Why high yield stocks are the best bet right now

By Associate Editor David Stevenson Aug 27, 2010

David Stevenson

Share with
friends:

Comments (18) Print this article

Share price falls aren't bad news for everyone. If you're trying to get a decent income from your investments, these days the stock market is one of the better places to look for it.

Savings rates on bank deposits are mainly rubbish. While ten-year gilts are only paying you a measly 3%. But, following its latest fall to a near seven-week low, the FTSE 100 index is now offering an average dividend yield of 3.6%.

What's more, plenty of high-quality UK stocks yield quite a bit more than this. And that's just in the short run. Looking longer term, there's another plus point with high yielders. If you want to make the most of your money in the market, dividends are by far the number-one key factor.

So here we look at how you can boost your dividend income – and your overall investment return as well.

The case for buying unpopular stocks

Buying high yielding stocks is all about fashion. Or rather, it's about the exact opposite.

We've written about this before, so here's just a quick re-cap. A high yield is saying that a stock has fallen right out of favour with investors.

In other words, they're not happy to buy it unless they can extract a much higher-than-average dividend payout from it. Chances are, the stock has become pretty cheap in price to earnings (p/e) terms, too.

This can happen for one or more reasons. Sometimes high-yielders are in sectors the market just doesn't like. Maybe there was a question mark over whether the dividend would be paid in full. Or perhaps there's always been a stigma about the company concerned.

But here's where a great opportunity can arise for investors who are prepared to take a contrarian view.

By buying when a share is unloved and cheap, you can lock in a tasty yield straightaway. Then at some stage in the future, you may find you've made a chunky profit too. That's as and when the market becomes keen on the stock once again.

Of course, most of the time, the payout is the only tangible thing you get from holding a share. Yet many people have no idea how much dividends add to the overall amount of money they can make.

Dividends are crucial for long-term returns

Author and GMO investment manager James Montier sums this up in his latest newsletter. "To those who charge around trying to guess the next quarter's make believe earnings number, the concept of dividends seems wholly irrelevant", he says. "But dividends are a vital element of return."

"Looking at the US market since 1871, on average over the very long-term, dividends have accounted for some 90% of the total return", he says. It's a similar story on this side of the Atlantic. "In Europe, 80% to 100% of the total returns achieved since 1970 have come from dividends (combining yield and real dividend growth)".

Although that 'up to 100%' bit is rather a stunner. It means that, in some European markets, almost all the long-term money that's been made has been down to dividend payments.

For me, that makes dividends a no brainer. High yield stocks that are steadily upping their payouts are a 'must have' part of any long-term portfolio.

Even better, when markets fall, high yield stocks tend to do better than the rest. That's because a decent payout level can help to protect a share price when times get tougher. As the chart below indicates.

The FTSE high yield index currently pays out just over 5%. The blue line shows the relative performance of this index compared with the FTSE 100 (in red). For much of the last three years, this relative has been almost a mirror image of the main UK blue chip barometer.

In other words, while the FTSE 100 has recently dropped back, high yielders have started outperforming again.


Source: Bloomberg

Yet, as Montier says – without pulling any punches – the market is still completely missing the point on the dividend front. As he puts it, "dividends have fallen out of favour with CEO as well as 'investors' – although it pains me to use that term for the seeming ADHD-afflicted speculators who dominate the investment scene today".

So the current 'churn and burn' attitude is providing a contrarian buying opportunity. At some point many of today's high yielders will return to favour. When that happens, investors who are prepared to snap them up at today's depressed prices will be quids in.

What to buy

What are the best big-dividend paying stocks to buy right now? If you're a regular Money Morning reader you'll know that over the last year we've come up with a steady stream of high yield tips.

For today, I'll mention just one, with a way of finding more. Morgan Stanley's European team have put together a list of stocks with "high and secure dividend yields". Among the biggest UK blue chips, just about top of the bill comes British American Tobacco (LN: BATS).

Sure, it makes cigarettes, and that's not to everyone's taste. But from an investment viewpoint, BAT looks a good bet. Despite churning out ever-growing amounts of cash, the stock is standing on a current year p/e of just 12.7 and a prospective yield of 5.1%. Further, Morgan Stanley is forecasting almost 9% dividend growth in 2011.

As for more ideas, my colleague Stephen Bland has developed a long-term investment strategy called the 'High Yield Portfolio' (HYP). The aim of the HYP strategy is to build a portoflio of UK shares that will pay out large dividends forever – no matter what happens to the markets.

If you'd like more information on starting a subscription to Stephen's The Dividend Letter newsletter, please call our customer service Team on 020 7633 3609.

Our recommended article for today

The best way to play nuclear power

Nuclear power is staging something of a comeback as the world demands more energy and lower carbon emissions. James McKeigue examines the industry and picks the best way to invest in nuclear energy.

• The Dividend Letter is a regulated product issued by MoneyWeek Ltd.

Comments (18)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. lumino

    (27 August 2010, 11:15AM)  Complain about this comment

    Strange how the MoneyWeek magazine says that they don't believe in stock-picking (they prefer asset allocation), but then every day or two its writers do exactly that. In the "high-yield" stakes the standard stock pick was BP up until recently. Hmm... if only there were some kind of cheap product that could allow private investors to track a whole range of large-cap companies (thus reducing individual company risk) who on average paid, say, about 3.5% divis...

  • 2. Midge

    (27 August 2010, 11:27AM)  Complain about this comment

    I appreciate the free e-mail which MW posts dailey.But I do wonder if any other readers get information whether paid for or not which is worth it.Are any of these news sheets advertised asking for a few hundred pounds or so worth there costs?Perhaps others have their own ideas which have been successful.Please let us know.

  • 3. koen

    (27 August 2010, 11:32AM)  Complain about this comment

    Ishares has 3 Dividend etf's. Asia Pacific Dividend30 pays 4.5%, Euro dividend30 4.2% and UK dividend30 4.85%

  • 4. Don

    (27 August 2010, 12:30PM)  Complain about this comment

    Koen - do you know what the tax treatment is for those dividend ETFs? If the dividends are rolled back into the fund, increasing its value, do you pay CGT, or are the dividends paid out to shareholders in the ETF in the form of dividends, and therefore income? I basically want to avoid paying income tax, whilst getting the benefit of a dividend-oriented investment.

    Thanks

  • 5. RVS

    (27 August 2010, 01:10PM)  Complain about this comment

    Don,
    You might find the following link helpfull
    http://uk.ishares.com/en/rc/stream/pdf/false/publish/repository/documents/en/downloads/brochure_accumulating_funds_en.pdf
    Basically, the gains in the value of accumulating funds are taxed as income.
    The income from distribution funds are paid as dividends and so subject to income tax, but the gain in the value of the fund will be subject to CGT.
    I couldn't find ishares UK dividend30, but they have the following distribution fund
    iShares FTSE UK Dividend Plus
    "iShares FTSE UK Dividend Plus is an exchange traded fund (ETF) that aims to track the performance of the FTSE UK Dividend+ Index as closely as possible. The ETF invests in physical index securities. The FTSE UK Dividend+ Index offers exposure to the 50 highest yielding UK stocks within the universe of the FTSE 350 Index, excluding investment trusts. "

  • 6. Bob Roberts

    (27 August 2010, 01:58PM)  Complain about this comment

    A few months ago it was BP - just before BP destroyed life in the Gulf, last week it was the evil regime of Zimbabwe and today it is BAT.

    I am so close to cancelling my MW subscription. What next - blood diamonds?

  • 7. Nel

    (27 August 2010, 04:48PM)  Complain about this comment

    David Stevenson - what of Paul Hill write up in 28th May MW where BATS was Turkey of the Week sell at £20.06?
    I know MW individuals have their own views but where's the sense in this extreme variation?

  • 8. Jeff

    (27 August 2010, 09:16PM)  Complain about this comment

    After having being poisoned by other people who CHOOSE TO SMOKE in pubs & other buildings for many years, I feel it's only right for me to take some dividends from this sector of the market.

    If they choose to smoke, why shouldn't I choose to profit from it?

  • 9. Bob Roberts

    (28 August 2010, 08:16PM)  Complain about this comment

    Human Beings have to make choices - hopefully moral ones.

    Why not invest in prostitution as that is a big money winner? Get involved in the import of women into the UK who are then forced to work in brothels. That is a good earner according to the papers.

    Why not some child slavery whilst you are at it?

    Tobacco companies are targetting the likes of China, India, etc, as they see a huge market potential there. Most of those countries do not have anywhere near the regulations on advertising of the real dangers of smoking that we have here in the UK.

    I suppose if you can sleep at night and look yourself in the mirror each morning then invest in whatever makes you money. I suspect, in time, that nagging voice at the back of your mind will get louder though. Terrible thing when it emerges eventually - guilt.

  • 10. John Demetriou

    (28 August 2010, 09:27PM)  Complain about this comment

    Bob

    Child slavery is wrong, immoral and illegal, because it directly infringes the liberty of the individual for whom there is no choice.

    The same applies to forced prostitution.

    BP - Well, that will make you a hypocrite to start with. What, you don't drive? You don't wear clothes that were made using oil?

    Doubt it somehow. I don't like oil and I think the West should stop being so dependent on it, but for the time being, it is a crucial, all important product. You can't say that because it is 'immoral' no-one should invest in it.

    Your point on tobacco is ridiculous. No-one forces anyone to smoke. It is a choice, pure and simple.

    You've arrogantly come along and decided third world people are too ignorant to make their minds up on their own.

    You are a typical dogmatic liberal, one who enjoys loftily telling people what is right and what is wrong and how they should be, live, spend and how they mightn't sleep at night.

  • 11. dean

    (31 August 2010, 02:03PM)  Complain about this comment

    Paul Hill is a joke. Where he gets his info from is beyond me. I subscribed for 2 years and quit 7k down. If you want to hold on to your capital, avoid him.

  • 12. Jon

    (02 September 2010, 10:47AM)  Complain about this comment

    That's strange Dean - I've subscribed for 3 yrs and I'm 269k up - must be the timing

  • 13. Alan

    (02 September 2010, 11:05AM)  Complain about this comment

    Have to agree with some earlier postings, sick of being bombarded with e-mails asking to join x,y,z share picker for £'00. MW does seem to have los its way.....I'm also wondering if its worth paying for to be honest.

  • 14. Grumpy Old Man

    (02 September 2010, 11:35AM)  Complain about this comment

    Became completely disillusioned with MW and their continual gloom some time ago and cancelled my subscription.
    Wow,Jon....can you tell us how you did it with Paul Hill's tips?I alaways meant to keep a record of how they performed,but couldn't be bothered!
    I quickly read some of the Money Morning E-mails,but they are so contradictory from day to day and as for Dominic Frisby....I may be a bit thick, but I haven't got a clue what he is banging on about!

  • 15. Ian

    (02 September 2010, 12:27PM)  Complain about this comment

    7. Nel.
    "David Stevenson - what of Paul Hill write up in 28th May MW where BATS was Turkey of the Week sell at £20.06?
    I know MW individuals have their own views but where's the sense in this extreme variation?"

    Paul Hill is about trading - buy low, sell high. No real interest in dividends.

    The article here was about dividends. As a high yield stock BATS is pretty hard to beat.

    So I don't think David's comment and Paul's comment contradict each other. They just have different required outcomes. Paul = growth. David = income.

  • 16. Doom and Gloom

    (02 September 2010, 12:30PM)  Complain about this comment

    Grumpy Old Man

    I did bother to track Paul Hill's tips for a year in the heady days of 2006/07. Overall the 'turkeys' performed better than the 'tips.' Turkeys included Michael Page (+69%); Reuters (+69% also); Sainsbury's (+49%); Alliance Boots (+46%); Reckit Benkiser (+31%). Of the tips , only Tanfield (a spectacular +507%) and Touchstone (+38%) made comparable gains over the period.

    With all these 'tipsheets we should remember that every 100 subscribers bring in about £40k a year for the tipster (and presumably MW get a percentage). In other words, it's a nice little earner. I suppose I'd feel happier if a tipster would honestly say 'nothing worth investing in at present' and only tip where there is a real conviction that this is the company and the time right time to invest in it rather than give a tip because the magazine is expecting one.

  • 17. Jon

    (02 September 2010, 01:25PM)  Complain about this comment

    Grumpy Old man

    Actually it wasn't Paul Hill's tips but mostly Dominic Frisby! In fact I forgot to include profits taken, so the total sum to date has been 332k or more importantly over 100% growth. The serious point though is that individual tips often have the upside priced in by the time you get to hear about them, so caveat emptor. However I do think that MW has got the macro investment picture spot on in the time I have been subscribing.

  • 18. Doom and Gloom

    (03 September 2010, 10:02AM)  Complain about this comment

    Jon
    you are quite right re much of the upside having already occurred by the time you see a tip; often, though, the price will fall back to a more attractive buying level after the initial euphoria.

    On the dividend front, will CEOs see the ultra low interest rate environment as an opportunity to peg or even reduce divis? I suppose much will depend on what they have in mind for any additional retained profits!

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>