How to profit from the football feeding frenzy - buy BT

By Phil Oakley Jun 14, 2012

Phil Oakley

Share with
friends:

Comments (5) Print this article

Most people think that we are living in an age of austerity. Try telling that to the managements at BSkyB and BT.

Between them, they have agreed to shell out a staggering £3bn to screen live Premier League football matches for three seasons from August 2013.

That’s 70% more than the £1.75bn being paid for the current rights.

It’s certainly good news for top football players – but they’re not the only ones who could profit. Here’s why.

How will this affect the finances of football clubs?
Premier League clubs will get a welcome income boost. But while this may be good news for their fortunes on the pitch, if history is anything to go by, most of the extra cash could end up in players’ wallets. So it’s unlikely that it will lead to Premier League clubs turning their current losses into big profits.

More income, however, should make it easier for clubs to meet UEFA’s financial fair play rules, whereby they will have to balance their books (for more on this, read my recent piece on football finances).

Footie fans will have to shell out even more for their fix

But where will the money come from? Sky and BT both need to get a return on their investments. With the live rights costing 70% more than the existing deal, the chances are that viewers are going to have to pay more to watch football.

But how much more? Sky has been quite coy on this issue so far. It talks about offsetting the cost of football rights with cost efficiencies and discretionary spending elsewhere. BT meanwhile, has yet to develop a pricing plan.

However, there’s an argument to say that football on TV is currently quite reasonably priced, and there’s room for increases.

Before you throw something at your screen, of course I realise that most of us would rather not pay to watch football, and many people either can’t afford to, or simply don’t want to.

However, let’s look at the costs for those who do. A ruling by broadcast regulator OFCOM means that Sky currently has to wholesale its Sky Sports 1 and 2 channels at a fixed price to the likes of BT and Virgin Media. These companies usually re-sell these channels to their customers at cost or a slight loss.

At the moment, a subscriber to BT Vision could have both channels for £18.20 per month. This allows them to watch 115 live matches plus cricket and lots of other sports. Over nine months of the football season that works out at £1.42 per match. A season ticket at Arsenal next season for 19 league and 7 cup matches works out at £37.88 per match. At Wigan it is £15.78 per match.

So if you like your football, then watching on TV looks quite good value – it might not be as enjoyable as a live match, but it’s an awful lot cheaper. And that suggests that Sky and BT could raise prices a fair bit before people would stop buying.


Sign up for a 3-week FREE trial of MoneyWeek
and get the following free as well

"The only financial publication I could not be without."
John Lang, Director, Tower Hill Associates Ltd


Is this a bad deal for Sky and BT investors?

The stockmarket this morning seemed unimpressed. Sky shares were marked down 6.7%, with BT’s down 2.8%.

Sky’s share price slid because it paid a lot more than analysts had hoped. According to the Financial Times, the City was expecting Sky to pay £620m per season rather than the £760m they have agreed to pay, so promptly lowered their profit forecasts.

That said, Sky has still retained 116 matches, which allows it to keep its flagship Sunday and Monday night football programmes. It will also still wholesale these matches to other broadcasters. The key issue could be the price differential between Sky and BT – will Sky customers jump ship?

Writing off Sky has been a losing bet and it’s not one we’re prepared to make now. Its ten million customers indicate that it remains a good business. But if you didn’t already realise it, you now know just how critical footballing rights are to Sky’s business model. Given these factors, at these levels, we are neither buyers nor sellers of the company.

BT share price

BT on the other hand, is altogether more interesting. It is now venturing into areas where Setanta and ESPN failed to make hay before them. Can BT succeed?

While the company has been winning lots of new broadband customers, it has realised that it needs a credible TV offer to keep customers happy. Increasingly, customers are looking to buy their phone, broadband and pay-TV packages from the same provider. So far, BT Vision has failed to make a big impact with only 700,000 subscribers.

But BT may do better than people think. Unlike Setanta and ESPN, it has bought some better quality matches than they did. It has agreed to pay £246m per season for 38 matches, 18 of which are so called ‘first-choice matches’ involving the top clubs. This means it stands a better chance of attracting viewers. It will set up a dedicated interactive football channel to screen matches over its fibre-optic network, and look to sell its content to others such as Sky.

Also, it’s not been reported much in the press, but BT is quietly building a pay–TV business that will exploit the high bandwidths of its fibre-optic network. This network allows BT to broadcast live channels (known as linear TV) over the internet.

This means that BT will save money as it will no longer have to rent space from Freeview as it does now. It has already signed deals with FX, UKTV and National Geographic to have their live channels. The addition of football and other channels could eventually create a powerful third player in the pay-TV market.

More importantly, with fibre-optic broadband being rolled out to around two-thirds of the country, BT is effectively taking on Virgin Media’s cable TV business. Perhaps it is Virgin rather than Sky that has most to fear?

So do the numbers stack up for BT? Time will tell. Profits and cash flow are expected to decline by £100m and £200m respectively in 2013/14 due to football costs.

But by 2014/15, BT is predicting underlying free cash flow of £2.5bn or 32p per share. This gives it an underlying free cash flow yield of 15.8% at the current share price of 203p.

Given a yield of just over 4%, BT’s dividend looks safe and it has the potential for strong growth. With the state of its pension fund looking a lot more healthy and its competitive position getting stronger, we think BT shares are a buy.

Comments (5)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. JW

    (17 June 2012, 08:33AM)  Complain about this comment

    I'm not sure about the "£1.42 per match v £15.78 per (Wigan) match" analogy. It's not comparing apples with apples.

    For £15.78 per match, a Wigan fan gets to see ALL of their home matches at the stadium, complete with atmosphere (hopefully) and camaraderie. For £1.42, you don't get a choice of what match to watch, and have to put up with adverts and only get to see what the director decides to show you.

    I can't see many TV viewers stumping up anything like £15 to watch one random match! Like you say in your article, time will tell on this one.

  • 2. Barry O'bivion

    (18 June 2012, 01:54PM)  Complain about this comment

    I can see BT's thinking, no need for a dish. but BT needs to get its skates on and speed up its fibre-optic rollout then!

    There is a big future for Internet TV; although i reckon before BT makes any real money out of it, that either YouTube or AppleTV will eventually buy prem league rights.

  • 3. CKP

    (18 June 2012, 02:47PM)  Complain about this comment

    Anyone who has experienced BT's customer service will not be holding their breath on them grabbing lots of pay-TV market share. Also their pension deficit may be marginally smaller but a black hole is still a black hole. Their reckless overbidding for football rights is evidence of poor management. BT is one of those companies that has not managed to shake off it's legacy state-ownership skeletons. Avoid.

  • 4. Boris MacDonut

    (18 June 2012, 06:24PM)  Complain about this comment

    The snout/trough interface just widened. The posh blokes must be squirming. Only one public schoolboy in the Prmeier League and only one ever playing for Arsenal in 60 years. They are all missing a great chance to make a few quid through blind pompous snobbery.

  • 5. Al

    (25 April 2013, 10:35AM)  Complain about this comment

    With all due respect CKP, you don't know what you're talking about.

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>