Your best shot at inflation-beating investment income

By Bengt Saelensminde Oct 19, 2011

Bengt Saelensminde

Share with
friends:

Comments (18) Print this article

Today’s issue will likely be divisive. Some readers will dismiss what I’m saying out of hand and I’m prepared for some animated discussion on the comments page.

That’s OK. Debate is good. A clash of opinions is what makes a market, after all.

Here’s what’s on my mind. Then you can tell me what you think.

Lately, there’s been a lot of scare mongering, moaning and bleating about inflation. Things like “Inflation is on its way to hyperinflation…”, “I’ve been robbed by the government…” and the classic “Quantitative easing is counterfeiting…”

Frankly, I’m fed up with all that moaning. Let’s take a close look at what’s really going on. And rather than complaining about ‘getting robbed’ – let’s first understand the situation so that we can learn to live with what’s thrown at us.

Mervyn King’s brilliant double bluff

You probably saw the news headlines yesterday. UK consumer price index (CPI) inflation has now topped 5.2%.

To be honest, I’m a little surprised. I’ve long held the view that we’d see some deflationary forces coming into play this year. That hasn’t happened.

I’ll admit inflation is a devilishly difficult thing to forecast. There are just so many factors at play. Sure, loose monetary policy and the low pound stirred up inflation through higher import costs. But there’s more to it than that.

First, there’s the seemingly insatiable demand for commodities from the East. In fact, if oil stays in its current range, then 2011 will be the most expensive year ever for energy. Then there’s the rising labour costs coming out of the East too, pushing up export prices. And to top it all off, weak Western currencies add another layer of cost to our imports.

But probably the biggest unknown and unquantifiable factor behind inflation is investor and consumer psychology.

Now here’s where some Right Siders are going to disagree with me. But hear me out.

I’d argue that the central bankers played an absolute blinder with investor and consumer psychology. And in doing so, they’ve turned around a devastating situation.

Cast your mind back to 2008. You’ll remember that investors and consumers thought the world was about to drop off the edge of a cliff. Nobody was buying. Nobody was investing. Economies ground to a halt.

All of a sudden, central bankers were faced with tanking financial markets, deflating GDP and deflating prices. They had to force a change in sentiment.

And they did!

Bank policy rates were slashed. Money was pumped into the markets by buying government bonds with freshly minted cash. They claimed this was in an effort to bring down interest rates and get money flowing through the economy again.

Fine – but to turn the economy around they needed more.

And to do this, they played a brilliant double-bluff: central banks insisted they didn’t want to risk inflation. They made it clear that they wanted a strong dollar/pound/whatever. But in reality, this rhetoric only convinced people we’d get the opposite.

What do you do if you think your cash is going to be worth less in the future? You go out and spend it now. And that has a positive effect on inflation – or at least it helps stop outright deflation.

Nobody can quantify the psychological effect inflation expectations had and are having. But my guess is it’s the main reason we’re not suffering deflation today.


Special report

An exclusive report from The Right Side
"Bankrupt Britain?"


Why central banks saved us from a far worse fate

Just think about exactly what life was like during the worst of the crisis in 2008 and early 2009. The economy was going backwards. Nearly everyone was facing losses.

At the depths of the crisis, investments were stuck in a nasty downtrend. Pensions and general stock market savings were getting mauled. But just look at the recovery we’ve had – and central bank actions have had a lot to do with it. Sure there’s been some inflation induced losses on cash – but just look at how the rest of your portfolio has recovered.

People moan about all those 'profligate debtors' that have been let off. But let’s just consider what would have happened if businesses and individuals were pushed to the brink of collapse.

The economy would have collapsed too. Paper assets (save cash) would have continued their depression-like descent. Would that have been a worthwhile sacrifice to get a few extra points of interest on cash?

And so what if the ‘Government is attempting to inflate its way out of debt’? Let us just remember whose debt this is. It’s the debt of the nation. If it wasn’t being eroded by inflation, then we’d have to pay the difference through tax. And that would be bound to hit wealth holders hardest – I mean you can’t tax people that haven’t got any money!

Of course, there are winners and losers from the whole inflation/deflation situation. I don’t deny that some people are hurting.

But it strikes me that a little bit of inflation is a worthwhile sacrifice for keeping us from a deflationary debt spiral. For all those that moan about how inflation has hit them, let us just remember what the alternative might have been.

This isn’t the time for moaning. We have higher inflation than any of us would like, let’s deal with it. I’m working on some new ideas for protecting and growing your wealth in this climate. Keep reading The Right Side in the weeks ahead to hear about those.

Meantime, to start with, own some gold. Although gold doesn’t pay an income, it’s the best protection we’ve got against the central bankers losing control of their psychological games. If their bluff works too well, then we really will have an inflation problem – and gold’s credentials as a store of value will be invaluable.

Start using stocks to beat inflation

To get your money earning an income that stands a fighting chance of beating inflation, consider good quality dividend paying stocks. New research out from Capita this week said UK dividends are at three-year highs – up 16.9% on 2010.

Capita Registrar’s CEO, Charles Cryer, said: “Dividends are growing faster than we expected as UK firms shrug off the worst stock market conditions since 2008 and continue to increase payouts to shareholders.

“In real terms they still have some way to go to top previous highs, but investors will be grateful that at least one asset class is providing a solid, inflation-proof income.”

My colleague Stephen Bland says big companies are best placed to do this for you. He’s built an income strategy around them. Learn how you can use it here.

And I’ll be back with some more ideas soon.

• This article is taken from the free investment email The Right side. Sign up to The Right Side here.

Important Information
Your capital is at risk when you invest in shares - you can lose some or all of your money, so never risk more than you can afford to lose. Always seek personal advice if you are unsure about the suitability of any investment. Past performance and forecasts are not reliable indicators of future results. Commissions, fees and other charges can reduce returns from investments. Profits from share dealing are a form of income and subject to taxation. Tax treatment depends on individual circumstances and may be subject to change in the future. Please note that there will be no follow up to recommendations in The Right Side.

The Dividend Letter is a regulated product issued by MoneyWeek Ltd. Forecasts are not a reliable indicator of future results. Your capital is at risk when you invest in shares, never risk more than you can afford to lose. Please seek independent financial advice if necessary. MoneyWeek Ltd. Customer Services: 0207 633 3780.

Managing Editor: Frank Hemsley. The Right Side is issued by MoneyWeek Ltd.

MoneyWeek Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. FSA No 509798. http://www.fsa.gov.uk/register/home.do

Comments (18)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. eddiegeorge

    (19 October 2011, 05:09PM)  Complain about this comment

    Hi Bengt, In my opinion it is irresponsible to support government and central bank action thusfar since 2008. I don't have data for the UK, but the situation must be similar to the US where $2trillion of real debt was created for a negligible increase in GDP. this is an appaling investment, and I am sure the UK QE didn't do any better. We are in a severe credit reversal cycle and need to conserve what we can for the tougher days ahead, not burn even more money at the altar of dreadful investments. What little wealth is left needs to be invested in real value adding manufacturing enterprise, not fed to the speculative wealth destroying financial sector raging out of control for the past two decades.

  • 2. Noel Falconer MEcon

    (19 October 2011, 05:20PM)  Complain about this comment

    Bengt, you've been brainwashed.

    Basic economics: price is the relationship between the amount of money buying and the amount of resources selling. Increase the first disproportionately and you raise prices, it's that simple.

    Hundreds of billions have been poured into the coffers of the banks; where they (mostly) stayed - the loan famine - at once not stimulating the economy and not causing inflation. Great - except that they still exist, and will do both when they leak. The potential for disaster is enormous. And our only protection is the bleating of people like Sir Mervyn King. And increasing numbers of people are coming round to my view that his forename should be Matilda (who cried 'Fire' till folk only answered 'Little Liar!').

  • 3. DP

    (19 October 2011, 05:43PM)  Complain about this comment

    Hyperinflation is not "inflation on steroids". It is a collapse in confidence in the currency. The goods don't get more expensive in real terms as they are bid up ever-higher by more and more money, no the currency is deemed worth less in world markets and the prices of goods and services in that currency go up as a result.

    Secondly, Quantitative Easing is not creating a larger supply of broad money in the system, it is converting the Quality of already existing money. Converting failing credit money into new base money instead. To make savers in the banking system come out whole and prevent a banking death spiral. So, we can see that the QE is swapping out money that was going to money heaven otherwise, and therefore to talk about more money in the system chasing up prices is not relevant.

    However, if you were to talk instead of a higher velocity of money, then you might be going somewhere more interesting.

  • 4. DP

    (19 October 2011, 05:49PM)  Complain about this comment

    Conversely, the problem for now is that people are fearful and unwilling to spend money. Velocity is dropping. This is another reason to QE in money -- to try to keep prices out of deflation by offsetting the low velocity with some additional volume.

    Velocity is the deflationary problem today. Some day in the future it'll turn around quickly and also be an inflationary problem too.

  • 5. DP

    (19 October 2011, 05:53PM)  Complain about this comment

    If any of your ladies here would like to really understand what is happening in the world of money today, you could do a LOT worse that spend some time reading the posts at FOFOA's blog, IMO.

    You might even start here: http://fofoa.blogspot.com/2010/09/just-another-hyperinflation-post.html

  • 6. Leslie Martin

    (19 October 2011, 08:05PM)  Complain about this comment

    Excellent analysis, Bengt. Well done. All we have, all we'll ever have, is ourselves. "Money" is just a shorthand way of referring to the cultural take on this (the common currency if you like). That is why "the meaning of money" is so hard to pin down: it depends on the psychology of the moment. When the moment has passed it's too late to come up with a working definition. We are the definition. Our money is us and we ought to be able to do what we damn well like with it. If you believe in original sin then money is the root of all evil and we are going to hell in a handcart. And then there are the optimists - the ones who benefit when there is a preponderance of pessimism. Would you say we're seeing a lot of optimism at the moment?

  • 7. ubear

    (20 October 2011, 12:20AM)  Complain about this comment

    1. to 5. Good Points

    6. We have a mere fiat fractional-reserve debt-based currency, not valuable debt-free Money, that is why we are in the current mess.

    The UK is probably like the USA, accelerating underlying M3 deflation, due to accelerating debt deflation which is being deceitfully hidden by BoE and FED QE; unfortunately this does not fix the root cause, thus the BoE had to do yet more QE recently.

    The USA and UK will likely eventually see deflation emerge with a vengeance and if there is not the will to fix our currency properly (e.g. Positive Money), QE will likely go into overdrive and trigger such a loss of confidence that Hyperinflation erupts!

    One good piece of advice was to buy Gold, given the new position limits on Comex Gold and Silver etc. will likely put a rocket under them after the coming volatility from the Big players downsizing their huge short positions.

  • 8. Ian Chapple

    (20 October 2011, 08:40AM)  Complain about this comment

    This is Bengt simply trying to justify his belief in deflation. I do not believe the bank of England is clever enough to try a double bluff. We should have let the banks and their bloated investment arms go to the dogs!

  • 9. Jack

    (20 October 2011, 09:41AM)  Complain about this comment

    Requiring debt repayment is not a financial decision, it is a moral decision. Bailing the imprudent out at the expense of the prudent is morally wrong.
    If you believe in the socionomic model of society (Elliott wave theory) then the mood of the world is approaching a serious decline and there is nothing any central bank can do about it. All the money created by QE will disappear in the collapse of asset values. We will get deflation.
    If the banks create more money during this period, when mood turns up, then we will get inflation.

  • 10. Simon Hall

    (20 October 2011, 10:19AM)  Complain about this comment

    A bit of inflation is good for the economy, it means business can charge more for their goods/service in the future than they are charging today. If it were the other way round, there would be no incentive to hold stock, as the price you buy it for now could well be more than you are able to sell it for in the future, i.e. no profit or even a loss.

    It therefore follows that investing in companies that sell things will do well from inflation, providing they sell things that people want/need. That's why Warren Buffett is buying Tesco shares right now.

    Gold on the other hand is only any good if people are scared of the alternative, which they are at the moment, but when they collectively realise that money is here to stay gold will plummet, back to its real value which is what people will pay for jewellery.

  • 11. Crack

    (20 October 2011, 11:51AM)  Complain about this comment

    Oh dear. Apart from DP, only ubear here is even close to having a clue what is gonna happen. You should take the advice of DP and spend some time with the content at the FOFOA blog.

  • 12. CKP

    (20 October 2011, 02:46PM)  Complain about this comment

    Mervyn King and the BoE are a bunch of bandits, getting pensioners and savers to pay for the leveraged sins of reckless bonus chasing bankers and greedy property speculators. Meanwhile all is well in the BoE fiefdom whose pension assets were conveniently switched to index-linked investments shortly before QE began in earnest. These morally corrupt lot need to have their interests aligned with the rest of us.

  • 13. VIKING RAIDER

    (20 October 2011, 09:12PM)  Complain about this comment

    BENGT
    What do you make of Mervs comment we are in solvency crisis not a liquidity crisis. That comment worried me, I thought does he mean a soveriegn default is imminent?

  • 14. Clyde Frog

    (21 October 2011, 11:20AM)  Complain about this comment

    @CKP - thank heavens we have the ECB standing here defiantly sticking a finger in the Fed/BoE's dollar-system dinner, aligning themselves with the interests of the rest of us and preparing the whole world for a return to a more equitable global reserve system in the very near future! Yipeee! :-)

    @Viking Raider - yes, absolutely.

    By the way, I also have read some of FOFOA. It is very interesting, I think you will agree. Although I have to admit I don't yet really understand a lot of it - but the more I read the more it makes sense. Which is nice.

  • 15. DP

    (21 October 2011, 11:43AM)  Complain about this comment

    Does anybody have cash in any of the banks? Will their money "in the bank" be there when this wave of defaults is done and dusted?

    Are you thinking "yes it will, because of the government's guarantee to depositors"? OK, so now consider where all the money to make good on that guarantee comes from... [whispered hint: QE - shhhhh! ;) ]

    ...

  • 16. DP

    (21 October 2011, 11:44AM)  Complain about this comment

    ...

    Serious deflation could only happen if the debt money was not returned to the banks and made available to the poor innocent depositors, the broad money supply massively contracted as a result. The depositor guarantees already tell you this simply WILL NOT be allowed to happen, because replacement base money WILL BE (IS BEING ... HELLLLLO?) created to put in its place.

    Deflationary collapse will not be allowed to happen (at least, not in nominal cash terms). The only possible destination is a hyperinflationary depression (which will be a massive deflation, but only when measured in REAL terms, not nominal cash terms).

    And they all lived happily ever after. The end.

  • 17. Critic Al Rick

    (21 October 2011, 10:16PM)  Complain about this comment

    They are fighting tooth & nail to stave-off a deflationary Depression, but will they succeed? IRs can't be lowered much more, if any, to offset the damage being done to 'velocity' by inflation; indeed I believe a lot of the inflation is attributable to very low BoE, in tandem with (probable) injudicious utilisation of QE.

    In consideration of the already negative Balance of Payments (the true measure of wealth creation of a nation) it's hardly sensible for wages to rise appreciably (further damaging our economy- not that they seem to care; after all money 'grows on trees' for them).

    Surely German citizens are against anything which would stoke-up inflation; they also know where real wealth comes from.

    It seems to me the 'powers that be' are between a rock and a hard place and, in the longer than short term, damned if they do and damned if they don't.

    VIKING RAIDER's final comment @ 13. may well have hit the proverbial nail squarely on its head.

  • 18. Crack

    (24 October 2011, 11:46AM)  Complain about this comment

    @VIKING RAIDER (13) Sovereign debt failures, leading to CDS payouts, leading to bank insolvencies worldwide, leading to CDS payouts, leading to insurance company insolvencies worldwide, leading to failure of CDS payouts, leading to global financial system end game. Hold onto your hats. Got cash outside of a commerical bank? GOT GOLD?

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


>