Is it time to buy BP?

By MoneyWeek Editor John Stepek Jun 17, 2010

John Stepek

Share with
friends:

Comments (29) Print this article

We knew it was coming. And now the news is out there. BP won't be paying a dividend this year.

And it's putting $20bn over four years into a fund to meet compensation claims and clean-up costs for the Deepwater Horizon disaster.

It's now been almost two months since the rig blew up. During that time, the estimates of the amount of oil spilling into the Gulf have soared. And BP's share price has near-enough halved.

For investors – or potential investors – the big question now is: does this mark the beginning of the end? Or is there worse to come?

BP can afford this $20bn compensation fund

Let's make one thing clear right away. The $20bn that BP is putting into a compensation fund is just a down-payment as far as the White House is concerned. Barack Obama has been at pains to emphasise that this does not mark any sort of cap on BP's liability.

Recommended reading

Now, it might be enough to cover all the costs. Jason Kenney at ING Wholesale Banking tells Bloomberg: "The hope is that it's far too much for what is actually going to be required. This doesn't mean the downfall of BP; it can get through this."

But a cynic might argue that when you stick $20bn in a compensation fund, the lawyers and claimants then see it as a target to aim for, rather than any sort of limit. And analysts elsewhere are less confident – Credit Suisse has suggested the final bill could be $49bn.

However, the good news is that BP can afford this $20bn. It's putting $5bn in this year, then the rest over four years. As well as stopping the dividend, BP is going to reduce investments in drilling and will sell some of its oil and gas fields.

And at least it has now made some sort of deal with Obama. The company is not on the verge of going bankrupt. And it would certainly be stupid for the US government to kill off the cash cow that will be paying for this mess by confiscating its assets or kicking it out of the US.

BP is not the same stock as it was before the spill

So what's our take on the stock? Well, let me digress for a moment – bear with me, this is relevant. If you're anything like me as an investor, then you've probably got your 'sensible' money. That's the money you put into your long-term investments, your pension money, the 'boring' investments, for want of a better word.

And then there's your not-so-sensible fund. This is the money you use to chase the ten-baggers, the speculative little biotechs (those happen to be my weakness) or junior miners or oil explorers. All or nothing stocks that might come good or might just lose you all your money.


Special FREE report from MoneyWeek magazine: When will house prices bottom out - and how will you know?

  • Why UK property prices are going to fall 50%
  • When it will be time to get back in and buy up half price property

I'm sure you all recognise this – you've got your retirement fund and then you've got your gambling money. Why am I telling you this? Because it's very relevant to how you treat an investment in BP right now. I made this point in the weekend MoneyWeek round-up and it still stands. Whether or not BP is now a buy, it's not the same stock it was before the spill.

Before the spill, our main worry about BP was whether or not the global economy would support a high enough oil price for the company to maintain its dividend. Based on that concern, my colleague David Stevenson suggested that investors not already in BP should be wary about picking it up, although if you already held it, it wasn't a big enough threat to sell.

Now of course, the nature of the story is entirely different. We know that BP's not going to pay any dividend this year. The question now is, is it low enough to have a punt on? The price has bounced nearly 7% this morning to about £3.60. But my gut instinct is that, yes, down here, BP is cheap enough to risk some money on.

But the point is, if you are going to risk it, you should be betting on BP with your punting money, not with your long-term investment cash. BP is no longer up there with the GlaxoSmithKlines and the Johnson & Johnsons of this world. It's now much closer to those binary-bet stocks, where one wrong move can send the whole thing spiralling into disaster.

Until the leak is plugged, there's an awful lot that could go wrong

Sure, this $20bn sacrifice should at least enable BP to start putting an end to the political nightmare and start fighting its corner a bit. And certainly, many analysts see it as drawing a line in the sand.

But don't imagine it's all going to be sweetness and light from here. Chief executive Tony Hayward still has to stand in front of Congress today and take a theatrical kicking from politicians trying to show how tough they are. And BP chairman Carl-Henric Svanberg is already getting it in the neck in various media reports because he said, after the $20bn fund was announced, that BP cares about "the small people." Sure, it's patronising, but bear in mind that the man's first language is Swedish.

(It does make you wonder if BP actually employs any communications management or PR people at all, and if it does, what on earth they've been doing for the past two months. I'd suggest that any cost-cutting starts off somewhere in that department).

But none of this helps BP to plug the dirty great hole in the ocean floor that's chucking all this oil out. And until the leak is dealt with, we can't really talk about drawing lines under anything. There's still an awful lot that can go wrong for the company here. And that's before the lawyers really get their mandibles stuck into the story.

Our recommended article for today

Four experimental biotech stocks

The field of 'regenerative medicine' has seen some incredible advances, and the market is set to take off, says Marc Lichtenfeld. Here, he explains how to play the sector and tips four potential winners.

Comments (29)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. IJ

    (17 June 2010, 11:19AM)  Complain about this comment

    I agree that BP is a "buy". Not because I have a clue about what awaits BP, or the final cost of the liabilities. I just think the odds seem to favour buying. The thing about investing is we know far less than we think we do and our perception of reality is always flawed. Often, the stocks we think are "boring" in fact conceal an enormous amount of risk (wasn't BP a "boring" stock before?), have a lot more downside potential and are therefore in fact riskier than ones we view as "risky". When risk has come out of its hiding place with a vengeance and is out there for all to see on the front cover of all the newspapers, you should buy. Sell when the news is good. Sure - you won't always get it right, and some companies may go bankrupt. Indeed, BP might. But on aggregate you're less likely to go bust following that strategy than chasing hot stocks.

  • 2. Jane Osborne

    (17 June 2010, 11:22AM)  Complain about this comment

    I think this is disgraceful bullying by the US President. Where were the US administration when Union Carbide were killing people or when the Exxon Valdez went down. I am very pro green but I take great exception to governments telling British companies how to run their businesses. Lehmann Bros. Am I having a blonde moment? I don't remember the US President berating his own bankers for their behaviour. This is the first catastrophic environmental disaster on US shores. Oh apart from New Orleans flooding. And didn't they take a long time to get their act together on that one. We live in one world. Obama is an international player who should be able to see further than his own rhetoric and his own borders.

  • 3. Stephen B

    (17 June 2010, 11:41AM)  Complain about this comment

    Another neg for the stock is the affect on the brand, with consumer movements in the US boycotting their petrol, and presumably their minimarts.
    I however have been impressed with Hayward, the damage to safety was done under Browne, and I think he has been unfairly treated by the media - the pressure he is under is huge.
    But inevitably he will get ousted and then the share will rise, in the meantime I think it will bounce along at its current price for a while.
    In punting terms, it is speculative and I would consider a spreadbet rather than buying it outright.

  • 4. w2w

    (17 June 2010, 11:44AM)  Complain about this comment

    On the face of it I would have thought $20bn would cover the clean up and probably all of the compensation claims too. However, I was concerned to hear a US lawyer being intervied on Radio 4 recently. He was one of the lead lawyers involved in extarcting $300bn+ in compensation from the tobaco companies. He stated that he was expecting to sue BP for compensation for shareholders lossess. BP was valued at around $120bn before this incident and has currently lost $50bn+ in share value. If indeed US law allows for such compensation payments, then BP may well be bankrupted. Unless they have insurance to cover said claims.

  • 5. Mike

    (17 June 2010, 12:13PM)  Complain about this comment

    Stunningly uninformative article.

    In summary
    $20bn may or may not be enough.
    BP is not on the verge of going bust - I take it this reserves the option that they will go bust in a longer time frame than a 'verge'
    The oil spil has made BP a bigger risk - which is not strictly true, it has made patent the risks the investors didn'previously factor in
    Cost cutting should start in PR - maybe cost cutting was the problem not the solution, maybe they should continue to concentrate on sorting the problem and leave jouno's to rprovide their own spouting

  • 6. Peter Connelly

    (17 June 2010, 12:18PM)  Complain about this comment

    The GOM blowout and oil leak is a massive catastrophe and i'm absolutely sure BP is devasted by this, is doing everything in its power and is totaly capable of resolving all the issues surrounding this in due course ... and as expedient as any other oil major could do. It is understandable that the catastrophe is devastating to the people of the US and in particular those around the GOM. However,the US media hysteria seems to be mostly driven by politics and in particular the president who seems hell bent on destroying BP as an easy British target to get his rankings higher. BP was a great British institution until it became Americanised in 1998 after merging with AMOCO and ARCO .. and in doing so probably took on an American safety culture and their assets (Texas Refinery/Alaska Pipelines/ GOM assets) that has hurt its image badly. I believe BP will come out of this stronger as a company and the shares will do the same. At current prices it's a steal!!

  • 7. Benjamin U.

    (17 June 2010, 12:30PM)  Complain about this comment

    dear Sir, this should be the best stock in the market, today. it's so sweet that i would go for long term also. the gulf spill episode is like a scare crow. i mean, we are talking about an Oil giant here.
    regards.
    Benjamin Ume.

  • 8. Bob

    (17 June 2010, 12:59PM)  Complain about this comment

    There is only a partial cap on that well.

    There is a torrent of oil pour out of there. There may well be numerous vents or cracks in the area with similar amounts of oil pouring out.

    The immense pressures, the distance under the surface of the sea means that the partial cap could go any minute. It might hold for months or years or it could go pop right now.

  • 9. Bob

    (17 June 2010, 01:03PM)  Complain about this comment

    w2w - it won;t just be the financial cost but, as it is the US, I have no doubt that people will be suing for the emotional cost, etc.

    People in Idaho, Wisconsin and so forth will probably end up suing because they had to cancel their vacations or they ate a plate of contaminated shrimp.

    It is right that BP is made to pay up for all the environmental and economic damage - what they have done is disgusting - but I am amazed by the climb in the price today as I think there is a long way to go yet in this environmental crisis.

  • 10. Peter Beresford

    (17 June 2010, 01:03PM)  Complain about this comment

    So much for our "special relationship" which on numerous occasions has been very one sided ( this situation being no different) The bailout of various U.S.A. companies following their fiscal incompetance and greed should leave the British with much to be aggrieved about - no American has been brought before our Parliament to explain their actions and apologise to the British people for the subprime crisis and its impact on our lives and our childrens lives.
    Surely their should be a dividing line between compensation ordained by law and the interference of Government who can express dismay but not use bullying tactics and blackmail against a very friendly Nation.

    Lets pull out of Afghanistan, -- Why not - they asked for our help and we gave it without question.

  • 11. oldgit

    (17 June 2010, 01:23PM)  Complain about this comment

    This is one big gamble. I had some interest in the oil industry during my working life..
    This hole in the ocean won't go away, it is spewing out oil, sand and gas under pressures of in excess of 17,000 pounds per square inch, (7 1/2 tons/sq in.)
    Which is eroding the 30,000 odd feet of drill pipe and partially sealing valves leading to the oil deposits.
    Dependent upon the efficiency of the cementing (fixing) of this pipe and the durability of the pipe there is a danger of the whole lot ripping out of the seabed. This will leave a hole which will rapidly erode. The totally unrestricted flow whch will continue until the oil deposit pressure equalises IS CATASTROPHIC. You aint seen nothing yet.
    THINK ABOUT IT.
    It could fill the whole Gulf With OIL. It could ignite, Armageddon will be a picnic in the park.
    Buy BP and sleep well?????

  • 12. alex

    (17 June 2010, 01:31PM)  Complain about this comment

    Mike I agree with you, BP isn't any different at all, it's just the same as before the spill, and if an investor is afraid to hold BP they shouldn't hold any oil major because next week the same thing could happen in a Exxon, Shell, Total rig. The difference is that the risk has been fullly priced into BPs share price.

  • 13. Mike T

    (17 June 2010, 01:36PM)  Complain about this comment

    Two Points: First, I cannot understand why all the responsibility for funding the clean-up is directed at BP. I understand that there are at least two other companies contracted to and involved in the drilling operation. Why isn't the President attacking them with equal venom and demanding a contribution from them? Could it be because they are American companies and it would not pander to the US Electorate nearly as well as standing up to a "British" company?
    And second, speaking as a pensioner, I own a few BP shares on the basis of utilising "Long Term Investment Money" in order to benefit from the dividend income. Thanks largely to Obama's over-the-top rhetoric my investment has turned into "Punting Money" and my income reduced. Should I therefore sell, accept the capital loss which completely wipes out the previous dividend income benefit or hold on? How on earth does one decide?

  • 14. BBJ

    (17 June 2010, 01:59PM)  Complain about this comment

    I tend to agree with Jane Osborne, but maybe Obama is seeing, or rather his advisers are seeing beyond their borders. With the share price being driven down, is BP being set up for a take over. Is the next step a bid from a large American Petro Company, and will we see the ownership of yet another British Institution go the way Cadburys' went. Consider then if BP went American, how would the litigation play out thereafter. ?

  • 15. alex

    (17 June 2010, 02:30PM)  Complain about this comment

    BBJ, BP is already the result of a merger between a big American oil corpoation and a British oil company. It's 40% American already. It's hardly anymore British than BHP Billiton is.

    MiktT, personally I think you might as well hold, the big price correction has happened and if there's a bounce from here you'll feel like an idiot if you sold at the bottom. Most likely the dividends will resume, and the price will bounce back.

    At current prices BP is actually worth less than the sum of it's proven reserves..............

  • 16. Paul, California USA

    (17 June 2010, 02:42PM)  Complain about this comment

    $20 is a start; but when will the US politicians Wake up to the fact that Transocean operate the rig, Haliburton installed the pipework and the faulty blowout preventer, and all are liable to pay up damages as well as other oil company partners involved. If the blowout preventer was made by Haliburton or their subcontractor they too share the cleanup costs. It seems noone has yet determined the exact reason for the blowout prfeventer failure which led to this disaster.
    Totally agree BP need some PR and a lesson in handling the US 'Kick-Ass' style politicians. Obama is behaving more like an Attorney for the prosecution than a President.

  • 17. ricardo

    (17 June 2010, 04:26PM)  Complain about this comment

    John, keep calm and carry on. It's okay for you to continue to hold BP as one of your 'boring' investments.

    Remember when you bought them ? You were in for the long haul. Right ?

  • 18. alex

    (17 June 2010, 04:36PM)  Complain about this comment

    Exactly, it's the same principle as you have with a wife.

    You've made the inital commitment, and lost some money, but you might as well sit tight as getting out of it at this stage will end up costing you even more.

    Just have a cuppa and forget about all the 'noise' which is all this is seen over the long term

  • 19. Krumble

    (17 June 2010, 06:17PM)  Complain about this comment

    BP is a buy buy buy - not only will they continue to search and discover oil but they are players in alternative energy sources, investing heavily in low carbon and bio fule products. They continue to innovate and will derive a large portion of their income from 'new products.'

    As for a M&A - then I guess you would still be looking at 400+ so overall it is worth it.

  • 20. PurpleDog UK

    (17 June 2010, 10:12PM)  Complain about this comment

    Hello all..

    Trying to make a quick buck / pound / euro got us into this in the first place.... My understanding from reading the above comments is that there is a poor awareness to the REAL global threat we all face..

    All the money in the world can save you if the planet is broken...

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100617/ap_on_re_us/us_gulf_oil_spill_marine_life

    http://www.abovetopsecret.com/deepwaterdisaster.html

    Regards
    PurpleDog UK

  • 21. Bapodra Investments

    (17 June 2010, 10:57PM)  Complain about this comment

    What would be the sensible thing to do right now when articles such as this are being printed on most investment websites? It would be to monitor the price of BP on a daily basis, "tape watch". If the price goes below £3.00 then it is def. worth getting the punting money out. I think it may make sense drip feeding money in and if the price goes further down then buying some more though this is high risk and you could end up increases your losses. I think August may be an interesting time to punt on this though if the price does go down further then def. worth considering.

  • 22. Jim

    (18 June 2010, 11:59AM)  Complain about this comment

    Having watched the grilling of Tony Hayward there are some unanswered questions which, when they come out may not be very good news.

    I suspect more should have been done with this type of well, drilling as deep as it has done is can be likened to exploring unknown territory.

    I remember watching the Blue Planet were they found life forms growing from the methane gas in that area. So as well as releasing crude oil I have a suspicion that a lot of methane is being released as well.

    As well as watching the war of words, keep an eye and an ear open for what is happening in that region.

  • 23. Sven

    (18 June 2010, 01:26PM)  Complain about this comment

    BP rarely uses insurance, choosing to cover itself from its cash reserves. Even if it were, it would also be rare for any oil & gas insurance policy to exceed $2billion in liability. BP will have to shell out.

  • 24. JR Ewing

    (22 June 2010, 04:44PM)  Complain about this comment

    The one thing to consider is that although BP is getting a public hammering right now, Obama will have been advised that he should now tread carefully.
    Its alright the Americans blaming 'British Petroleum' but now they have had their say and if they are not careful, home truths will start to flow quicker than the well itself and we all know the Americans don't do self criticism.
    The service companies and the rig operators are the ones in control of the rig, not BP, and the large majority of these are American firms. Also the US authorities have been upping the pressure on these companies for years to step up production without increasing costs.
    BP should now see things turning in their favour and the US government may also now start working with BP, rather than against them.
    Is BP worth a punt ?
    I think so but you may have to forget about your investment for 3 -5 years before you start seeing a good gain.

  • 25. Bobby Ewing

    (23 June 2010, 02:03PM)  Complain about this comment

    I agree.

    Besides if the Obama administration actually went as far as to ruin BP, no one would ever buy the bonds or equity of any oil major ever again. Because the reality is that this incident could happen to any oil exploration company at any time.

    They wouldn't just ruin BP, they'd eventually ruin the entire industry by starving it of funding. And even Cliff Barns wouldn't be that stupid.



  • 26. J.R. Ewing

    (26 June 2010, 07:45AM)  Complain about this comment

    We are all looking for the bottom line here, fact is that the leak is not properly plugged yet & is still spewing substantial amounts of crude into the ocean, in about 1 month just before the relief hole is drilled i think we will be in a better place to consider the stock option, i assume the stocks will tumble more until that point when this disaster can start paying back towards some of the money lost in the clean up. Keep in mind that BP has reserves far & beyond the total value of this mess. I think end of July will be a good time to start looking at stock options & a lot of people will be punting on this one just like me. BP is solid. Be ready to BUY BUY BUY with a minimum of 12 months in Gains before levelling out.

  • 27. carl

    (27 June 2010, 09:34PM)  Complain about this comment

    I think we should pull out of Afghanistan and let the Americans fight their own stupid wars

  • 28. RPK

    (06 July 2010, 01:49PM)  Complain about this comment



    well if you got a buck or two why not i always looked at oil like oxygen everyone needs it and that says everything to me buy .

  • 29. dominic butler

    (27 July 2010, 11:07AM)  Complain about this comment

    it's all well and good for America to bring BP down,have they forgotten that Americans would bear the blunt more than any country in the world

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>