Patience rewarded: three shares to buy now

By Simon Marsh Jul 06, 2012

Simon Marsh

Share with
friends:

Comments (1) Print this article

Each week, a professional investor tells MoneyWeek where he'd put his money now. This week: Simon Marsh, parner with Killick & Co.

European politics continue to take centre stage with Greece and Spain dominating the headlines. Aside from the impact this crisis is having on markets there is also the enormous social cost. Youth unemployment has passed 50% in Greece and Spain, which is stoking a rise in political extremism across the continent, as disenchantment with mainstream politics grows. This, of course, is all the more ironic when you consider that the euro project was designed to foster harmony.

Whatever direction the crisis takes now, the costs for Germany will be high, and the free ride it has enjoyed over the last decade by attaching its export machine to an artificially competitive exchange rate is over. Germany must now settle the bill for the advantage it has enjoyed. For the project to continue, it will have no option but to support the direct re-capitalisation of much of Europe’s banking system and commit to some form of debt mutualisation. Without this, it is difficult to see how the euro in its current form can survive.

The problem for the market is that the German public does not support such largesse. Angela Merkel will therefore do everything to avoid ‘settling the bill’ for the rest of Europe until after the next federal election, which under German constitutional law can only be held between 27 August and 27 October 2013.

In the US and UK, the longer-term objective (and only viable policy option) will be to keep interest rates artificially low in order to reduce the real debt burden through inflation. Holders of government bonds stand to take much of the pain and the adjustments required to bring debt-to-GDP ratios back to manageable levels will take decades.

However, it is worth remembering that we have been here before. In 1946, Treasury yields stood at 1.5% and remained low until the early 1950s to enable the government to finance the debts accumulated as a consequence of the Second World War. Inflation was then allowed to do the heavy lifting and, by the early 1980s, the US government had managed to reduce the debt-to-GDP ratio from 120% immediately after the war to below 40%.

For equity investors, the coming months are likely to remain volatile and unpredictable, but we sense we are edging closer to an inflection point, and if history does indeed repeat itself, patience is likely to be rewarded. Here are three shares I expect to outperform in the current environment.

Amlin

Amlin (LSE: AML), on a prospective yield of 6.5%, is a non-life and reinsurance underwriter on the Lloyd’s market. The shares offer a straight play on hardening insurance rates and shouldn’t be too impacted by a deterioration in the macro environment.

Rolls-Royce (LSE: RR), on a prospective yield of 2.2%, is the pre-eminent manufacturer of aero engines. It will continue to benefit from one of the world’s most enduring growth stories – air travel. The company’s long-term maintenance contracts also provide the group with an unusually high level of earnings visibility.

BAT (LSE: BATS), on a prospective yield of 4.2%, is a cigarette manufacturer with a truly global franchise, offering high barriers to entry (advertising is banned) and a defensive earnings stream.

Comments (1)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Austriauk

    (09 July 2012, 10:44PM)  Complain about this comment

    I throughly disagree with Germany having had a free ride. No one stopped the other EU nations from enhancing their competitiveness. They chose to go on a spending spree, 'investment' in public services and wage inflation instead. Having worked in a number of different European countries it is obvious that there are big differences in mentality, work ethic and ingenuity. It does not mean that one nation was better than the other but the differences won't go away. Way Germany should pay again and again having financed the EU largely for the last 50 years, plus rebuild Eastern Germany etc is not entirely clear to me. They did not want t give up their D-Mark but when encouraged to do so in the interest of European integration wanted to so on fiscally sound terms.

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>