Dumb urges will ruin your wealth

By Bengt Saelensminde Jul 25, 2012

Bengt Saelensminde

Share with
friends:

Comments (14) Print this article

The chart I’m about to show you tells you just about all you need to know about long-term investing. It may look a little complicated at first sight. But don’t worry, that’s the beauty of it!

Top asset classes over the last ten years

Asset class performance chart

(Click on the chart for a larger version)
Source: Lipper Hindsight

What on earth does this cornucopia of colour mean?

Well, this fascinating chart shows the performance over the last ten years of the nine main asset classes. The best performers of each year are at the top – and the worst at the bottom. What’s striking is the inconsistency of it all.

For instance, in my mind’s eye, I’d have had UK property (green box) pretty much near the leader-board up until the great credit crunch. But it wasn’t. In 2003 and 2005 UK property was way under par. And just look at commodities (yellow) – from hero to zero and back to hero throughout the last decade.

Most investors’ favoured asset class, UK equities (blue) have had a pretty chequered 10 years too. To be honest, the only relatively consistent performer was emerging markets (grey box) which held the number one slot for five out of the ten years. But then again it hit the bottom spot twice, too – falling by a horrifying 40% in 2008.

But the important thing this chart shows is that you don’t have a clue what the markets are going to throw at you from one year to the next. Yet we’re constantly told that asset allocation is the most important thing we can do for your portfolios. And to an extent that’s true. But guessing what the market will throw at you is clearly a tricky affair.

I guess we all have our own ideas about how the different asset classes will perform. I certainly do. But then I try to fight the urge telling me to change my portfolio accordingly. My heart may tell me to pump it all on gold – yet my brain says "no!". My heart says dump equities, but again, it’s overruled.

And fighting my urges (or investment bias) is nearly always the right thing to do. Keep a diversified portfolio at all times. The chart shows that you don’t have a clue which assets will do best over the coming year.

Sure, you can go ‘over-weight’ your favourite classes, and ‘under-weight’ the ones you don’t like. But always maintain a position.


Special report

An exclusive report from The Right Side
"Bankrupt Britain?"


My heart was wrong about equities

As spring 2009 rolled on, everything seemed to be going wrong for equities. We were still in a deadly spiral of doom. Wealth was crushed, people felt poorer, so nobody was spending on anything but essentials. Businesses were thus crushed, and stock markets continued to tank.

It was hard to see how things were going to change.

It would have been easy to capitulate and chuck in the towel on equities (and I suspect many did). But if you held your equity position, you were treated to a monster 30% rally by the time 2009 came to an end.

And here’s the thing. Today, my heart is again telling me to dump equities. Every time the euro-saga hits the headlines (and that’s pretty darned often), the markets take a plunge. And given that not only is the euro-saga likely to go on for some time, but the rest of the West has similar structural issues, then I think we can expect some torrid times to come. My heart says dump, dump, dump.

But I am not dumping equities. Sure, with a 25% position, I’m under-weight, but I’m keeping my position.

The chart tells me I have to. I cannot possibly know how this crisis (and the next one!) will play out. Who knows, it may even be good for equities.

It’s certainly not all doom and gloom for UK shares. Data released by Capita Registrars on Monday revealed that UK companies will pay out a whopping 27% more dividends this year.

Now that’s not a figure that tallies with such a feeble looking FTSE! And it should bode well for you if you’re following Stephen Bland’s simple but very effective 'extra income cheque' strategy. (Not heard about this? Check it out here.)

I’m also still keen on my UK Dividend Plus ETF (exchange traded fund), it offers you a cost effective way of getting exposure to the FTSE 350’s top 50 dividend payers. It’s currently yielding 5.9% - that’s a handy income. And who knows, maybe UK equities will take us by surprise and offer us a handy capital gain, too.

But the bottom line ‘take away’ point from today’s issue – as displayed by that multi-coloured chart at the start - is that it pays to stay diversified and stay safe.  Let me know what you think.

• This article is taken from the free investment email The Right side. Sign up to The Right Side here.

Important Information
Your capital is at risk when you invest in shares - you can lose some or all of your money, so never risk more than you can afford to lose. Always seek personal advice if you are unsure about the suitability of any investment. Past performance and forecasts are not reliable indicators of future results. Commissions, fees and other charges can reduce returns from investments. Profits from share dealing are a form of income and subject to taxation. Tax treatment depends on individual circumstances and may be subject to change in the future. Please note that there will be no follow up to recommendations in The Right Side.

The Dividend Letter is a regulated product issued by Fleet Street Publications Ltd. Your capital is at risk when you invest in shares, never risk more than you can afford to lose. Please seek independent financial advice if necessary. Fleet Street Publications Ltd. 0207 633 3600.

Managing Editor: Frank Hemsley. The Right Side is an unregulated product published by Fleet Street Publications Ltd.

Fleet Street Publications Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. FSA No 115234. http://www.fsa.gov.uk/register/home.do

Comments (14)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Rhodesian

    (25 July 2012, 04:49PM)  Complain about this comment

    Thank you Bengt for a interesting article I certainly agree with you Keep up the good sense

  • 2. canveyislander

    (25 July 2012, 04:59PM)  Complain about this comment

    Bengt Your final synopsis is on the money, as they said in 'Dad's Army' ..don't panic Mr Mannering.

  • 3. Harry's Coat

    (25 July 2012, 07:16PM)  Complain about this comment

    Bengt, with so much depending on how politicians play their hands, your balanced approach seems to be the most sensible option. I've followed your suggestion at looking at retail bonds following their mention in your articles. It's an asset class I hadn't considered before.

  • 4. SteveH

    (26 July 2012, 12:35AM)  Complain about this comment

    I've been reading monkeyonapin
    I found another version of the Lippor table, and calculated the result at the end of the 10 year period. I deducted a modest 1% each year to represent charges from everything except the cash.
    Result - Commodities nearly always on top, 130% up at the end. Then more or less even between Cash, Property, Bonds and High Yield bonds, and then the 3 equity markets a mile behind. But cash of course always went up, if you had to make a withdrawal the others could have been far worse if the timing was unlucky.

    Why don't you (Moneyweek) get Mr Monkeyonapin as a regular columnist?

  • 5. Clive

    (26 July 2012, 10:05AM)  Complain about this comment

    It highlights nicely how in many cases a top performer one year is a dog the next, and vice versa. By the way, how do you fit bonds into the table?

  • 6. bengt

    (26 July 2012, 10:31AM)  Complain about this comment

    Clive,

    That's a great point. The chart shows gilts, but completely misses an important asset class - namely corporate bonds.

    Most people miss corporate bonds - it's why I like to make a point of them. I guess in part it's because they only became available for private investors in 2010 (of course you could have held a corporate bond fund before that).

    But yes, it would be interesting to include them too... but to be honest, it would probably on just go to show that their performance would be as chequered as the rest.

    bengt

  • 7. Tom Roundhouse

    (26 July 2012, 12:13PM)  Complain about this comment

    I have to weigh in here!! The FTSE Div Plus absolutely stinks in terms of methodology and therefore performance. The basis of component selection takes no account of dividend prospects and therefore tends to include shares whose yields are high because they are under threat. The portfolio is reviewed every 3 months which means shares whose prices are recovering are kicked out while the old dogs are retained and news ones added.

    A vastly better option is the Vanguard FTSE UK Equity Income Index fund. The selection process focuses not just on how high the yield is but also on the prospects for that yield. The fund is rebalanced every six months which reduces costs. The proof of the pudding is in the eating. Check performance against the FTSE and Neil Woodford's High Income fund and you will see what I mean.

    As per Sharescope, the TER is 0.25% and the yield 5.41%. What's not to like?!

  • 8. bengt

    (26 July 2012, 01:45PM)  Complain about this comment

    Tom,

    You're wrong. This is an exerpt from the fund's factsheet:

    "UK stocks within the universe of the FTSE 350 Index, excluding investment trusts. Stocks are selected and weighted by one-year forecast dividend yield."

    This should circumvent the selection problem you describe.

    Hope this helps

    Bengt

  • 9. Tom Roundhouse

    (26 July 2012, 03:25PM)  Complain about this comment

    Hi Bengt,

    I take your point about the wording of the factcsheet but I do not resile from my opinion of the ETF. Since launch the Vanguard fund income units have pretty steadily outperformed the ETF by over 15% (Sharescope).

    Since launch the Vanguard fund has outperformed the FTSE 350 (ex investment trusts by 4%) The ETF has underperformed the same index by just less than 10% over the same period.

    Looking at the top ten holdings of each on can see that there is a real difference in methodology even though each fund is drawing from the FTSE 350 but so far as I can see there is only one winner and it ain't iShares.

    Most daming of all is the fact that since launch in 2005 the ETF is down 30% relative to the FTSE 350. Not a good recommendation whatever the yield.

    Time will tell which methodology wins out in the really long term but for the present my money is on Vanguard.

    Regards

    Tom

  • 10. jimtaylor

    (26 July 2012, 03:59PM)  Complain about this comment

    Bengt, thanks for an interesting article.

    I agree that a diversified portfolio is better in the long run, but diversification in itself is not enough.
    If assets are bought at the wrong price diversification can lead to mediocre results for a long time but, as your chart shows, if an asset looks pricey then it won't be long before it's price starts to drop as others move into whichever other asset looked like a bargain.

    So, there needs to be a bit of Contrarianism involved at the buying stages to get the best return from a diversified portfolio.

  • 11. sags12

    (26 July 2012, 05:05PM)  Complain about this comment

    Wide diversification is only required when investors do not understand what they are doing.
    Warren Buffett

  • 12. 4caster

    (26 July 2012, 09:32PM)  Complain about this comment

    Another asset class is omitted from the table: gold, or if you prefer, precious metals. True, they are "commodities", but a quite distinct asset class from those commodities that are not easily stored.

  • 13. StephenH2

    (27 July 2012, 03:04PM)  Complain about this comment

    We used to call this a Jelly Bean chart for obvious reasons!

  • 14. Mike T

    (31 July 2012, 02:47PM)  Complain about this comment

    Lets play a game. Invest 100 units each year in the 9th rank starting in 02. If 9th rank is deposit invest double in 9th rank ( + % gain)next year. Sell when in 4th rank or higher and reinvest in 9th rank. By my calculation this gives 1306 units to invest in 2011 after investing 1000 (neglecting divies and expenses) Not exactly inspiring, but not bad for very little work and far better than bank and building society. Incidentally in 09 commodities are given as -6% and if right should be ranked 9th. That would have given a total of 1281 units. I wonder if my wife would like an ISA this year instead of a cruise?

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


>