Profit from the American energy revolution

By MoneyWeek Editor John Stepek Apr 13, 2012

John Stepek

Share with
friends:

Comments (4) Print this article

Natural gas is dirt cheap – in America at least.

The US price of natural gas has just reached its lowest point in a decade. It’s now below $2 per million British thermal units (Btus).

That’s great news for any American who uses natural gas to heat their homes. Indeed, it’s helped to offset some of the pain US consumers have felt from rising petrol costs.

And in the long run, it’s fantastic news in general for the US. Who wouldn’t want a massive supply of cheap energy right on their doorstep?

However, it’s a real nightmare for the companies who get the stuff out of the ground. The share price of many natural gas producers has taken a hammering alongside the gas price.

But could now be a good time to buy?

The price of natural gas has collapsed

The price of natural gas is now so low that oil and gas companies in the US are converting their drilling rigs and vehicle fleets to run on it.

As Reuters reports, Canada’s Encana Corp “already has 15 of its more-than 40 rigs driven by gas”. Apparently, two years of fuel savings can cover the cost of converting from diesel to gas.

The chief executive of US oil and gas group Apache Corp, Steve Farris, recently argued: “What we need to do is increase the amount of natural gas demand in this country. From an economic standpoint, it’s a no-brainer.”

You can see why he’s desperate to boost demand. As you’ll probably know by now, new technology (hydraulic fracturing, or ‘fracking’) has freed up a huge amount of natural gas from once-hard-to-reach places in the US.

That’s been tough on gas producers. Supply has run well ahead of demand, and prices have toppled as a result.

However, this state of affairs will be temporary. You can’t create a source of reliable energy at a time when the oil price is over $100 a barrel, and expect it to remain cheap forever. We’ll look at what could turn things around in a moment.

But even with gas prices this cheap, there are ways for smart investors to profit.


Sign up for a 3-week FREE trial of MoneyWeek
and get the following free as well

"The only financial publication I could not be without."
John Lang, Director, Tower Hill Associates Ltd


Cashing in on the natural gas glut

One option is to get exposure to the US dollar in general. As James Ferguson pointed out in a recent issue of MoneyWeek magazine, the natural gas ‘glut’ is just one reason to expect the US dollar to strengthen sharply in the coming months and even years .

If the US has to import less energy, then that’ll be good for trade figures, and thus for the dollar. On top of that, sitting on top of a cheap source of energy bodes well for manufacturing in the country. Again, that could close the US trade gap.

We’ve mentioned ways to get exposure to the US in the past, both through US-listed companies and those in the UK that are heavily reliant on dollar revenues. Stock markets look like they’ll be wobbly for a few months, so you might get better opportunities to buy.

But one option to consider if you don’t already have it is pharma giant GlaxoSmithKline (LSE: GSK). It’s defensive, gets a lot of its revenues in dollars, and is in a popular sector right now – healthcare (which is the subject of the cover story in the current issue of MoneyWeek). For disclosure purposes, I will point out that I own shares in Glaxo in my personal portfolio.

Could the natural gas price be set to turn around?

What about natural gas producers themselves? I certainly think it’s worth taking a look at them. The fact is, natural gas prices can’t keep falling. Pinpointing the turnaround is impossible of course, but a lot of factors are coming together that could contribute to higher prices.

Environmental concerns about the impact of ‘fracking’ could stymie production. And it’s also possible that the producers have over-estimated the amount they can get from the fields.

But far more important than either of these issues is the fact that low prices are their own cure. With natural gas at these levels, there’s every incentive for the US to find ways to use more. There’s also plenty of incentive for producers to leave the gas in the ground where possible.

For example, US financial newspaper Barron’s likes the look of the afore-mentioned Encana (NYSE: ECA). Its share price has almost halved in the past 12 months, falling along with natural gas prices.

However, the company is now cutting its spending on ‘dry’ natural gas and looking to expand production of oil and ‘natural gas liquids’.  These liquids – which are normally produced alongside the gas – trade at about half the price of crude oil. So it’s a lot more profitable than the gas itself.

Encana has also been smart enough to hedge its exposure to falling prices. As Dimitra Defotis notes in Barron’s, more than half of the company’s 2012 production is hedged near $5.75 per Btu, well above the sub-$2 level natural gas is at just now. With the cost of production set to fall to $3 per Btu in the coming years, the company could do very well from even a modest recovery in gas prices.  

The company also pays a decent-sized dividend yield of around 4.4%. And as Defotis points out, it has a 30% stake in a liquefied natural gas (LNG) export facility on Canada’s west coast. This isn’t in operation yet, but when it is, it will be a starting point for shipping LNG to Asia, where gas prices are much higher than in the US.

It sounds an attractive play to us. Sure, gas prices might fall further, and it will be dragged down along with them. But at some point prices will recover, and Encana should still be around to take advantage when they do.

Meanwhile, in the next issue of MoneyWeek, my colleague Phil Oakley will be taking a close look at one of the biggest US natural gas producers – Chesapeake Energy – and telling us whether it’s time to buy or not. If you’re not already a subscriber, you can get your first three issues free here.

• This article is taken from the free investment email Money Morning. Sign up to Money Morning here .

Our recommended articles for today

John Law: the gambler who broke France

Those who would meddle with a nation's money supply to ward off default would do well to heed a warning from history. Seán Keyes looks at the troubled life of economist John Law.

The biggest emerging market story since China

After decades of international isolation, Myanmar is finally opening up. And with its strategic location, abundance of natural resources, and a large, cheap workforce, it has plenty to offer investors, says Lars Henriksson.

Comments (4)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Kelpie Capital

    (13 April 2012, 10:14AM)  Complain about this comment

    The best way to profit from the energy revolution may well be listed on our own index.
    Remember it was the people selling the picks and shovels during the gold rush who made the most, and the most consistent, profits.

    http://kelpie-capital.com/2012/04/06/the-weir-group-weir-l-drill-baby-drill/

  • 2. TK

    (13 April 2012, 10:39AM)  Complain about this comment

    At $5.25/BTU natural gas in USA works out at $19,600 kW/h - hardly cheap! I assume you mean $5.25/therm which is a million BTU, giving a kWh price of $0.0196
    As a financial website, you should always check your facts & your maths, being out by a factor of a million is no way to support your credibility.

  • 3. CG

    (14 April 2012, 09:23AM)  Complain about this comment

    TK, I'd point out that a therm is 100,000 Btu, not a million. An oft-used unit is the MMbtu, or million Btu, MM being the traditional US/UK oil&gas industry prefix for million (where M=thousand, squared). The usually quoted UK unit for trading gas is pence per therm, US it's $ per MMbtu

  • 4. Mark

    (16 April 2012, 04:51PM)  Complain about this comment

    I'm surprised that the article doesn't mention Gas to liquids (a way to turn cheap natural gas into premium synthtic fuels such as diesel) Shell's mammoth Pearl project is close to reaching full capacity in Qatar and there is huge interest in building GTL plants in the US, yet the article suggests the way to profit from the 'cheap gas' energy revolution in the US is to buy Glaxo Smithkline!

    There are 2 British companies leading the way in this field, operating in the small - medium scale GTL arena, Oxford Catalysts and CompactGTL. If the US really does have enough shale gas to keep prices low for decades to come, these guys will probably be the ones that really profit from the gas - oil price spread i reckon (as well as the natural gas resource owners)

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>