Seth Klarman - the world’s greatest living value investor

By Phil Oakley Feb 06, 2012

1

Share with
friends:

Comments (10) Print this article

Value investing - the art of buying something worth a pound for 50 pence - works. But who is its greatest practitioner?

Warren Buffett is seen by many as the world’s top value investor, and his long-term performance is certainly impressive. But is Buffett really a value investor any more? The likes of Tesco (even after the recent slump) and IBM hardly hit the classic definition of a value stock.

If you want to learn from a modern-day value investor, a better bet is Seth Klarman. Klarman doesn’t have Buffett’s profile, but he has produced annual returns of around 20% a year for nearly 30 years, simply by buying stuff that’s cheap.

Better yet, unlike your average hedge fund or private equity manager, this performance has been largely achieved without using any borrowed money (leveraging) or by betting on falling asset prices (known as shorting).

So who is Seth Klarman?

Klarman started his investment career working under top value investors Max Heine and Michael Price. After working with them for two years, he went to Harvard University to study for an MBA. On graduating in the early 1980s, he set up his company, the Baupost Group, in Boston, initially looking after the funds of wealthy families.

Apart from his investment performance, Klarman is famous for writing a book on value investing: Margin of Safety – Risk Averse Value Investing Strategies for the Thoughtful Investor. Published in 1991, the book is now out of print, but second hand copies can be found on Amazon for £1,000 or more.

Having realised that the book is giving away some of his competitive edge, it is not surprising that Klarman has no plans for a second edition.

Nine lessons to learn from Seth Klarman

So what do we know about how Klarman invests? Here are some insights into his approach.

What’s your advantage over others?

The investment markets are crowded. Thousands of professional investors spend their days trying to find the next big thing, but they can’t all win. In order to get ahead you need to do something or know something that others don’t. This is not easy. Are you really smarter than the crowd?

Buy what others are selling

Going against the crowd can be profitable. People often sell assets due to temporary, short-term factors. This offers opportunities for investors who can take a longer view. Examples of such situations are litigation, fraud, financial distress and ejection from an index.

Go where others don’t

Following on from the above two points, it makes logical sense that you are unlikely to make a lot of money buying FTSE 100 shares, as professional investors follow them too closely. Look at lots of different asset classes. For example:

• Opportunities often exist in ‘spin offs’ – smaller businesses sold by bigger companies. Professional investors often sell holdings in these companies because they are too small and this temporarily depresses their value, spelling a buying opportunity.

• Research bonds in bankrupt companies: often these bonds sell for a fraction of what they are worth. If the company is turned around, investors can make massive gains. There are often similar opportunities in distressed property.

• Don’t confine yourself to domestic markets. Foreign markets are often less crowded and can be subject to levels of political and regulatory uncertainty that present opportunities. In the preface to the sixth edition of Benjamin Graham and David Dodd's book, Security Analysis’, Klarman uses the example of South Korea in the early 2000s where investor pessimism saw multinational companies selling for as low as one or two times their annual cash flow. Smart investors made a killing buying these stocks.


Sign up for a 3-week FREE trial of MoneyWeek
and get the following free as well

"The only financial publication I could not be without."
John Lang, Director, Tower Hill Associates Ltd


Focus on risk before you start thinking about returns

Research shows the pain of losing 50% of your money far outweighs the pleasure to be had from making a 50% return. To be successful as an investor you must focus your research on the risks of a company’s business model and its industry. Remember that the first rule of investment is not to lose money. Also remember – and this is particularly pertinent to technology companies – that today’s good business may not be tomorrow’s winner (see my colleague Tim Bennett’s points on the importance of economic moats for more on this).

You are buying a stake in a business, not a piece of paper

Investment success comes from buying the cash flows of businesses for less than they are worth. These cash flows come from the real world, not punting numbers on a computer screen. So focus on free cash flow rather than profits. And look at balance sheets to see risks like too much debt or big pension fund liabilities.

Know when to sell

Value investors start selling when assets are 10-20% below what they think they are worth. Owning fully valued assets is a form of speculation – you are betting on someone paying more than they are worth, not on the market recognising the true value of the assets.

Don’t invest with borrowed money

The ability to sleep well at night is more important than a few more percentage gains.

Don’t rely on the market to provide your investment returns

If bond coupons or stock dividends (paid out by companies) can provide a large chunk of your returns, you are less reliant on fickle and volatile markets for capital gains. Buying bonds below their redemption value is another good strategy.

Don’t be afraid to do nothing

Always hold cash when cheap assets are scarce. Be prepared to wait.

How to follow Klarman

Very few private investors will be rich enough to invest in Klarman’s funds, but that doesn’t mean you can’t follow what he is doing. Every three months Baupost is obliged to file a form with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) known as a 13F (you can read it here) which lists the investments in Klarman’s $3bn fund.

His latest filing shows his main investments as of 30 September 2011.

HoldingProportion of fund
BP 16.7%
Hewlett Packard 15.7%
Viasat 11.8%
News Corp 11%
Microsoft 10%

You can see that many of the shares listed above have been battered by investor pessimism in recent years. Not all of them would have been comfortable to buy into (picking up BP in the wake of the Gulf of Mexico disaster certainly wasn’t, or News Corp’s following the hacking scandal), but that’s partly the point - Klarman’s value investing style clearly depends as much on investor psychology as on hard numbers.

However, there is no doubt that most of what he does works well. Considering the nine points noted above before you take the plunge into any asset in the future will almost certainly make you a better investor.

• We have stopped taking comments on this story due to a series of posts regarding a controversial quarry in Canada in which Seth Klarman's Baupost vehicle owns a stake. We have no house view on this subject – if you are interested in finding out more, feel free to Google "baupost megaquarry" - but the posts are not relevant to the wider topic of value investing discussed here.

Comments (10)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Non-sage

    (07 February 2012, 03:05AM)  Complain about this comment

    Baupost has significantly more than $3bn under management. As I understand it is around the $20bn mark. $3bn is the equities component, given there is distressed debt, cash, etc.

  • 2. NoMegaQuarry

    (08 February 2012, 09:58PM)  Complain about this comment

    Seth Klarman and Baupost may be revered in the US, but they're gaining a different reputation in Ontario. Baupost is behind plans to excavate the largest aggregate quarry in Canadian history at the headwaters of five rivers and on prime farmland. Water for up to one million people downstream will be impacted forever. Thousands of acres of Class 1 farmland will be destroyed. Is it the goal of value investors to devastate a landscape in search of high returns? I would like an answer from Mr. Klarman.

  • 3. Clancy

    (09 February 2012, 01:19PM)  Complain about this comment

    Rape and pillage is a value investing formula. The Ontario, Canada, MegaQuarry is a perfect example of investing without a hint of a conscience

  • 4. Louise Marcoux Phillips

    (09 February 2012, 01:23PM)  Complain about this comment

    I'm sorry but I can't join the 'Seth Klarman Admiration Society'. There is no doubt that Mr. Klarman is an intuitive investor and probably a near- genius in his field but ... when his agenda includes the devastation of a community perhaps a closer scrutiny of him, his tactics and the Baupost Group, is advisable.

    The need for limestone aggregate may be great but so is the need for fresh drinking water and food. Which has more significance and value? Ask the people who live beside the site of the Highland Company's proposed Mega-Quarry. Ask the 100's of 1,000's of Ontarians whose water and food sources will be affected by the proposed Mega-Quarry.

    This proposed investment of the Baupost Group is unconscionable on every level.



  • 5. loganberry 3

    (09 February 2012, 01:41PM)  Complain about this comment

    What Baupost, under Seth Klarman, proposes to do in Ontario is a shocking example of greed trumping common sense and a perfect reason why short term profits cannot be put before a long hard look at the possible outcomes of pillaging enormous parcels of valuable agricultural land. Six hundred million litres of water, DAILY and FOREVER, would have to be pumped out to keep the quarry floor dry. The water will then be returned to the ground, along with all the contaminants from the blasting. This is water that flows to millions of people in Ontario. Baupost lied to the community from the beginning about its intentions, has shown nothing but contempt for the community it's attempting to destroy, and will do/say anything in its quest to earn huge profits for its investors. Is this the type of business acumen we celebrate? Profit at ANY cost to the environment, to the future we're leaving for our children and grandchildren? Mr. Klarman is NO hero in Ontario.....

  • 6. Galen Brown

    (09 February 2012, 01:58PM)  Complain about this comment

    I pitty those who feel that it is ok to devastate other peoples communities around the globe to create "value" for other who do not live with the consequences. If he is an intelligent man, he has wasted it, if he is a man of values, he has lost them, if he is a man of any dignity, he has yet to show it.

    Yes, you can argue that for one man what is right is wrong and what is wrong is right, and so on and so forth - but at the end of the day, my home and my future is worth fighting for. Is Mr. Klarman's Mega Quarry in Ontario - where he does not and will never live worth that to him?

    You will no longer be allowed to destroy the livelihood under a banner of "prosperity" without facing the consequences yourself. If Ontario is not good enough for you to live in, it is not good enough for you to dig in.

  • 7. Martha Bull

    (09 February 2012, 02:27PM)  Complain about this comment

    Thanks for bringing to light the nine lessons to learn from Seth Klarman. The one that really helped me was "Don’t confine yourself to domestic markets. Foreign markets are often less crowded and can be subject to levels of political and regulatory uncertainty that present opportunities."Please follow up with an article about how to choose an ethical hedge fund. Is ethics important to value investors? Why are hedgefunds allowed an unlicenced romp across the world's untapped resources? Canada's well governed financial institutions are highly regulated. Do hedgefunds have to play by the same rules? What gives with hedgefunds? There are over 200,000 people worldwide who signed a petition asking for an environmental review of the Baupost's proposed megaquarry. There is a powerful light shining on Seth Klarman. How did you miss it?

  • 8. mulmurman

    (09 February 2012, 05:03PM)  Complain about this comment

    What can I constructively add or or say to the previous comments regarding Highland/Baupost's application to the Ontario government to establish the largest limestone quarry in Canada. Hopefully by now though your readers will have grasped that we are dealing with a cast of dodgy characters who appear to have no fear or trepidation that they would be disturbing the potable water source of perhaps millions of people with their digging. One of Highland's Principals remarked "we'll learn as we go along".
    Hopefully, Mr. Klarman will come to realise this will not be one of the best examples of his value investing ethos. And with the attendant and growing opposition and publicity, together with the various legislative hoops they have to jump through, it's time to withdraw finacial support and look for other value investment opportunities. Perhaps find some ethics and morals on the way.
    I'm not holding my breath, though.

  • 9. Minebuster

    (09 February 2012, 10:28PM)  Complain about this comment

    If you want to see what else Baupost is up to, google search "bixby ranch baupost" Value NOT Values for sure.

  • 10. Frank Futurist

    (09 February 2012, 11:38PM)  Complain about this comment

    This mega quarry, and the Bixby ranch are both watersheds. The proposed Melancthon quarry would pump 158 million gallons a day. They want to try and harness the headwaters of 6 freshwater rivers running at different temperatures, let them run across the quarry floor and back into the aquifer.

    12 years ago in Walkerton, Ontario,
    7 people perished and thousands more were affected with disease and on going health problems from a farm runoff that was 3 feet in diameter and 50 feet deep.

    That farm land was on fractured limestone. Same as Melancthon. and they want to make a 2400 acre, 200 feet deep hole. This aquifer feeds thousands of untested wells.
    Get the picture?

Commenting is now closed on this article.

>