Lock in 7% per year until 2014

By Bengt Saelensminde Jan 30, 2012

Bengt Saelensminde

Share with
friends:

Comments (17) Print this article

On Friday, we looked at how to profit from the biggest non-event of all time.

The idea is that interest rates are set to remain low for the best part of three years. So far, the Fed’s talk of cheap money has been good for stocks and commodities. And that should continue.

But from where I’m sitting, a safer way of generating a good yield on our savings is with corporate bonds. And as promised, I’ve found another cracking bond deal for you today.

On a scale of risk, corporate bonds lie somewhere between cash and equity. Buying bonds, you take on a bit more risk than staying in cash. In return, you’re promised a higher return.

At the same time, as a bond investor, you’re not expected to take on the risks that equity holders face. That’s because when you buy a bond, your returns have been fixed in advance. The flipside is that we shouldn’t expect great capital growth with bonds. 

The bond I want to show you today currently promises a yield of about 7.35% over the next three years. Not bad during a time when the Fed says returns are in lockdown. And I’d say that in this financial environment it’s a good looking return.

At the end of 2014, you’ll either get your capital repaid (having pocketed 7.35% pa), or the interest rate on the bond will be reset and pay out the benchmark gilt rate plus 4.375%.

Sounds interesting?

Let’s take a closer look...

A great way to get serious income for the next three years

You probably remember, life in the financial markets was very different before the credit crunch set in. Back then, an investor might expect to make a reasonable return. Even if he was conservative and wanted to stay in cash, he’d be expecting some useful interest.

So when in 2004 the insurance group RSA (Royal & Sun Alliance) wanted to borrow cash from these conservative investors, they launched a bond promising 8.5% pa over ten years.

Come hell or high water (and credit crunch too!) RSA has paid the interest on those bonds. And there are still three years to run on it – right up until 8 December 2014.

The great thing is, because this bond is traded on the London Stock Exchange, you can buy it (second-hand) in the market.

MoneyWeek videos

Video tutorial: retail bondsWatch this before buying retail bonds
Tim Bennett on what you should know before you buy retail bonds.

Watch all of Tim's videos here

The bond I’m recommending today is the RSA Insurance Group 8.5% Perpetual Subordinated bond.

Now I said above that it’s paying 7.35%. But as you can see from the name, the nominal coupon is actually 8.5%.

The reason the interest you’ll get is less than 8.5% is that the bond is trading a little higher than par (ie the initial launch price). This makes the yield a little less.

Come 2014, RSA has the option (but not the obligation), to redeem the bond at par. And in today’s environment, you’ll be happy to have been getting over 7% in the meantime.

But what if RSA don’t redeem the bonds in 2014?

You may have also spotted that the bond has ‘perpetual’ in its title. So although RSA may pay back the loan in 2014, it can in fact keep it running in perpetuity – that is, forever!

But, of course, a lot can happen between now and forever. So management wrote in a couple of clauses to mitigate risk. First they can repay the bond in 2014. And if they choose not to repay, they can repay on every five-year anniversary (ie 2019, 2024, etc, etc).

Second, if they choose to keep the bond running, then the interest rate will reset to 4.375% plus whatever the benchmark gilt is paying.

Now remember, back when this bond was launched, bond investors still wanted a decent yield. And 4.375% over the gilt rate is a handy return. Compared to other investments today, 4.375% looks pretty good.

Even if the benchmark gilt rate stays at today’s paltry 2%, then you’ll be getting over 6% on this bond (2% plus 4.375%).

And think about the potential advantage this offers you over more conventional bonds. With most bonds, there is no re-set. If you buy a 30-year bond (by no means uncommon) with a fixed coupon of 5%, then that’s what you’ll get for the next 30 years. Whatever happens to rates over the next 30 years, you’re stuck with your 5% interest rate.

But with the RSA bond, if interest rates storm upwards, then your interest will reset to 4.375% over the benchmark gilt.

Of course, RSA can always pay you off early, at one of the five-yearly reviews. But hey... at least you should get your money back with a good return in the interim.


Report FREE report: Two ways to turn Europe's crisis into an opportunity

  • Reveals the true level and extent of the European financial crisis and what this means for your money.

  • Details actions Bengt recommends to protect your wealth and profit from the impending gloom.


Some important risks for you to consider

As with any investment, it’s important to think about risks. I said earlier that I believe bonds are a safer bet than stocks. But they are not risk-free.

RSA’s history stretches back to the 18th century. It’s been around a long time and it’s grown into a massive global enterprise.

Being a financial company, it’s heavily regulated and needs to stick to certain capital requirements. That means it has to have a strong balance sheet. As of the last accounts, it’s got £1.3bn, which is more than double what the regulators demand. Just to put that figure into perspective, the bond issue (or loan) I’m talking about is for £450m. So, technically, RSA could pay this bond back immediately from its reserves.

But we shouldn’t be complacent. This is an insurance company, after all. They can have bad years, and may need to draw down on their capital buffer. Remember, too, that insurance companies hold massive investment portfolios. In this case, it’s got £13.5bn in financial assets (most of it in high-grade bonds). If the financial markets turn down, then it’ll eat into RSAs capital buffer. Put simply, a financial crash could tear into its balance sheet.

But looking on the bright side, during the 2008 downturn, RSA kept up interest payments on this bond. Even though, technically, it had the right to defer interest – that is delay payments so it could sort out its finances – it didn’t.

If it comes to it, it would be more likely that the equity holders take a hit. First dividends and then, if things are really bad, equity holders could be asked to pony up cash in the form of a rights issue.

Then again, if it does turn out really bad, the bondholders could suffer too. This is a ‘subordinated bond’ – that means that if the company goes bust, holders will be behind ‘guaranteed creditors’ in the queue when it comes to getting their money back. Ahead of shareholders, yes, but behind preferential creditors.

Three reasons I like this bond

All in all, I like this bond. It’s got some features that are useful as part of an overall diversified portfolio.

First off, it’s got almost three years to run, with coupons paying out over 7% pa.

Second, it’s got the potential of making holders more than 4% over the average government gilt in perpetuity.

Third, if RSA chooses to keep the bond running, then you’ve got the benefit of interest rate resets that keep your bonds tied to prevailing interest rates (albeit on a five-year review).

As with all the bonds I recommend, you can always sell them if you need to get hold of your cash. That’s more than can be said for much of the other fixed rate bond offerings on the high street.

But please do remember, you don’t get owt for nowt. There are no guarantees with these bonds. There’s undoubtedly more risk involved than cash in the bank, and if you wanted to sell your bonds in the market, you may not get back your full investment.

Overall, I’d say the risk/reward balance is in our favour with this one – especially when it’s part of a diversified portfolio. If you’ve got a bit of cash that you’d like to be paying you a decent fixed interest over the next three years, this could be a great option.

Action to take: BUY RSA Insurance Group 8.5% Perpetual Subordinated bond

In case you’re new to this, let me give you a couple of tips on buying bonds. Not all stockbrokers allow you to trade retail bonds. If yours doesn’t, check out MoneyWeek’s broker comparison page to find one that will.

And as with most of these retail bonds, you can only buy this one in multiples of 1,000 with a minimum investment of £1,000. You can get more information on the bond on the London Stock Exchange website.

 RSA Insurance Group 8.5% Perpetual Subordinated bond

RSA Insurance Group 8.5% Perpetual Subordinated bond

ISIN: XS0197028714
Currency: UK sterling
Current price: 104p
Minimum investment: £1,000
Further details: London Stock Exchange
Five-year performance: 2007 -2.12% | 2008 -29.08% | 2009 +10.08% | 2010 +6.35% | 2011 +18.35%

• This article is taken from the free investment email The Right side. Sign up to The Right Side here.

Important Information
Your capital is at risk when you invest in shares - you can lose some or all of your money, so never risk more than you can afford to lose. Always seek personal advice if you are unsure about the suitability of any investment. Past performance and forecasts are not reliable indicators of future results. Commissions, fees and other charges can reduce returns from investments. Profits from share dealing are a form of income and subject to taxation. Tax treatment depends on individual circumstances and may be subject to change in the future. Please note that there will be no follow up to recommendations in The Right Side.

Managing Editor: Frank Hemsley. The Right Side is a regulated product issued by Fleet Street Publications Ltd.

Fleet Street Publications Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. FSA No 115234. http://www.fsa.gov.uk/register/home.do

Comments (17)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. JL

    (30 January 2012, 05:31PM)  Complain about this comment

    I like the bond direction you've taken, but isn't this misleading? You don't, for some reason, take into account the capital loss if the bond is called in 2014. In that case, the return will only be approx. 6.8%, not 7.3%. I'm no expert but think this is roughly right. You didn't mention this on other bonds recommended either.
    Have I got this right? If yes, then why? Can anyone advise.

  • 2. WoodyWoodpecker

    (30 January 2012, 06:03PM)  Complain about this comment

    In this article, as in previous ones, you rightly stress the importance of having a diversified portfolio of bonds. It would therefore be very helpful to see an example of such a porfolio so that readers knew the minimum number of holdings and the different redemption dates and levels of risk you would recommend.

  • 3. bengt

    (30 January 2012, 06:46PM)  Complain about this comment

    JL
    You're quite right, there will be a capital loss on redemption. As mentioned in the article, you'll have to pay above par for these bonds and that'll bring your effective interest rate down.

    The way to get round this issue is to use a Gross Redemption Yield (GRY) as your interest rate. That includes any capital loss (gain) as well as interest received.

    I used the mid-price of the bond (£1.025) and came up with a GRY of 7.35%.

    The running yield is higher - but as you say if you include the capital loss if the bond is called, then 7.35% (as quoted) is fairer.

    It all depends on what price you pay for the bond. Use a decent stockbroker and a bit of timing and you'll get the figure quoted.

    Bengt

  • 4. nick evans

    (30 January 2012, 09:07PM)  Complain about this comment

    thanks for the insight Bengt.

    I just wondered what does the price of £1.04 mean? Is that the price of a bond and in order to have the miniumum investment (£1000) you would need to buy roughly 1000 units? Sorry to sound like a dunce.

    Also, bit offtopic but in these times where investors are more concerned about Return Of Capital as opposed to Return On Capital, I was wondering if you could do set of articles (similar to your Diversified Portfolio series) to how to go about easily stockpiling foreign currency.
    I remember you talked a while back about stockpiling the NOK but since you are a Norwegian Native that is pretty straightforward for you obviously. But what about the rest of us who are not domciled in Norway or other. Is there a simpler way to hold foreign currency reserves to hedge against what looks like an increasingly weaker pound in the future?

  • 5. Peter Robertson

    (31 January 2012, 08:55AM)  Complain about this comment

    Investors should be aware that subordiated bonds such as RSA's rank one notch above equity and during periods of stock market volatily have a tendancy to behave more like equities or preference shares, rather than lower volatily (bullet redemption) bonds. It is very easy to be seduced by the high coupon and the 'yield to call' (the yield to redemption is the yield to call in this case) but as was seen between 2007 and 2007, the price of the RSA note did not price off its yield like traditional bonds. Unlike investment grade bonds, its price was not supported by a decent spread over interest rates. Note the price decline from peak to trough was about 33%, pretty much the same as the decline in RSA's share price. 'Solid' is not a word that I would personally use to describe any subordinated debt.

  • 6. Peter Robertson

    (31 January 2012, 09:01AM)  Complain about this comment

    between 2007 and 2009

  • 7. Bob Blakeman

    (31 January 2012, 10:02AM)  Complain about this comment

    On the basis of this article I decided for the first time to add corporate bonds to my portfolio and have purchased 5000 RSA perpetual at £1.035. A bit naive maybe, but surprised to be informed by my broker that I have to pay £66.04 interest to the seller as part of my settlement fee. Don't recall this being mentioned in any of the Tim Bennett videos or beginners. Presumably if I choose to sell at any time, there will be an interest sum payable to me.

  • 8. O Byrne

    (31 January 2012, 11:19AM)  Complain about this comment

    Bob - As a first time retail bond buyer I was surprised by this too. I bought today and had to pay for 57 days' interest. The dealer explained that this was because when quoting (i got 104p) the market gives a 'clean' price and that this 57 days interest will be returned to me with the normal interest payments.

    Bengt - thanks for the tip, i have been interested in investing in the retail bond market since they opened it up but was unsure where to go given all the choice. Its probably worth explaining about the upfornt interest payment in future articles, as for us retail bond novices it was a bit of a surprise.

  • 9. Maryg

    (31 January 2012, 01:01PM)  Complain about this comment

    Can this bond be held in an ISA?

  • 10. Ian Allison

    (31 January 2012, 01:12PM)  Complain about this comment

    Bengt,
    Thank you for your article on Bonds, investments that up to now, I hadn't considered.

    I recently bought the minimum number of Enterprise Inns 6.5% 2018 bonds. Based upon that experience, may I be so bold as to correct a minor error in your articles that just possibly, may cause some confusion to first-time bond investors.

    Using Enterprise Inns bonds as an example, I bought the minimum 1000 bonds at 70p for a total cost of £700 + commission + 42 days of interest due to the previous owner.

    Please explain if I am wrong but ignoring commission and interest, the minimum investment at that time was £700 i.e. 1000 x 70p.

    To my mind, the nominal value of £1000 only means something if I hold the bonds to maturity.

  • 11. K Sheppard

    (31 January 2012, 01:57PM)  Complain about this comment

    I am still slightly struggling with the logic of your maths here. At best, allowing for the Bid and Offer spread, you are going to pick this bond up for around £1.04. It would appear that the initial bond price was £0.90. If RSA decide to return the capital at the end of 2014, that allows for three potential interest payments of 8.5%. Surely, in the simplest terms you are potentially gaining 25.5% of interest but losing close to 16% as a capital loss, Doesn't that suggest that is this case you are only gaining about 3%, or so, per annum interest.

    Clearly if the bond runs on, this doesn't apply and the build up of interest (albeit at a potentially lower rate) gradually becomes the dominant factor and the return gained improves from the 3% or so!

    Please explain Bengt, if I have got this wrong.

  • 12. JeffC

    (31 January 2012, 02:57PM)  Complain about this comment

    Moody's rating on this is currently Baa1.
    That means according to Mood'y "Issuers or issues rated Baa.nn represent average creditworthiness relative to other domestic issuers".
    Further into their site in a table called " Moody’s Idealized Default Probability Table" it gives a rate of default for this rating level of 0.83% in year 4 going out to 2.6% in year 10.
    Mind you these are the same guys that possibly over-rated a whole lot of supposedly investment grade bonds leading up to the financial meltdown.

  • 13. Peter Robertson

    (31 January 2012, 05:13PM)  Complain about this comment

    @K Sheppard:

    If you buy the bond today, you pay £104. If we assume the bond is to be called in Dec 2014 (which is not certain), you get 8.5% interest pa but you lose approximately 1.33% in capital pa (the difference between £104 and £100 divided by 3 years). so your overall 'total return' reduces down to 7.17% (the combination of income and capital loss). The bond was actually issued at a price of 99.48 in 2004.

    But do refer to my comments in 5 above. There is no obligation on RSA to call this bond in 2014 (they might but they might not) and in the interim, these subordinated notes can display equity like volatility when equity markets (and financial stocks decline). They are not without risk (just look at the price chart above!)

  • 14. K.Sheppard

    (31 January 2012, 07:31PM)  Complain about this comment

    @ Peter Robinson

    Thanks for your comments Peter. I had also managed to a locate the 99.48p information, so my earlier concerns were inaccurate about c3% returns. However, my maths logic was similar to yours.

    Your point about volatility is a very good one, suggesting that, there will surely be a better entry point to this investment within the next 6 months!

    That is a point which didn't really come out in the piece above, namely timing your entry. However, surely the closer we get to 2014, the closer the price will equate to 99.48p, baring the uncertainty about it rolling forward.

  • 15. Jtemplar

    (31 January 2012, 10:02PM)  Complain about this comment

    I would think of it is a perp you can buy into the isa and I would also suggest that you need to to avoid income tax on the coupon, after all to a 40 or 50% taxpayer that 7 % coupon getting halved looks less attractive.
    Bengt I like the series on bonds but would you not agree that outside an ISA they are not particularly tax efficient so unless one has a large isa pot it is a struggle to build a bond ladder as you suggest?

  • 16. JeffC

    (01 February 2012, 09:11AM)  Complain about this comment

    So lets assume that RSA do not call it in 2014 and interest rates have started to edge up. The bond should be trading around par but I assume the price will then jump once the market is informed that RSA will not be repaying and the interest rate is adjusted (upwards as benchmark now higher if general interest rate has moved up).

    Price quoted on LSE site is currently 105 to buy.

  • 17. Peter Churchman

    (01 February 2012, 08:11PM)  Complain about this comment

    My online broker Td Waterhouse doesn't seem able to quote a price for this Bond...it doesn't appear at all in its list of UK Bonds. Anyone have any suggestions for an alternative channel that doesn't require opening yet another account?

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>