Falklands oil players on the cusp of something huge

By Tom Bulford Jul 03, 2012

Tom Bulford

Share with
friends:

Comments (13) Print this article

Stand by for action! The Falklands Islands could be making headlines again very shortly. And this time, it won’t be Cameron and Kirchner who are dominating the headlines.

On 11 May, Borders & Southern (BOR), one of the intrepid band of Falklands oil explorers, announced that it had spudded its Stebbing well. "The well duration", said Borders, "is estimated to be 49 days". 49 days from 11 May takes us to 29 June – so any day now we should be getting the result of this well. And the whole Falklands oil story should take another step forward.

If you have been a Penny Sleuth subscriber for a while, you will know that I keep a watchful eye over the Falklands, and take note of every rumble and roar. Just this year some of the Falklands' oil explorers have seen share prices take a significant jump.

The most notable success so far has been Rockhopper’s Sea Lion discovery of 1.3 billion barrels – however, later on I shall tell you about a discovery which could prove to be up to three times this find!

While Cristina Kirchner and David Cameron were squaring up at the recent G20 meeting, and Argentinian officials were brandishing our prime minister a ‘colonialist’ for dismissing Kirchner's call for talks on the sovereignty of the islands, the oil industry is carrying on pretty much regardless.

Tensions fraught between Cameron and Kirchner

Let me deal with the political situation first. In respect of her demands over the Falklands, Kirchner has shot herself squarely in the foot by the sudden decision to nationalise the Argentinian interests of the Spanish oil company Repsol.

Kirchner accused Repsol of a failure to invest in the country’s oil industry, but this seemed little more than a trumped up excuse for an act of piracy that made Kirchner no friends outside of her own country and her limited cabal of South American sympathisers. In her attempts to enlist international support for her claims to the Falklands, this act of high handedness can only backfire.

Cameron, meanwhile, is sticking to his line that the Falkland Islanders should be allowed to make up their own mind about their political future. There will be a referendum next year on the issue and the chances of the islanders committing their future to the Argentinian flag are very remote indeed.


Penny shares to watch 2013
RHPs issues

  • Red Hot Penny Shares. The definitive guide to what Tom Bulford believes are the best penny shares to buy.

  • Tom Bulford's weekly penny share tipping service.

Red Hot Penny Shares is a regulated product issued by Fleet Street Publications Ltd. Your capital is at risk when you invest in shares never risk more than you can afford to lose. Penny shares can be riskier than other investments – they can be relatively hard to trade and if you need to sell soon after you've bought you might get less back than you paid. Please seek independent financial advice if necessary. 0207 633 3601.


Rich opportunity for the leading Falklands oil players

The Repsol affair has upset Spain, and now Argentina has French and Italian interests to contend with. This follows last week’s news that Edison Spa, an Italian utility owned by France’s EDF has farmed into the licences of Falkland Oil & Gas (FOGL). Edison will receive a 25% interest in Falkland Oil’s northern licences and a 12.5% interest in the southern licences off the archipelago in return for paying drilling costs of $50m and a separate cash payment of $40m.

This gives FOGL some useful financial ammunition to further its exploration programme and it expects to spud its first well on the giant Loligo prospect in July. With estimated potential recoverable resources of 4.7 billion barrels of oil, this is one of the biggest prospects drilled anywhere in recent years, and a successful find would turn the Falklands into a major oil province overnight. To put it in context, this is more than ten times the size of Rockhopper’s (RKH) Sea Lion find in the north Falklands Basin, which has estimated recoverable resources of 350 million barrels.

Rockhopper, though, does have the advantage of a confirmed find, the only one to date in the region. According to an independent assessment by Gaffney Cline & Associates, development of the Sea Lion field has a 90% chance of going ahead. On this basis, and after applying a 10% discount rate, it has been valued at £2.2bn, which is a long way over Rockhopper’s current £733m stock market valuation.

This gap reflects lingering doubts that the oil will ever be lifted, and what Rockhopper needs is a partner to put up much of the considerable amount of money needed to develop the field. Rockhopper has opened a data room to prospective partners, and chairman Dr Pierre Jungels comments that "whilst the location of our acreage has prevented some companies from being able to participate, I have been very pleased by the quality of those that are doing so".  Participation in the Rockhopper venture by a reputable oil partner would endorse the region.

The Falkland Islands oil business could dominate the news

Another business that is clearly betting on a favourable outcome is Falkland Island Holdings (FKL). It has raised £8m, most of which will be spent on the Falklands where the company owns a number of sites on the outskirts of Stanley which are suitable for the development of a warehouse park for rental to oilfield services companies.

Anticipating an influx of oil men, it is also planning to invest in housing, offices, retail operations and its Land Rover dealership, and it has signed a joint venture with Southampton-based Trant Construction Limited.

So despite the sound and fury of the political debate, the oil business of the Falkland Islands is proceeding apace. In the next few weeks it could take a major leap forward. Results from Border & Southern’s Stebbing well and FOGL’s Loligo, along with news of a partner for Rockhopper, and the Falklands will be in the news for reasons that have nothing to do with the anniversary of the war.

• This article is taken from Tom Bulford's free twice-weekly small-cap investment email The Penny Sleuth. Sign up to The Penny Sleuth here.

Information in Penny Sleuth is for general information only and is not intended to be relied upon by individual readers in making (or not making) specific investment decisions. Penny Sleuth is an unregulated product published by Fleet Street Publications Ltd.

Comments (13)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Pro.

    (04 July 2012, 01:40AM)  Complain about this comment

    Tom,

    Oil In Place (OIP) is the amount of oil in a reservoir before recovery.

    Prospective Resources, is potentially the amount of "recoverable" oil in a reservoir.

    Your article is wrong.

    Loligo potential OIP is circa 15 billion barrels and Prospective Resources (potential RECOVERABLE) is 4.7 billion barrels.

    Sea Lion of Rockhopper is 1.2 billion OIP but Prospective Resources (potential RECOVERABLE) is circa 350 million.

    Loligo is around 13.5 times bigger than Sea Lion - not 3 times.

    Remember, Prospective Resources = Recoverable Barrels Potential and its not OIP.

  • 2. Pro.

    (04 July 2012, 05:18AM)  Complain about this comment

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_reserves

    1. Prospective resources are those quantities of petroleum estimated, as of a given date, to be potentially recoverable from undiscovered accumulations............

    2. The amount of oil in a subsurface reservoir is called oil in place (OIP).[10] Only a fraction of this oil can be recovered from a reservoir. This fraction is called the recovery factor.[10]........

    --------------

    FOGL has historically always quoted "prospective resources" which is the potential recoverable barrels - if you want to convert prospective resources to OIP then for FOGL they use 30% recovery factor, so 4.7 billion prospective resources = 15.6 billion OIP

    (4.7b divide by 30 and times 100 = 15.6 billion OIP)

  • 3. Robert

    (04 July 2012, 07:58AM)  Complain about this comment

    Thanks for the explanation Pro

  • 4. stepheng

    (04 July 2012, 08:48AM)  Complain about this comment

    if a tipster cant get the facts right then it dont say much for the tip does it

  • 5. martin edwards

    (04 July 2012, 12:49PM)  Complain about this comment

    Just wondered if 'fracking' technology improves the recovery factor?

  • 6. simone

    (04 July 2012, 01:45PM)  Complain about this comment

    You haven't mentioned desire petroleum . Any reason for this?

  • 7. insider

    (04 July 2012, 06:21PM)  Complain about this comment

    And the empire has still its hands on other nations resources. It is stacking up problems and more problems. Don't complain when other nations react to the usurpation.

  • 8. scott

    (04 July 2012, 07:40PM)  Complain about this comment

    @insider
    What are you talking about? Argentina never owed the islands, they are trying it on as they always have done!

  • 9. BritBob

    (04 July 2012, 07:49PM)  Complain about this comment

    Argentina has absolutely no claim on the Falkland Islands.
    In 1850 they signed a treaty with Great Britain called the 'Conventiuon of Settlement' whereby both nations acknowledged that they no longer had any outstanding differences. In the 1870s and 1880s the Argentine Government produced maps that either excluded the Falkland Islands from their territory or showed the Falklands in a different colour like the '1882 Latzina Map'. They have no case. There claims are based on proximity only and they refuse to to take their case to the international court.

  • 10. Tom Bulford

    (05 July 2012, 08:26AM)  Complain about this comment

    ‘Pro’ is absolutely correct! I do understand the difference between ‘Oil in Place’ and ‘Prospective Resources’ (‘Potentially Recoverable’) but got my numbers in a twist on this occasion.

    Thanks, Pro, for setting this straight! I'll have this corrected in the article.

    Tom

  • 11. Richie

    (05 July 2012, 11:19PM)  Complain about this comment

    Can anyone please explain how you get from 350 million barrels of oil, to a valuation of £2.2 billion for Rockhopper's Sea Lion?

    Many thanks

    Richie

  • 12. sags12

    (09 July 2012, 12:12AM)  Complain about this comment

    Ah good ol miner and oil! Used to trade these at college, made over 400% during 2010-2011! Anyone remember HER, SOU, RRL to name a few? Remember SAR going through the roof? Did anyone get boned on NTOG and SOLO? I did! These stocks are nothing but punts, if you want some idea of getting an edge on institutional and insider money, then study their behaviour by studying price and volume action. I recommend recommend trading an index ETF and using technical analysis, TA is the only edge outsiders have, unless you know something the rest of the competition doesn't.

  • 13. FRANK NYHAN

    (12 August 2012, 06:29PM)  Complain about this comment

    Lol.. "at the cusp of something huge", apparently not!!!!!!!!!!! Stebbing was a blunder

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>