Rolls-Royce: a great British success story

By Phil Oakley Feb 09, 2012

1

Share with
friends:

Comments (2) Print this article

Everything looks rosy for Rolls-Royce. The company has just posted record profits, and has a record order book to match. Small wonder shares are close to all-time highs. The big question now is: is it time for existing shareholders to sell up and take their profits or can we expect even greater things from Rolls-Royce in the future?

There’s no question that the 2011 results are Rolls-Royce’s best ever. Revenues grew by 4% to £11.3bn, while profits before tax jumped 21% to £1.16bn. The dividend was raised by 9% to 17.5p per share. And at the year-end, Rolls-Royce had a record order book of £62.2bn – more than five years’ sales at current activity levels.

Over the last decade, the company has doubled is revenues, while profits are up almost fivefold. So it’s reasonable to ask: can things get any better?

The answer is: it looks like they probably can.

Let’s look at what’s driving the growth first of all. The top-performing unit was civil aerospace, with profits up 27%. This is also where the bulk of Rolls-Royce’s orders come from. It received £11bn of fresh orders in 2011 with strong demand from emerging markets. This saw the order book grow by 7% to £52bn – nearly ten times current sales.

Notable new orders include an exclusive deal for Rolls-Royce’s Trent XWB engines to power Airbus’ fuel efficient A350-1000 planes. This division looks well placed to grow its profits in the years ahead.

Rols Royce share price

Meanwhile, defence profits grew by 22%, while marine and energy profits declined. The outlook for the defence unit this year is more uncertain, given the weak finances of many governments. That said, profits are still expected to grow slightly in 2012. The marine and energy businesses are more subdued, but Rolls-Royce’s joint ownership of German diesel-engine maker Tognum should prove helpful going forward.

A very attractive business model

One of the main reasons to like Rolls-Royce is the way it makes money. Across its four main business units, there are currently around 60,000 installed Rolls-Royce engines across the world. These engines have working lives of 30 years, but require regular servicing and maintenance.

Servicing is much more profitable than making and selling engines, as it has fewer associated overhead costs. Given the company’s large order book and long-term service agreements with customers, this revenue stream looks set to grow strongly. Profits and margins should expand as well.

But should you buy the shares?

Buying close to all-time highs is rarely a good idea. And a lot of good news is already reflected in Rolls-Royce’s share price. The fundamental support for the business looks very good, with management looking to double revenues again during the next decade.

However, at 750p, the shares trade on 14 times 2012 consensus earnings forecasts, and offer a dividend yield of 2.6%. Although the company is only paying out about a third of its profits, this does not look great value to us.

The shares have seen some profit taking this morning, but we’d like to see a bit more before buying the shares. Below 700p, they look a good long-term investment.

Comments (2)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Antony

    (09 February 2012, 03:13PM)  Complain about this comment

    You always end up paying more of a premium for quality than you initially would like to. A bottle of Ch. Lafite is priced as it is partly for the exquisite contents of the bottle and partly because buyers attach a premium to its value based upon long-term performance and being consistently the best performer in its class. The same equation applies: Rolls-Royce + best in class = pay up!

  • 2. 4caster

    (10 February 2012, 09:10PM)  Complain about this comment

    Antony, you're paying a premium on the share price just for Rolls Royce's iconic name. Its long term performance is no better than that of Royal Bank of Scotland. In 1971, the escalating development costs of the RB211 engine bankrupted it; Heath's Conservative government had little choice but to nationalise it. Rolls Royce Motors was spun off in 1973, and Thatcher privatised the aircraft engine division again in 1987. Some say the recent Trent engine's development costs put Rolls Royce under similar financial pressure for a time. I am optimistic about Rolls Royce's future profitability, but would not pay a penny extra for the name. Nor would I pay extra for Chateau Lafite, when Lidl’s Comte de Brismard (recently £10.99) came equal top in a Which? taste test.

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>