The eight-year bear market in property

By Bengt Saelensminde Sep 26, 2011

Bengt Saelensminde

Share with
friends:

Comments (34) Print this article

No topic gets British people animated like property. It goes beyond a national obsession.

The trouble is that too many of us are poisoned by past glories in this market. From the mid-nineties right up until the financial crisis of 2007, the housing market created millionaires up and down the country. And it changed us.

On Friday we looked at the characteristics of a 'sentimental investor'. That’s an investor who is impassioned, loyal and a little bit stuck in the past. I would argue that that accurately describes the average UK property investor as well.

The trouble is that sentimental investors often come unstuck. And right now there’s a classic sentimental trap that property investors need to be wary of. Today I’ll explain what that trap is. And I’ll point to four factors that could make UK property a nightmare investment for the next four years.

The second time is never as good as the first

Many sentimental investors delude themselves by thinking that the immediate returns on the investment are irrelevant. “I’m investing for the very long-term; and anyway this isn’t an investment – it’s a home”

Of course there’s merit in that sentiment. Quite rightly there’s a very special place in our hearts for the bricks, mortar and slate that provide our shelter.

But for most of us, a house is most certainly an investment too – and a big one at that. You just can’t escape this reality. I bet many homeowners are relying on housing equity to provide some funds for their eventual retirement. And even if they’re not, the local councils certainly are!

After a savage ten years in the stock market, many investors will be hopeful for another run in the housing market. They’re encouraged by the fact that buy-to-let investment is still on the up and house prices have proved remarkably resilient throughout the financial crisis.

But this is very dangerous territory.

The trap: This bear market could drag on for years

A decent bull market takes a new generation with it. It’s almost as if the market wants to teach the new generation about the merits of a particular sector or asset type.

So you end up with long bull markets in anything from gold, industrial commodities, stocks, and, yes, houses. Some cycles are longer than others and hoover up more devotees.

But once the great bull is done for, it can grind downwards for years. And after it has, it can take decades to come back into vogue. That's the trap. The second time around is rarely as satisfying. And especially not this time.


Report FREE report: Two ways to turn Europe's crisis into an opportunity

  • Reveals the true level and extent of the European financial crisis and what this means for your money.

  • Details actions Bengt recommends to protect your wealth and profit from the impending gloom.


Four factors that could destroy the housing market

The clear and present danger is interest rates. Even with rates pegged to the floor, house prices are barely treading water.

At the moment, the markets seem to be impressed with the UK’s financial stewardship. They’re happy to let us all borrow at an incredibly sympathetic interest rate. But things can change quickly in the financial markets. Let’s not forget that our economy is vulnerable to a massive banking industry.

Eurozone trouble will inevitably lead to trouble for our oversized banking industry. Who knows exactly how things will pan out, but an emergency rise in rates will throttle the housing market.

That’s the worst-case scenario. But even if rates stay low, mortgages are still tough to find – most of the banks want to shrink their loan books. On top of that, the FSA has promised to crack down on the size of mortgages they’ll allow our banks to lend homebuyers. New rules and regulations make the loose lending of bygone years impossible.

But maybe a bear market in houses will have nothing to do with lending and interest rates.

I read in the Telegraph on Friday that estate agents reckon a third could be knocked off some house prices if the government’s new planning regulations are adopted. Basically, the government wants to get rid of the many of the restrictions that currently stand in the way of new developments.

UK housing has been under-supplied for decades. If the government can change this dynamic, it’ll surely have a negative effect on prices.

I am also concerned about demographic changes. Immigration has undoubtedly fuelled demand for homes. But immigration is likely to slow and possibly even reverse. Whether that’s down to government policy, or the fact that the UK is no longer quite so attractive to migrants remains to be seen.

Markets can crash (as I think likely with a sudden rise in rates), or they can grind down slowly as economic forces and long-term changes slowly take effect. And in the case of housing, the market can even flat-line for years while inflation takes a chunk out of it’s real value.

Why we need an eight-year bear market in property

I know that times are incredibly tough for stock market investors right now. And the outlook doesn’t exactly look rosy.

It’s therefore tempting to head for the perceived safety of housing investment. A market that looks incredibly resilient.

But I think that could be a costly mistake. Up-sizing, or putting your savings down on a buy-to-let right now looks to me like a risky move. It’s a classic trap for sentimental type investors.

This market has got to play hard-ball with the latest generation of housing bulls. History suggests we need an eight-year bear market to drain off the over-exuberance built up during the 16-year bull. That means it’s four years down and another four to go.

• This article is taken from the free investment email The Right side. Sign up to The Right Side here.

Important Information
Your capital is at risk when you invest in shares - you can lose some or all of your money, so never risk more than you can afford to lose. Always seek personal advice if you are unsure about the suitability of any investment. Past performance and forecasts are not reliable indicators of future results. Commissions, fees and other charges can reduce returns from investments. Profits from share dealing are a form of income and subject to taxation. Tax treatment depends on individual circumstances and may be subject to change in the future. Please note that there will be no follow up to recommendations in The Right Side.

Managing Editor: Frank Hemsley. The Right Side is issued by MoneyWeek Ltd.

MoneyWeek Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. FSA No 509798. http://www.fsa.gov.uk/register/home.do

Comments (34)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Richard

    (26 September 2011, 04:38PM)  Complain about this comment

    I agree with your sentiment. I have been a relative value fixed income trader for almost twenty five years and have learned that there are three rules to a good trade or investment. Timing, timing and timing; Without question the best time to buy an asset is in a bear market from a distressed seller. I believe we are in a bear market (London commuting excepted) and it will only take the slightest increase by the MPC to distress the market, however providing one is sensible with his purchase price a rising Libor will provide ample opportunities to purchase housing assets with a great yield.

    If only tenants paid in silver though.....

  • 2. Simon Shinerock

    (26 September 2011, 05:00PM)  Complain about this comment

    I know you probably believe what you are saying but in my opinion you have badly misread the situation. Most importantly all 'property' from an investment point of view can't be lumped together in the UK market. like stocks and shares, some will go up and some will go down. If you have cash at the moment, I think gold and commodities are a losers lottery, shares are the preserve of the wealthy and buy to let property is the only way for average Joe to get ahead.

  • 3. modsa

    (26 September 2011, 05:03PM)  Complain about this comment

    I lived through most of the 20's & 30's and I agree completely with this article. If anything this will be worse than that period as then we at least had a war chest. Our politicians have dissipated our reserves in war already so there will be no hope of a quick recovery . I the period after the 39-45 war America came to the aid of an impoverished Europe but there is little chance of that happening now. Their problems are nearly as bad as ours. It may be necessary to buy a house if it is precisely what you need and want but profit, forget it.

  • 4. James

    (26 September 2011, 05:05PM)  Complain about this comment

    It's wide sweeping statements like this that get markets into bad situations in the first place. I will agree that excessive and irresponsible lending has largely been the cause of the housing market problem however, under supply? How about some figures on that? - the supply is there, it's just expensive. Why? excessive lending.

    Imagine stating all stocks were a bad bet right now because the FTSE is taking a thrashing? It isn't, and there are good stocks worth investing in - it just requires a bit more research and thought before diving in.

    By the way - how is the constant "buy into gold" program going now that we regularly see on here?

  • 5. P

    (26 September 2011, 05:10PM)  Complain about this comment

    Well, if all else fails I'm in favour of residential property being taxed to the hilt so that nobody will ever again think of it as any better an investment than a tin of beans.

  • 6. Bluesilver

    (26 September 2011, 05:56PM)  Complain about this comment

    ".. If the government can change this dynamic, it’ll surely have a negative effect on prices."

    um...! if anyone can "change this dynamic" it will be nothing short of a miracle. UK is a tiny island. Even if the UK shut borders today it will take a lot longer than 4years for a significant number of those people to be inspired to leave and return to their own struggling countries and uproot their children etc. There are so many other factors as well. I don't believe it is remotely possible for there to be a significant drop in house prices due to decline in demand in the next four years.
    "sentimental investor"? -is a deluded shopper in my view :)

  • 7. Bluesilver

    (26 September 2011, 06:09PM)  Complain about this comment

    p.s. buy-to-let landlords will just pass on any rising costs to the poor tenants. It's just the way it is. I really dont think there is going to be a drop in rental demand in the next four years either. If we get significant inflation and we have 80% mortgages -rents and everything else goes up but your debt stays the same doesn't it?

    I do worry about interest rates though!

  • 8. Phil Parry

    (26 September 2011, 06:44PM)  Complain about this comment

    There are a lot of IFs in this. In particular "if the Government can change this dynamic" (the undersupply of housing). That is an enormous IF. The demographics alone dictate that about 200,000 new homes a year need to be built - currently it is about half that figure. The average age of buying the first home will soon be 40. No one wants to live with their mum and dad until they are 40 - so people rent. That, coupled with the level of immigration (reversed? I doubt that) make buy to let a sound investment. At least you get an income from it, which is more than you do with gold.

  • 9. Anthony

    (26 September 2011, 07:12PM)  Complain about this comment

    Hi,

    Yes housing is stupidly expensive mostly due to Government meddling. History shows rates should be 6% or more. Houses are likely to go back to normal when rates do.

    Buy some more gold meantime even if you had a slight accident on the pyramid. It may drop more, if so buy more. I believe its true value is going to emerge in due course. What's a house worth in gold, no borrowing allowed? Be interested to know what others think.

  • 10. LR

    (26 September 2011, 07:51PM)  Complain about this comment

    You must add in the reality that property is priced at 6.5 times average income today.
    The very long term (in fact all time) average is 3.5 times this average salary.
    This alone should be a strong indicator that the prices will indeed flatline in a stable interest rate market, and in a rising interest rate market you will see falls.
    My guess is the average or long term mean will overshoot. So you could be looking at an average price falling from £168K to £85K.

  • 11. Anthony

    (26 September 2011, 08:16PM)  Complain about this comment

    Didn't mention the 3.5 times. I remember it being 3.0 and monthly mortgage cost being limited to 25% of total income. That'd bring more overshoot. 3.5 is a fair bet in the long run though, I'd say

  • 12. Jonny Boy

    (26 September 2011, 08:59PM)  Complain about this comment

    Hmmm, I always chuckle when I hear the 'UK is a tiny island' line. It is a bit like 'they are not making any more land' I have spent quite a lot of time flying around the UK, I can confirm that it is not a tiny island and that there is plenty of land available for new houses to be built on. It just takes a bit of political will, and it appears that the Tories are grasping that bull by the horns.

    The only reason that prices have not been allowed to crash in the UK is because it will make our banks insolvent. That is why we have such low interest rates. The government clearly knows that house prices are unsustainably high, that they need to fall and that that this represents a huge risk to the solvency of our banks. Their approach is to try to deflate the bubble gently. Will they be able to do this? I doubt it.

  • 13. Jonny Boy

    (26 September 2011, 09:00PM)  Complain about this comment

    But, a few things are fairly clear. Potential buyers now see bargains on the horizon so they are holding off buying. Housing benefit is unlikely to go up once rates start going up (the govt are aware of the fact that HB underpins a lot of landlords). There is going to be a lot more land released for house building over the next few years.

    Me? I do not own a house as I live overseas. However, I will be a cash buyer when I eventually return to the UK and I fully expect to pick up a house (probably off a ‘distressed’ BTL vendor) for 20%-30% less than it would be advertised for (not sell, hah hah, nothing is selling….) today.

    Happy days.

  • 14. JAW

    (26 September 2011, 09:33PM)  Complain about this comment

    The Daily Telegraph quote that estate agents believe that the government's planning policy changes could reduce some property prices by a third is merely propaganda. The Daily Telegraph editorial is presently running a campaign against the liberation of national planning policy on the grounds that it is defending the Green Belt and the life-style interests of its rural readership sojourning in the Shires.

    The DT is trying to rouse the Tory grass roots against the planning changes, and what better manipulation of the mind of the property owning classes could there be than to claim Cameron is going to knock 33% off the price of your house? And Bengt is intelligent enough to see through the sleight, but I guess he quotes it because it aligns with own his thesis that property is about to experience a bear market?

    The truth?... prices decline very slowly for 3 years then upwards again.

  • 15. P.Helix

    (26 September 2011, 10:24PM)  Complain about this comment

    In the past, it was a single person's salary that was paying for the family home, the wife was bringing up the family and was maybe working part time.

    Forward a few decades.. and you find the family is now a house hold with 2 breadwinners.

    So the average house now being 6.5x a person's salary isn't far off.. from the truth, where you account for the salary of the household, not just a single person.

    The sad thing is the fact that you need both parents to work to just get onto the property ladder.

  • 16. charlesdb

    (27 September 2011, 08:28AM)  Complain about this comment

    It's my belief that we are in for a period of prolonged inflation.
    So property and shares are the things to be in - yes, for the long term.
    I have been wating for 3 years for property to crash here in London and it hasn't happened. I am beginning to believe it won't , but of course there is still hope; but I take Money Week's articles on property with sceptisism.
    The only assett to come out of the inflation positively in 1920's Germany, were property and shares.

  • 17. NoBull

    (27 September 2011, 09:26AM)  Complain about this comment

    Helix - this argument that households now have 2 breadwinners so that changes the paradigm of property prices is nonsense for the following reasons:

    1. There's nothing new about women going out to work (not sure what century you're living in, but two-worker households were quite common in the 80s and 90s....)

    2. The total number of jobs in the economy is currently declining, so even if there are more 2-income households that can only be at the expense of other households having no income at all - and benefit changes mean those no-income households won't have their mortgages paid by the taxpayer for much longer...

  • 18. Moneyweek Armageddon Again

    (27 September 2011, 09:56AM)  Complain about this comment

    Moneyweek has been down on the housing market since Merryn Somerset Webb (Editor) predicted house prices would crash in 2004. They haven't really been proven correct yet (other than a minor correction) and, as they freely admit, this article is based on supposition and guesswork.

  • 19. JCB

    (27 September 2011, 10:11AM)  Complain about this comment

    I sold gold and stocks in July 2011 and bought property having sold to rent in October 2006. £500k got me 10 acres and 5800 sq ft stone buildings with sea views about 10 miles out of St Andrews, with a need to spend about £100k to finish it all off. I see value in that, and whilst I anticipate the value may fall further, I'm a lot happier in property now than I am in gold, stocks, cash or anything else I can think of. It is the least worst option I feel. I'm wondering if Moneyweek is my contrarian indicator?

  • 20. Risk Monkey

    (27 September 2011, 03:53PM)  Complain about this comment

    Clearly property has two elements of income, the potential for growth in value and equity and the cash flow YIELD. Every property investor will have cash flow nailed before they buy, if they don't then they are bonkers and probably not professionals. Doesn't matter what happens to overall values if your cash flow is positive. Especially in the face of rising rents = even more cash flow. Its unfortunate that Joe Public places emphasis on the latter.

    Investors with cash are picking up the cash flow bargains that have started to emerge and will accelerate in coming years as prices fall - credit conditions ease. Buy to let mortgages can be had for 80% now up from around 60% two years ago if one looks hard enough.

    You would serve us better to show us how to do our best by the market rather then out and out avoidance due to market averages. I take it you still expect us to buy yielding defensives stocks despite the downside risks to the stock market as a whole?

  • 21. Ambon

    (27 September 2011, 04:00PM)  Complain about this comment

    @NoBull

    You're right but you forgot number 3:

    3. It is a misnomer that the average household income for 2 working adults is the average individual income multiplied by 2, i.e. 2 x £26,000 = £52,000.

    Typically one of the adults will earn a lot less than average (part time, less skilled, less overtime, etc.) In fact the average household income is £33,000. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Income_in_the_United_Kingdom)

    So rather than 3 x £52,000 = £156,000 (another 5% fall) being a fair average house price, it's much more like, 3 x £33,000 = £99,000 (another 40% fall)

  • 22. Boris Macdonut

    (27 September 2011, 08:15PM)  Complain about this comment

    #21 Ambon. There are 25 million households in the UK and there is £15o0 billion of GDP. Income per household is therefore £60,000pa.
    You mistake pay/earnings for income. Income comes from a variety of sources. According to HMRC only 67% of UK income is pay. There are also pensions,inheritances,trust funds,rent,gambling winnings,savings,investments,windfalls etc..

  • 23. JohnnyBoy

    (27 September 2011, 11:58PM)  Complain about this comment

    Risk Monkey - yield is all very well but most BTL mortgages are variable rate. Yields that make sense now will not make sense when rates return to normal.

  • 24. JohnnyBoy

    (27 September 2011, 11:58PM)  Complain about this comment

    Most of the BTL places my friends have 'invested' in yield about 5%, gross. They bought them because they thought they would achieve capital appreciation. This has not happened, but they have been pleasantly surprised by the reduction in IRs and have consequently ‘got lucky’ with regard to yield. However, low IRs will not last forever. When they start to rise, most of the BTL people will be toast, the property value will be less than the mortgage amount and their mortgage payments will be significantly higher than the rent. The idea that they can jack the rent up is farcical. Tenants will not pay ever increasing rents, they will adapt by adopting behaviors like house sharing and living with parents. When that happens, house prices will crash. After the crash, new entrants will enter the market, buying lower cost properties. They will be able to SIGNIFICANTLY undercut the BTL ‘investors’ who purchased at the top of the boom

  • 25. JohnnyBoy

    (28 September 2011, 12:03AM)  Complain about this comment

    And no doubt at this point all these BTL guys will post about how they are ‘achieving’ 8/9/10% yields on their latest purchases. This will inevitably involve leasing the properties to LHA benefit recipients. What they are not factoring in is that many of these tenants will withhold the rental money they receive from the LHA. And they will also trash the property, meaning you need to budget for a new kitchen/bathroom/carpets every three years. When you budget for these additional factors, the numbers do not stack up…….

  • 26. Mark

    (29 September 2011, 11:56AM)  Complain about this comment

    The historic average for interest rates is not as high as 6% (UK last 300 years). Also after 1930s it took until 1950+ for bank base rate to rise above 2%...

  • 27. Mark

    (29 September 2011, 12:04PM)  Complain about this comment

    Jonny Boy As a Landlord my experience is the opposite to the picture you paint. I started in 2003, so had no advantage of 90s cheap prices and bought at the low end of the market to give a good yield (aimed for 12% gross) and did all hard work myself.

    I ignored capital values and growth (using 12% yield rule price took care of itself) as that seems irrelevant and yes I have struck it lucky with the incredible low BOE rates. BOE would have to be at 10% before I would feel the pain... I also hold Silver and Gold as a hedge against high IR rates - bought when it was still sensibly priced...

  • 28. Mark

    (29 September 2011, 12:10PM)  Complain about this comment

    To clarify a 12% gross yield in rental terms means as an example: if you buy a property for 45k do up costs of 5k and rent for £500 a cal month you achieve a gross 12% yield...

    It is simple to calculate just knock a zero off the property price (factoring in do up costs).. and that is the monthly rent needed to achieve 12%...

  • 29. Waiting patiently!

    (29 September 2011, 05:02PM)  Complain about this comment

    It makes me laugh to hear the property evangelists still banging the drum about shortage of supply because someone in a seminar titled 'Buy to Let - earn your first million' said thats what it's all about. We would all live in mansions if we could but...oh yes I remember...we can't afford them and the banks won't lend us enough to buy them. For a laugh, take a look on Rightmove at properties within a five mile radius of Widecombe-in-the-moor in Devon worth over a million. Most of them have been on the market for well over two years now. Ask yourself also why that many people, apparently with that much money are all having to sell now. Wake up and smell the coffee! No-one has any money left...least of all the banks!

  • 30. Skitter

    (29 September 2011, 06:43PM)  Complain about this comment

    Putting aside the prime residential markets , the mainstream markets are undergoing serious change. The average first time buyer age has been moving ever higher and now stands at 38. In 1960 it was 23. There are two significant factors in this.
    One is equity. In the past it was genuinely possible to save for a deposit, but the sums are now so huge and life is so expensive that this has all but been eliminated for the average person. Saving has been replaced by deregulated lending which enabled borrowers to take much greater risks to get on the ladder, (some got away with it and some have not - its all about timing) and for the fortunate few, the Bank of Mum and Dad releasing equity down the generations for a down payment. The second is flexibly available finance. Without either equity and/or finance, guess what? You have to rent, and rents have risen in mainstream London by an average of 14% in the last 12 months.

  • 31. Skitter

    (29 September 2011, 06:45PM)  Complain about this comment

    So, the key questions are: where is the equity going to come from in the future, and if all avenues of equity are exhausted, will there be enough rental stock for the unfortunates who cannot buy? The answer to the first is difficult but basically, the property buying world will divide even more sharply around equity into the ‘Haves’ and the Have Not’s’. High levels of flexibly available finance are a thing of the past so this will not be a route into property ownership and I do not buy the argument that low interest rates are all that currently remain between survival and property Armageddon. The Bank rate may be 0.5% but how many people do you know who have a mortgage rate of less than 4 - 5%? Even if a borrower started out with a fantastic deal of say, 0.3% above base, most of these have now expired so the costs are not much different from what they have been for the past 10 years.

  • 32. Skitter

    (29 September 2011, 06:46PM)  Complain about this comment

    The question is whether Banks will continue to demand 3.5% +margins on lending when the Bank rate does rise? If they do, then their loan books will collapse in a sea of delinquent loans. In my view, it would be sensible to push responsibility for the survival of the market onto the Banks rather than handing them a seriously cushy 3.5% margin. This would enable savers to get back to saving; something which has been long forgotten.

  • 33. Skitter

    (29 September 2011, 06:47PM)  Complain about this comment

    What really effects property prices and yields are really big swathes of unemployment leaving property empty but this has not been mentioned in the article. Unemployment is the killer that creates a wasteland out of property. Moneyweek has been emphasizing the need to invest defensively into yield blue chips, and the point here is yield. The frantic search for growth in UK and Europe is all but over. Just as investment in property as experienced spectacular growth upto 2007, I suspect that yield from property will become the driver of the future.

  • 34. Sea Bass

    (30 September 2011, 09:40PM)  Complain about this comment

    ".....the market can even flat-line for years while inflation takes a chunk out of it’s real value." You need to look at it from a different angle. As a homeowner, I've only put down 10% (my own cash) ..... inflasion is slowly grinding away at the remaining 90% (bank debt). This debt (£200K) is fixed to 2005 levels. Essentially by the time I get around to paying that debt, inflasion will have screwed us all so that a tin of beans will cost almost £200k. Inflation punishes savers and rewards spenders.....

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


>