The strangest penny share story you'll hear all year

By Tom Bulford Jan 05, 2012

Tom Bulford

Share with
friends:

Comments (9) Print this article

It may only be 5 January, but I doubt you'll hear a stranger story than this all year…

To get to the start, we need to pop back to the tail end of last year, to 24 November. That was the day a new company called Worldlink Group (WGP) was admitted to the main list of the London Stock Exchange.

Now as you probably know, not just any old business can be accepted onto the main list. You've got to meet the entry requirements.

While it's pretty straightforward for the racier outfits to get a listing on Aim or Plus Markets, companies on the main list are (rightly or wrongly) perceived as being safer. The London Stock Exchange insists that these companies are thoroughly vetted before being allowed in.

Now, on 24 November in a statement that was no doubt scrutinised, checked, debated and finally agreed by bankers, lawyers, PR advisers and the great London Stock Exchange itself, this statement was made about Worldlink:

"The market capitalisation at listing is anticipated to be circa £55m and the opening share price approximately £2.50."

To Worldlink's advisers, £2.50 must have seemed like a nice beefy share price, the sort to convince investors that this is a business with substance. And what about the £55m stock market value? It's not huge by any means – but surely not a business that is going to disappear in a puff of dust.

How a shock slump knocked this share down 77%

But that was six weeks ago; it's a different picture now. Things have got better for Worldlink in terms of business: it's won some €15m of financial backing and launched two new promising initiatives, of which more in a moment.

So where is the share price now? It's at 15 pence! Worldlink is no longer valued at the £55m its bankers anticipated. Now, it's just £3.51m – well below even the €15m value of the promised financing!

What on earth is going on?

In fact, Worldlink never achieved the £2.50 share price the admission announcement mentioned. The shares did open at 112.5p on the first day of trading, but by the end of the second day, and after the rather puny amount of 115,000 shares had been traded, the price had sunk to 25p. That's a staggering 77% slump from the opening price!

I have never seen anything like this in my life. And, to be honest, the silence from the London Stock Exchange, which you would think would want to explain this strange affair, is deafening.

To make the story even stranger, chief executive and major shareholder Neil Riches, whom I met just before Christmas, thinks that Worldlink is going to make serious money this year. And a report by Marble Arch Research calculates that Worldlink has a hidden value of £180m – worth about £8 per share.

But here we are today, with Worldlink shares trading at 15p and right down in penny share territory. Intrigued? I certainly was! This is exactly the sort of anomaly I like to check out.


Penny shares to watch 2013
RHPs issues

  • Red Hot Penny Shares. The definitive guide to what Tom Bulford believes are the best penny shares to buy.

  • Tom Bulford's weekly penny share tipping service.

Red Hot Penny Shares is a regulated product issued by Fleet Street Publications Ltd. Your capital is at risk when you invest in shares never risk more than you can afford to lose. Penny shares can be riskier than other investments – they can be relatively hard to trade and if you need to sell soon after you've bought you might get less back than you paid. Please seek independent financial advice if necessary. 0207 633 3601.


Let me deal first with how Worldlink might make money this year. We find a clue in a deal that it has struck with the mighty Ramsgate Football Club (of Ryman League Division 1). In a deal similar to those done by football clubs with credit card providers, Ramsgate will pocket 20% of any betting profits sourced from those who sign up to use a betting service – Ramsgate football supporters presumably.

Where does Worldlink come into this? Well, it provides the online platform that makes this betting possible. And Riches sees the chance to roll the service out to other clubs. That makes sense –  why wouldn't these clubs go for it, given that it costs nothing and provides some much needed extra revenue? That means that this could soon be making money for Worldlink.

Why this battered stock could have huge hidden value

But that's not the end of the story. While providing the software platform for sports betting could be lucrative, it is not the reason for that £180m of hidden value Marble Arch Research talks about. This is where it really gets interesting!

In the 1990s Worldlink developed software that allowed for the dissemination of real-time data to mobile telephones. What made this special was that, rather than refreshing whole pages, Worldlink made it possible to transmit only the particular data item – a rising share price, for example – that had changed. Nothing very special about that any more, you may say. Active traders receive this sort of data feed all the time.

And that is exactly the point. Because Worldlink thinks that many of these service providers are infringing its software patents. For years it has been unable to pursue the transgressors. Now, though, it is ready to do so.

Years ago, both Reuters and WeComm bought licences from Worldlink, establishing the principle that it owns the rights. And lawyers on both sides of the Atlantic, who might be prepared to pursue the case in exchange for a share of the proceeds of success, have given Worldlink hope that its legal action can succeed.

A key test will be a 'Markman hearing' expected in late 2012 or early 2013. In this pre-trial procedure a US judge will express a view about Worldlink's patent infringement case. Encouragement from this quarter could lead to out of court settlements.

It is the view of Marble Arch Research that such settlements could be worth a lot of money. On the basis that Worldlink will be able to charge royalties, and discounting these at a rate of 40% per annum, Marble Arch comes up with its £180m figure.

This is a very strange story. With all that apparent potential value, I'll keep it on my radar, that's for sure!

Why you need to look carefully before you invest

But one thing this story does show is that you can't just assume that everything's OK, just because a stock is listed on the Main List of the stock exchange.

I spend my life defending my rationale for investing in interesting, innovative, exciting and potentially rewarding small companies that trade on the junior Aim market. Yes I know these small stocks by their nature can be risky – but for me the upside potential can make those risks worthwhile.

• This article is taken from Tom Bulford's free twice-weekly small-cap investment email The Penny Sleuth. Sign up to The Penny Sleuth here.

Information in Penny Sleuth is for general information only and is not intended to be relied upon by individual readers in making (or not making) specific investment decisions. Penny Sleuth is an unregulated product published by MoneyWeek Ltd.

Comments (9)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. gary carp

    (05 January 2012, 06:20PM)  Complain about this comment

    i am increasingly concerned about a number of small cap Aim miners with low to minimal revenues,lots of "potential" who appear to be rewarding directors with aburdly high packages...do you have view?w

  • 2. Emma Nice

    (05 January 2012, 11:54PM)  Complain about this comment

    Interesting that a main partner, Interactive Data, has not licensed the patent at all or noted it as consideration despite owning ESignal/Quotrek, arguable a key candidate for infringing in theory. Why have no licenses been granted in the last 7-8 yrs despite funds being raised several times? Why is European Patent still pending despite being applied for years ago? £3K revenue and no licence grants last year despite the previous money raised mentioned in their Prospectus? If they can address these issues, potentially very promising.

  • 3. US Patent Boy

    (06 January 2012, 01:20PM)  Complain about this comment

    I think this article and investors may have missed the point. The granted patent family probably only really has commercial validity in a bandwidth restricted world (think pre Super 3G etc).... As 4G, Fibre Optic Networks, LTE and WiMAx gets rolled out, fixed and mobile internet users in particular will not care about only uploading sections of the website that have changed in the last time period... they will simply download the whole page lock stock and barrel.

    As for securing licensing agreements themselves, the experience from here in the USA suggests a long drawn out battle or more likely. Think NTP / Blackberry and I4I / Microsoft before any payment (post contingent lawyer fees) are possible....

    Hard to see why investors should get excited at this stage of the AIM company's development...

  • 4. Michael Silver

    (06 January 2012, 02:05PM)  Complain about this comment

    I do enjoy finding penny stocks like this that are below book value. It is strange that the market can overlook companies trading at a significant discount to asset backing. I used to only have a full service broker but now have moved to a discount broker called Zecco that was recommended on a review site at http://www.learntotradestocks.org/penny-stock-brokers/
    I will add Worldlink group into the mix.

  • 5. John Wayne

    (15 January 2012, 03:21PM)  Complain about this comment

    Do you see this as going down? Last week it got all the attention of the world because of your article and the company announcement.

    But it seems like it is now starting to drop as its 15min fame passed. Should we wait for an anetry on this penny share or do you think price will go up so we should buy the soonest possible?

  • 6. James

    (10 February 2012, 04:07PM)  Complain about this comment

    Well, well!!

    The company has been approached by the US group One Media Technology.

    So apparently there is substance behind their products and innovation.

    If the bankers believe the company is worth c. £55m then the offer needs to be a lot higher than current share price in order to be accepted.

    The article above does not state clearly the reasons for the drop of the price! Malfunction maybe! and last week's news for possible buy-out of the company by One Media Technology makes it a fantastic opportunity for traders to profit since share price still is at very low levels!

    Comments from author or anyone who can shed some light are appreciated.

  • 7. Mickey D

    (04 May 2012, 02:36PM)  Complain about this comment

    I would love to know what Tom Bulford thinks of this little beauty now that it has sunk to 8p per share...

  • 8. Frank

    (04 May 2012, 11:32PM)  Complain about this comment

    James is definitely right.. "What on earth is going on?" Yeah.. it seemed as if the author was genuinely was asking that
    question.

    A report by Marble Arch Research calculates that "Worldlink has a hidden value of £180m – worth about £8 per share."
    How do we know that this marble arch research group aren't being biast with thier "calculation".. besides, its not
    something you can calculate.. its a guess, you can only guess the outcome of the justice system. And if its settled out
    of court you can also only guess what they will consider to be fair. Its a pity he didn't have more to say about this issue.

    And when Worldlink grp sank from €55m, Tom Bulford said that it plummeted "well below even the €15m value of the promised
    financing", what did he mean by promised financing??

    It's won some €15m of financial backing - He also failed to mention anything about this.

    If only I knew more about Fibre Optic Networks, LTE and WiMAx ect.

  • 9. Frank

    (04 May 2012, 11:34PM)  Complain about this comment

    James is definitely right.. "What on earth is going on?" Yeah.. it seemed as if the author was genuinely was asking that
    question.

    A report by Marble Arch Research calculates that "Worldlink has a hidden value of £180m – worth about £8 per share."
    How do we know that this marble arch research group aren't being biast with thier "calculation".. besides, its not
    something you can calculate.. its a guess, you can only guess the outcome of the justice system. And if its settled out
    of court you can also only guess what they will consider to be fair. Its a pity he didn't have more to say about this issue.

    And when Worldlink grp sank from €55m, Tom Bulford said that it plummeted "well below even the €15m value of the promised
    financing", what did he mean by promised financing??

    It's won some €15m of financial backing - He also failed to mention anything about this.

    If only I knew more about Fibre Optic Networks, LTE and WiMAx ect.

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>