Join the rush for rare earth metals

By Senior Writer Eoin Gleeson Jul 30, 2010

Eoin Gleeson

Share with
friends:

Comments (19) Print this article

The conflict over rare earth metals has just hit Defcon 1. Having steadily reduced the supply of the metals for the last few years, China has just taken the shock decision to slash its rare earth exports for the rest of the year by 72%. Such a huge reduction in quotas means that official Chinese exports for 2010 are now well below global consumption. And that's a nightmare for Western industry.

Rare earth metals have emerged as an invaluable industrial resource in the last two years. Their weight and magnetic properties  make them ideal for the production of everything from electric vehicles to wind turbines to iPhones. A small quantity of dysprosium, for example, can make magnets in electric motors 90% lighter, while terbium can help cut the electricity usage of lights by 80%.

"Price hikes for many rare earth products have already been staggering this year," notes Mark Watts in Industrial Metals, with many metals doubling in value after a savage collapse in prices during the recession. The sudden shortage in supply now threatens to choke off the profits of a legion of green and consumer tech groups that depend on them. Meanwhile, the US authorities are planning to bring a trade case against the restrictions to the UN, according to Xiao Tu on Bloomberg. But the Chinese won't budge. The truth is that China badly needs to scale back its production of rare earth metals for a while, says Jack Lifton of Technology Metals Research.

Mining rare metals is a hugely destructive process, requiring large quantities of acid to separate the mix of metals found in each deposit. The Bayan Obo region – where most of the world's production of rare earth metals takes place – has been so badly damaged in recent years that a major clean-up operation now needs to be undertaken before mining can continue.

Besides, the Chinese no doubt feel they've no need to flog off such a strategic resource at today's lowly prices. Britain managed to run down its North Sea reserves at a time when oil was cheap. China may see no reason to do the same with rare earth metals. Ultimately, the whole point of seizing control of nearly 97% of the worlds' supply of rare earth metals was to force green tech and consumer manufacturers to set up in China – bringing a steady tide of high-paying jobs and taxes. China isn't about to bend to the will of Apple and Toyota just yet. That's why some unscrupulous Japanese firms have been smuggling rare earths from illegal mines across China, notes Jack Lifton.

Luckily, China isn't the only place you find rare earth metals. Dormant for 20 years, the Americans are moving to redevelop the massive Mountain Pass mine in California. Over the next two years, US miner Molycorp is looking to spend more than half a billion dollars upgrading equipment in an effort to ramp up production at the mine. Australian miners are even closer.

The world's largest known deposits, however, are to be found in an obscure and desolate outcrop of southern Greenland, says Nick Sudbury in the Zurich Club letter. Studies of the site show that the Ilimaussaq reserves would meet at least 25% of global rare earth demand for the next 50 years, says Leo Lewis in The Times. Extraction hasn't yet begun because Greenland only gained full sovereignty over its natural resources on 1 January this year. But the government has wasted no time granting exploration licences to miners looking to develop the resource.

The best bets in the sector

Rare earth metal stocks have been trashed over the last year. Initial excitement about the industrial rush to secure reserves floundered as the prices of the metals fell during the recession. We were worried at the time and urged readers to take profits (and a 143% return) in Australian miner Lynas Corp (ASX: LYC).

 

Lynas has fallen hard since. With the average rare earths composition of its Mount Weld recovering to pre-recession levels, this small miner is sitting on a very valuable resource again. The firm should start production in the third quarter of next year – offering the first significant source of new supply outside of China. A deal with China Non-Ferous metal was blocked. But Lynas completed an A$450m equity offering last October. It's a risky play, but one that could be very rewarding as China chokes off global industry.

However, Nick Sudbury prefers Greenland Minerals (ASX: GGG). It plans to use a sizeable deposit of uranium at its Kvanefjeld deposit in Greenland and has secured an exploration license. This project is at a very early stage, but is well worth keeping a close eye on.

This article was originally published in MoneyWeek magazine issue number 497 on 30 July 2010, and was available exclusively to magazine subscribers. To read more articles like this, ensure you don't miss a thing, and get instant access to all our premium content, subscribe to MoneyWeek magazine now and get your first three issues free.

Comments (19)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Roger

    (02 September 2010, 11:04AM)  Complain about this comment

    You missed last leg up in 2009. If people listen to you, they will probably miss this one in the next year or so maybe shorter.

    Trader's market or not, it is not as bullish as wild, it is not too bearish either.

    You stick to the big losser called Japan, and keep trying to talk down China because the running property "boom". But Chinese consumer staples and high techs are running wild at the moment, more than 70 company shares surpassed the 2007 peak (when index was 6400 compares to 2600 now), more than 30% of companies are within 10% of 2007 peak if you had patience as I did, many of my stocks bought in 2008 shortly after the crash (way from the bottoms yet) have now doubled and tripled, the portfolio is full of profitable positions when you look at the computer screen.

    There will be a crash coming in the future, sure, but not before a big bubble has been formed. Real estate is the only class that has serious problems at the moment.

  • 2. Roger

    (02 September 2010, 11:04AM)  Complain about this comment

    I am sorry this message is not for you but for the other article.

  • 3. David

    (02 September 2010, 11:50AM)  Complain about this comment

    Easier said than done. Execution only brokers like Share Centre or Hargreaves Lansdown don't seem to do Australia!

  • 4. Steve

    (02 September 2010, 02:25PM)  Complain about this comment

    David,

    TDWaterhouse do a good range of foreign markets, and they are cheaper than HL too.

  • 5. Dean

    (02 September 2010, 07:58PM)  Complain about this comment

    any body got any comments on selftrade. they worry me somewhat

  • 6. Derrick

    (06 September 2010, 10:53AM)  Complain about this comment

    After many years with selftrade i am moving because they unilaterally removed a share from my ISA because it was no longer on Crest. No warning or time for me to make other arrangements.
    My wife's account is with TD Waterhouse and we like them especially for dealing with foreign markets and you can trade in different currencies.

  • 7. gavin fielding

    (06 September 2010, 01:22PM)  Complain about this comment

    Hi Eoin,
    I absolutley buy into the rare metals story, but not necessarily the timing or the stock-picking. I bought after the Sept 2009 article, and hold Katanga mining and Neo Materials, I sold out Commerce resources. What is your view of these companies? currently worth about what I paid, or would you go for Lynas and Greenland. I accepted these are high risk but would welcome your view.

  • 8. Stuart

    (06 September 2010, 01:37PM)  Complain about this comment

    5. Dean - why do they worry you? I am interested in your comment as I have a reasonably large amount invested with them (Selftrade).

    If anyone would like exposure to LYC or GGG you can get exposure through IG Index spread betting. Don't exceed the size of your position just because you can / are leveraged though!

  • 9. Ian

    (06 September 2010, 06:11PM)  Complain about this comment

    Greenland Minerals have suspended their listing in Australia.
    No information available about this other than they have been in talks with the Greenland government. Maybe the government there is reluctant for the company to mine uranium which they intended to do in order to lower the cost of rare earth production. A case of watching developments to see what happens next with this one.

  • 10. Mike

    (06 September 2010, 07:18PM)  Complain about this comment

    There is another Rare Earth Company, and this one maybe nearer to production than Molycorp. It is called Great WesternMinerals, is on the Toronto Exchange, and so can go into an Isa.

    It has a mine to market philosophy which is promising (and part of the business is in UK).

    Worth a look? I should declare I have some in my Isa and have had them for a year or two.

  • 11. Phil

    (06 September 2010, 07:27PM)  Complain about this comment

    TD Waterhouse gives you access to foreign exchanges, but only cheaper on larger orders compared to Hargreaves and Lansdown. Prices for rare earth metals (REM's) should be strong for sometime, unless supply is increased to a high enough level compared to demand. The danger is that this could be made to happen and make it uneconomical for mines outside China to extract the metals concerned. China currently corner the market for REM's. If demand keeps increasing, I can only see the prices for REM's increasing as well. Lynas Corp were 11 cents a share at one stage.

  • 12. Julian

    (07 September 2010, 12:17PM)  Complain about this comment

    Greenland minerals are trading again. Greenland govt. have not yet decided to permit mining. I'd love to know which way the wind is blowing, that would make an article worth reading.

  • 13. beta_adjusted

    (07 September 2010, 12:53PM)  Complain about this comment

    Hmm, I've not looked recently but last I looked in Yen terms Japan had been a big outperformer. I did post to that effect some months ago.

    And on China, even more out of touch on this one, but not long ago the market was down 25% for the year? people I know in the industry suggesting things are not that rosy there either ... but I can't quantify that. We are still in the greatest financial crisis in more than 100 years, possibly in history unless you factor in major wars/collapse of empires. Moneyweek has a far better track record than 90% of the city. Perhaps because they are less conflicted; have a read of Geraint Anderson's City Boy and you will see what I mean.

  • 14. David

    (07 September 2010, 04:06PM)  Complain about this comment

    Thank you Steve and others. I am contacting T D Waterhouse.
    Regards

  • 15. Mike

    (10 September 2010, 06:44PM)  Complain about this comment

    So, the news looks really promising for GGG. Following your tip ( I was already watching also ) I bought ( via TDW ! ) as soon after the suspension was listed, and am now 70% up. However, I think this one is for the bottom drawer as it could be a game-changer over time.

    With the effective go-ahead, once in production, the Uranian extraction should cover all costs, even a t today's prices - so the profits from REMs will be FREE.

    Will probably buy more via the LSE when they list here as part of the pre-exploration fund raising - planned to be in Q1 2011.

    GL.

  • 16. Eoin Gleeson

    (17 September 2010, 11:18AM)  Complain about this comment

    Apologies for the delay in commenting here - I am just seeing these now.

    Yes, promising developments for GGG in the last two weeks. Developing the uranium deposit at Kvanefjeld will go a long way to financing the extraction the rare earth minerals. But still a tremendous amount of uncertainty surrounding this development.

    I first started writing about rare earths a couple of years ago, having read Jack Lifton - pretty much the authority on this subject. I'm sure those of you interested in the subject already follow his Technology Metals Research commentary:
    http://www.techmetalsresearch.com

    contd below....







  • 17. Eoin Gleeson

    (17 September 2010, 11:18AM)  Complain about this comment


    In terms of the race to produce rare earth metals outside China, Lynas looks to be making very good progress. It plans to bring the Mount Weld project and its processing plant in Malaysia into production by the third quarter of next year.

    And as Jack Lifton points out, over the next 5-10 years China will need to import the light rare earths - lanthanum and neodymium - to make up for shortfalls created by the leap in demand and reorganisation of its production. The light rare earths at Mount Weld put Lynas in a great position.

    Further out, he argues that it is he heavy rare earths that are of most strategic importance - because the Chinese domestic supply of these has only "five to thirty years remaining at present levels".

  • 18. Eoin Gleeson

    (17 September 2010, 12:10PM)  Complain about this comment

    Gavin - delighted to hear you share my enthusiasm for this story. Although obviously tantalum and cobalt don't enjoy the same near term prospects as REMs.

    Yo could point to a number of reasons. Prices have been volatile. Demand has not recovered as strongly as REMs. And China doesn't have a stranglehold on the supply.

    But long term, these metals are still key. You already know the demand story (http://www.moneyweek.com/investments/commodities/how-to-profit-from-the-scramble-for-technology-metals-453p19.aspx). It's the supply side that could make these interesting.

    The issue for tantalum, as you know, is that it was being sourced from militias in the DRC. With the US cracking down on "conflict metals", and the Talison mine currently out of commission (due to low prices), I think Commerce Resources still looks a good (if high risk) play on ethically sourced tantalum. Obviously, the key question is if Talison reopens.

    ....


  • 19. Eoin Gleeson

    (17 September 2010, 12:27PM)  Complain about this comment

    Equally, Katanga Mining could benefit from its cobalt deposit - though it is more of a copper play.

    The miner has suffered badly in recent years. Glencore now own about 75% of the company and could look to offload it to a Chinese company looking for cobalt. A high risk play. But it has fallen a long way since its liquidity problems in early 2009.

    I'm afraid I've never looked at Neo Materials.

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>