in alternative energy due to global warming. Solve the price conundrum and you can "kiss dirty coal and lofty oil prices goodbye".

Among green energy sources, solar and wind power have their supporters, while geothermal energy – extracting power from heat stored within the earth – could prove to be a major winner. But for the future Daddy of power production, you need to look elsewhere – at fuel cells.

These are electrochemical cells that convert a source fuel such as hydrogen into an electrical current. The idea is not exactly new – the principle was discovered by a German scientist and the first fuel cell demonstrated by Welsh scientist and barrister Sir William Robert Grove in 1839.

Update: French Connection

On 22 February we tipped bombed-out UK retailer French Connection (LSE: FCCN) at 31p as a high-value recovery stock. This week the company reported the sale of the Nicole Farhi brand and closure of its loss-making operations. So a return to profitability should happen quickly.

Although the shares have jumped to 47p on this welcome news, the long-term case for French Connection still looks sound, even taking account of disposal costs. The market cap is less than 25% of sales, while the net asset value (NAV) tots up to 74p per share. There's no debt: indeed almost half of the NAV is cash in the bank. So long-term investors should stay put. Short-term traders should take the 50% profit within two months off the table now.

Fuel cells are the classic clean energy source. You can run a car on one and the only emission would be pure water. So why haven't they taken off? In short, because of cost. Fuel-cell-makers must ensure they generate heat and power at least as efficiently as other conventional methods and at no greater expense. But a lack of technical know-how has hampered commercial applications – until now.

"Fuel cells have been too unreliable... and expensive to compete with conventional energy generation," says Tom Bulford in Red Hot Penny Shares. "The key to the advance of fuel cells is design and materials technology. Hydrogen fuel cells have been touted as the successor to the petrol engine. But the need for a network of hydrogen filling stations to match that of petrol stations has been a hurdle."

Yet progress is being made. Privately-owned Californian company Bloom Energy has developed the Bloom Box. Former Nasa scientist and chief executive KR Sridhar calls this as an "energy game-changer" and a "power plant in a box". Sridhar says one cell can power a light bulb, while 64 cells could light up a coffee shop. And "compared to the US national grid, this is about twice as efficient", he says. "If you use a renewable fuel, you're carbon neutral."

Although you can't get hold of shares in Bloom – for the moment, anyway – we look at below one of the sector's stocks that you can buy.

The best bet in the sector

Aim-quoted AFC Energy (LSE: AFC) makes alkaline-based fuel cells. And this Surrey–based business has "finally cracked it", says Bulford. "It's capitalised on global demand for clean coal by developing a low-cost, high-profit process. And it's close to making big money – potentially supplying some of the world's biggest industries."

AFC has applied its fuel-cell technology to the Underground Coal Gasification (UCG) gas removal process operated by Australian firm Linc Energy. This involves supplying its fuel cell systems and also receiving royalty payments from Linc from the sale of the electricity generated. AFC has also been working with Dutch chemical giant Akzo Nobel and Alter NRG Westinghouse, the world's largest producer of plasma torches, on other energy-generating technologies.

There are two snags. First, the market has cottoned onto AFC's potential, so the shares have risen from 15p to 23p in the last month alone. Second, this is a high-risk investment. The stock's market cap is just £35m and profitability could be some years away. But if you're prepared to take the plunge, the rewards could be massive. Allenby Research values AFC at some 33p a share, while – based on its UCG work – Bulford has pencilled in a 50p target price.

Comments (13)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. OPT1

    (19 March 2010, 04:19PM)  Complain about this comment

    Allenby's target for AFC is actually £1.37. NOT 37p as printed here.

  • 2. JAW

    (19 March 2010, 04:30PM)  Complain about this comment

    Fuel cells can never be used economically for transport because they are too heavy. Transport noise in cities, as well as pollution, is the factor that causes quality of life degradation. Petrol, diesel, hydrogen etc are based on controlled explosions which is ridiculous as a 21st century method of propulsion. Sanity says it must be an all electric car system. Nuclear fuel unethically asks 200,000 years of unborn future generations to guard the waste at their own cost. Uranium is not long term, it will run out in a century. Wind power is too intermittent, solar power panels last only 20 years and will create mountains of crystal waste. The moon will be with us for millions of years so tidal barrage electricity generation (not wave) is the only solution. The £18 billions spent on the Olympics could have paid for a Severn Estuary barrage creating 18% of UK electricity. Our priorities are wrong.

  • 3. Max

    (19 March 2010, 04:37PM)  Complain about this comment

    You can see the broker note here:

    http://www.afcenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/AFC-Energy-plc-AFC.L-Allenby-Capital-18-Mar-2010.pdf

  • 4. ste

    (19 March 2010, 04:55PM)  Complain about this comment

    not only was the allenby note valuing afc at £1.37 ... tom bulfords valuation was 50p short term and said it should be 10 times the share price at the time (15p) £1.50 over the course of the next year, and both of these were assuming afc took no further orders..
    moneyweek.. check ur facts..

  • 5. OPT1

    (19 March 2010, 08:25PM)  Complain about this comment

    Every time the press writes about something I understand, without fail they get it wrong... ergo is it safe to asume that every time the press writes something they get it wrong?

    Discuss......

  • 6. larryh

    (21 March 2010, 09:37PM)  Complain about this comment

    Fuel cells use a chemical process to produce electricity. They do not "explode" of make any kind of noise. Quite the opposite in fact. In the city where I live there is a small fleet of fuel cell powered ultra-modern 50-seat bendy-busses carrying passengers through the city day-in, day-out. You can recognise them from the steam flowing from a pipe on the roof. They are super quiet, and the electric power plant is no bigger than a normal diesel engine system.
    Long live fuel cells!

  • 7. David

    (24 March 2010, 01:29PM)  Complain about this comment

    I love this article: "Fuel cells are the classic clean energy source."

    What source would that be then? Didn't know they were an energy source as such. You must be talking about all those underground oceans of hydrogen just waiting for us to pump them out and use in fuel cells.

    In order to determine whether a technology or fuel source is viable we have to determine the energy balance or energy payback ratio. This is what your article is missing. What is the energy ratio of this technology? Where ER = Energy Ouput / Energy Input.

    This is not so much about clean energy. This is about fossil fuels closing in on the ER of 1:1. Yes, there's lots of oil, but what's the point if the energy ratio is 1:1.

  • 8. JAW

    (24 March 2010, 04:01PM)  Complain about this comment

    larryh - Agreed. Hydrogen combustion engines (based on explosions) are different from hydrogen fuel cell engines. The hydrogen in a fuel cell is not conventionally exploded. The hydrogen is oxidized at an anode, typically made of finely powdered platinum, and splits into a positively charged ion and a negatively charged electron which are separated such that the electrons pass along a wire creating the electrical current which drives an electric motor in the car. The ions pass through an electrolyte to the cathode (a catalyst typically made of nickel) reuniting with the electrons and together with oxygen produce water, which is exhausted. With nickel and platinum the costs are high, currently about $60 per kilowatt of power, and reducing those costs is going to be a serious problem.

  • 9. JAW

    (24 March 2010, 04:05PM)  Complain about this comment

    Hydrogen fuel cells have many technical problems: excess heat generated damaging the fuel cell, low amount of energy created per weight and volume of the cell, difficulty of using liquid hydrogen, inefficiencies in hydrogen production, difficulty of starting in freezing conditions, the inherent fragility of fuel cells which may not survive the bumps in many roads. Where will the hydrogen come from? It is not a naturally occurring fuel, but has to be produced using a pre-existing energy source, the conversion of which is only about 25% efficient. If that energy source is carbon based then what is the benefit? You would have to generate the hydrogen using renewable clean energy which is more expensive. Ford has abandoned its hydrogen car program to concentrate on electric cars, GM and Toyota have their doubts, whereas Honda sees them as a better long term bet than battery cars. Which companies shares are you going to bet on?

  • 10. Supermarine Blues

    (24 March 2010, 06:13PM)  Complain about this comment

    The Honda FCX Clarity fuel cell car is being leased to selected customers.

    Honda has also announced relatively affordable Solar powered H2 generators which could be installed at petrol stations, for example.

    Obviously, there is a drawback with those in the overcast UK and it will be a considerable time before relatively affordable becomes not outlandishly expensive.

    It's still therefore a very high-risk investment.

    But some of the doomsters sound like they might benefit from a bit more research!

  • 11. Simon

    (13 April 2010, 02:46PM)  Complain about this comment


    Check out Ceramic Fuel Cells listed on AIM.... a much better proposition than AFC; using natural gas we have a ready supply line already in every household. The fuel cell provides twice as much electricity as is needed by the average home so once credits are available the 'excess' can be fed back to the grid for a payment....oh and the biproduct - heat - is used to heat the central heating system.
    Not a long term solution in that it wont protect the next generation but it will mean the gas we have lasting longer and more efficiently as dirty inefficient power stations are phased out.

  • 12. LERENARD

    (24 April 2010, 02:30PM)  Complain about this comment


    It is a myth promoted and maintained by huge vested interests that there are no viable alternative energy technologies. What is less well known is the truth about alternatives that were discovered and developed by inventors and scientists such as Nicola Tesla and Victor Schauberger. Tesla developed and tested highly efficient electric motors whilst Schauberger developed implosion technology well before WW2. The alternative technologies were heavily suppressed by corporations and governments to protect vested interests and to appropriate some of the technology for covert and military use. Clearly vested interests and governments have much to lose if everybody in the world has free access to unlimited supplies of cheap energy. It is apparent in the world today that energy is being exploited in the same way as hunger.
    Time is running out. A modest investment in the 'right place' is all that is required.

  • 13. LERENARD

    (24 April 2010, 02:45PM)  Complain about this comment


    One of the 'right places' to look for the most promising alternatives at is www.theorionproject.org/en/index.html

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>