Home Retail Group’s results are awful: but is this an opportunity?

By Phil Oakley May 02, 2012

Phil Oakley

Share with
friends:

Comments (7) Print this article

Home Retail Group’s (LSE:HOME) full year results are shocking.

The profit collapse at both Argos and Homebase clearly shows the pain being felt by many high street retailers. The fact that no final dividend has been declared is a further kick in the teeth for shareholders.

HRG is not in danger of going out of business just yet, but you can certainly understand why its long-term survival might be in question. It’s not surprising that the shares have fallen sharply today.

In fact, they’ve fallen so far that there’s the possibility of an interesting investment opportunity starting to emerge here.

Let’s take a closer look.

What’s behind Home Retail Group's woes?

Profit collapse at Argos and Homebase

Argos and Homebase profits

Profits at Argos have fallen off a cliff. They are down 57% on the back of an 8.9% fall in underlying sales. Most of this is down to a sharp fall in the sales of electronics goods such as TVs. Homebase’s sales have only fallen by 2%, but profits have more than halved.

Both these businesses face lots of problems at the same time. Consumers haven’t got a lot of money to spend, and when they are spending, they are increasingly doing it online.

But perhaps HRG’s biggest problem is that it has to bear the cost of 748 Argos and 341 Homebase stores. The rent on these stores is £363m a year. Total operating costs are £1.9bn. Selling fewer goods means it becomes harder to cover these costs. This is why profits fall much faster than sales do. Its big fixed costs mean that HRG has what is known as very high ‘operational gearing’. This can be deadly in a business with falling sales.

Does Argos have a future? It’s difficult to write off a business that still has £3.9bn of sales, but it’s going to have to change – and fast. To survive, it’s going to have to turn itself into an internet retailer.

Home Retail Group share price

This is where Argos has some things going for it. It is already the second-largest internet retailer in the UK, with 39% of its total sales made online. It has a growing “click and collect” business where people order goods online and collect from their local store. This is popular with those who want their stuff quickly and is a major competitive advantage over the likes of Amazon. Interestingly, “click & collect” looks set to be a major part of Tesco’s online strategy too. But this raises the question of whether Argos can compete with Tesco and Amazon on price.

What about all those stores? Argos needs to cut costs, and one way to do this is to close stores. In many towns, it has more than one store, so closing some should not harm its ability to serve customers too much.

Getting out of rental agreements with landlords can be expensive. However, 230 (30% of all Argos stores) stores have lease renewals or break clauses during the next five years. This could give Argos a welcome opportunity to cut costs.

Homebase needs to slim down too. It also has the opportunity to get out of some leases. And while the business has suffered from a weak housing market, it has been taking market share from its rivals. It is also part of the Nectar loyalty card scheme. The big question regarding Homebase seems to be: at what level do its profits stabilise?

Watch out for hidden debt pile

In recent weeks we have gone on about the hidden debt of UK retailers such as Tesco. This comes from renting rather than owning stores. The future obligation to pay rents is a debt-like liability that does not sit on company balance sheets.

HRG states that it has £194m of net cash on its balance sheet. But dig a little deeper into its results release and it is quite open about having £2.7bn of off-balance sheet debt. Falling profits means that it is becoming more difficult to pay these debts.

Have a look at the chart below. Five years ago, HRG’s operating profits covered its rental expenses more than twice. Things are looking a lot less comfortable now. A further sharp fall in profits could see HRG being talked about in the same way as Game Group and HMV where the obligation to pay rents threatens the survival of the whole business.

HRG Fixed Charge Cover

Home Retail Group fixed charge cover

So is HRG a stock for value investors?

Obviously, HRG is in trouble - but the share price is telling us that. Can things get much worse? Could HRG be a cheap stock?

Nothing’s certain – particularly not for retail chains in this environment. But HRG is now trading for a lot less than its tangible net asset value (NAV) of 116p, which may attract the interest of distressed asset investors.

Home Retail Group NAV  £m
Goodwill 1,543.9
Other intangible assets 137.1
Property,plant & equipment 516.3
Inventories 933.2
Instalment Receivables 456.7
Other assets 167.4
Total assets 3,754.6
Trade & other payables -1,000.7
Other liabilities -235.3
Pension liability -115.3
Tax assets 24.7
Other 3.1
Net cash 194.3
Net asset value 2,625.4
Less goodwill & intangible assets -1,681
Tangible NAV 944.4
Shares 813.445
Tangible NAV per share(p) 116.1
Current share price (p) 86

However, it’s important to remember that NAVs don’t take into account things like redundancy costs or the costs of getting out of rental agreements. So the amount of money you could get if the business was sold off could be a lot less than the books state.

It’s very difficult to work out what the level of sustainable profits from HRG is, which is why we see no reason to rush out and buy the shares now.

But if you are an adventurous investor who is prepared to take some risks, then this stock might be worth keeping an eye on.

Comments (7)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. fly fly

    (03 May 2012, 11:12AM)  Complain about this comment

    The fundamental problem for Argos is they don't sell anything you can't buy elsewhere. They need a radical change to become, if not online only, then predominantly so, but all that achieves is making them a pure competitor of Amazon - good luck with that!
    Argos stores don't have any stock, just tables with books on, yet they waste a lot of space. They could have installed the counters further up and increased their storage space in many stores. This would help “click and collect” as a unique fulfilment method, a free alternative to delivery. Compare with others where you pay for delivery and then still leave the house to collect it from a Royal Mail centre if you weren't in.
    Argos has too many stores which are too large for their needs going forward. If they can't get out of the lease obligations they will go the way of Woolies etc. The fixed charge cover trend is scary and I imagine their counterparties are already getting nervous, let alone shareholders.

  • 2. Jibhauler

    (03 May 2012, 12:02PM)  Complain about this comment

    How true I remember when Woolies owned most of their store Freeholds, and then the Accountants and speculators got hold of them, sold them or moved the asset into a different bucket for a quick profit and then released the same sites, and if that was not bad enough the same Accountants told the Retailers how to run a retail Business and we know where that ended..........

  • 3. argonaut

    (03 May 2012, 12:03PM)  Complain about this comment

    If you include the lease commitments, doesn't it have a negative NAV?

  • 4. Cidermonkey

    (03 May 2012, 12:50PM)  Complain about this comment

    I always value 25p in pound less when using NAV, it's no more than a hunch, but I find it a pretty good guide. If a business is in the media, with talk of closing outlets, I find sales fall, footfall is down, and customer sentiment darkens, (don't buy there you wont be able to get your money back, it's closing etc) I wonder if other readers feel the same

  • 5. C H Ingoldby

    (06 May 2012, 06:33PM)  Complain about this comment

    No assets, big liabilities and an outdated business model.

    That is too scary for me.

  • 6. Andrew

    (08 August 2012, 01:34PM)  Complain about this comment

    Beyond the quantitative factors of the balance sheet all pointing in one direction there are further fundemental issues with the company (especially wrt their delivery services), as a quick trip to any customer review forum will tell you. There is money to be made from HRG shares and its by shorting them; I give the Homebase brand 3 years max.

  • 7. The Designer

    (28 March 2013, 04:15PM)  Complain about this comment

    I am not an investor but I do have an interest as I work for Hrg. And what many of you say about rents and too larger premises is true. In Norwich we have four Argos stores 1 oversized superstore and a smaller store. Argos will in my opinion dissappear from the high street because everything they sell can be found on the Internet and at a lesser price.Homebase on the other hand if it
    continues will be a major player in the kitchen and
    bedroom and if their lucky bathrooms. They appear to be trying to be competitive but many companys are willing to take a hit.Homebase will with careful investment and management still be around when similar companys are gone

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>