Are you worth more than £110,000?

By Bengt Saelensminde Aug 20, 2012

Bengt Saelensminde

Share with
friends:

Comments (22) Print this article

Here’s an interesting statistic for you. The average Briton today is worth some £110,000. That’s according to a report just released by the Office for National Statistics.

The report was titled the National Balance Sheet. And if you have a morbid fascination for this sort of stuff (as I do), it’s incredibly illuminating.

The figures can be interpreted in one of two ways. An optimist would say we’re rich. Despite the dire economy, net wealth grew by over 3% for the year ending 2011.

But the realists among you will be sceptical. And you have every right to be, in my opinion. Let’s take a look at the accounts...

Are we really this rich?

The following chart shows how the UK’s net wealth has seen fantastic growth since 1987. As you can see, the latest financial crisis was but a blip.

UK Total Net Worth 1987-2011

UK Total Net Worth 1987-2011

Source: Office for National Statistics

But what, exactly, is this wealth?

Well, it turns out it’s mostly housing. Of today’s near £7trn of wealth, housing accounts for about £4bn. Add in ‘other buildings and structures’ – which amount to over £1.5trn – and you’ll see that most of our wealth amounts to property.

As for real wealth, that is productive capacity, ‘plant and machinery’ comes in at well under £500bn.

Now, don’t get me wrong, I like property – both as an investment and a place to live. But we know that property values are cyclical. They are dependent on debt and interest rate cycles. And right now our national wealth is heavily dependent on the changing interest rate cycle.

That leaves financial wealth – all those stocks and bonds we own. Surely as a nation we must have an awful lot of these assets?

Well no. We can’t consider that real wealth either. Here’s why...

Financial wealth is an illusion

I’ve said this before, but I suspect many readers didn’t believe me – financial wealth is illusory.

Every investment you own is a promise to deliver something, sometime in the future. If you buy a corporate bond, that company has to make good on its promise to pay you back. If you buy a stock in that company, your claim is not as reliable.

Now these promises might be very valuable to you as an individual, but they even out when you are looking at the balance sheet of a nation. This is an important concept, so let me re-iterate in the words of the ONS:

“Financial assets comprise means of payment, financial claims, such as loans, and economic assets which are close to financial claims in nature, for example shares. Each financial asset has an equivalent liability, with the exception of monetary gold and special drawing rights.”

Looking at it from that point of view, financial assets are merely a tool for allocating the spoils of wealth. They are not real wealth.

The point I want to make is that if, as a nation, we hit hard times, then you should be prepared for some changes to how your financial assets work for you. The government may find they need to bend the rules on your promissory notes. And in a way, it’s already begun….


Special report

An exclusive report from The Right Side
"Bankrupt Britain?"


The massive gap in government finances

You don’t need me to tell you that the zero interest rate policy of the Bank of England is sapping your wealth. But believe me, matters could get a lot worse.

Take a look at this chart. It shows the government’s share of the nation’s balance sheet…

Central Government Net Worth 1987-2011

Central Government Net Worth 1987-2011

Source: Office for National Statistics

And what a shocking chart it is! The chart covers exactly the same period as the one I just showed you – you know the one that said we were getting richer and richer.

Successively selling off the family silver (and gold!) through privatisations and property sales has helped whittle away the real wealth of the nation. At the same time, the government has loaded up on debt through government bond issuance, setting the nation’s finances on a hopeless course. We tackled this issue recently... despite attempts to tackle the national debt, we’re going the wrong way!

That spells another few years of rock-bottom interest rates. We should also prepare for more money printing. And we can’t rule out financial repression. Who’s to say what measures the government might take to squeeze you, the private investor? I’m certainly wouldn’t be surprised to see a few stealth taxes introduced over the next year.

How to protect your wealth

It is not my intention to doom monger here. I just want to make sure you understand the risk you’re taking on with financial investments. It’s not just a banking bust that could take down these promises, it’s the government too.

A healthy dose of tangible investments in your portfolio would be wise, starting with gold. You know where I stand on gold. Gold is an asset without a promise attached. It is nobody’s liability. And that means it can’t be meddled with. I recommend that you hold 5% to 10% of your wealth in gold.

In the past I’ve also written about how to invest in physical silver too. In my opinion, some emerging-market assets should help your portfolio along over the coming decades too.

You also need to grow your wealth. Though it’s a risky bet, I mentioned one stock on Friday that I think could be very interesting, if you missed it, click here – I think you’ll like it.  

• This article is taken from the free investment email The Right side. Sign up to The Right Side here.

Important Information
Your capital is at risk when you invest in shares - you can lose some or all of your money, so never risk more than you can afford to lose. Always seek personal advice if you are unsure about the suitability of any investment. Past performance and forecasts are not reliable indicators of future results. Commissions, fees and other charges can reduce returns from investments. Profits from share dealing are a form of income and subject to taxation. Tax treatment depends on individual circumstances and may be subject to change in the future. Please note that there will be no follow up to recommendations in The Right Side.

Managing Editor: Frank Hemsley. The Right Side is an unregulated product published by Fleet Street Publications Ltd.

Fleet Street Publications Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. FSA No 115234. http://www.fsa.gov.uk/register/home.do

Comments (22)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Craig

    (20 August 2012, 05:52PM)  Complain about this comment

    When you say "I recommend that you hold 5% to 10% of your wealth in gold."

    Do you include gold stocks in the mix, or do you mean 5% to 10% of the physical stuff?

  • 2. Jim C

    (20 August 2012, 06:45PM)  Complain about this comment

    "Well, it turns out it’s mostly housing. Of today’s near £7trn of wealth, housing accounts for about £4bn."

    £4TRILLION, surely, Bengt?

    I think you should also mention *how* people should hold gold, as well... because if it's still in the financial system, the chances are pretty good it won't be there when you need it.

    Demand physical, allocated, in a private vault with a lien in your name, outside the banking system. Anything else is just a promise to deliver ounces of gold that almost certainly already have multiple claims against them.

    The bullion banks practice fractional reserve banking when it comes to gold, too... but with GBP, the BoE can always 'print' more to cover the banks.

    With physical gold? Not so much!

  • 3. 4caster

    (20 August 2012, 08:23PM)  Complain about this comment

    Yes, these are sobering thoughts.
    What is meant by "monetary gold"? Is it just bullion bars and coins such as sovereigns and krugerrands that have little or no rarity premium? (I've got my 10%.) What about authenticated 22 carat scrap gold rings, for example? And if gold, why not silver bullion or platinum nobles. Yes, they are subject in the UK to VAT, but so was gold for about 15 years.
    An investment in freehold land is also nobody's liability. It can't be created by fiat. It will still be there after buildings have crumbled and fine wine turned to vinegar. Land can be taxed, but so can everything else. Its value fluctuates over the decades, but not as much as gold.

  • 4. Jack

    (21 August 2012, 01:53AM)  Complain about this comment

    I notice the smart remark about "selling off the family silver". I also note that, from your chart, when the person who "[sold] off the family silver" left office, government wealth was at its peak.
    There is nothing wrong with selling the family silver to members of the family. Clearly neither Harold MacMillan (a Tory toff) nor the members of the Labour party (who have repeated that line ad nausiam) consider the population of the UK to be family members.

  • 5. Lik

    (21 August 2012, 08:58AM)  Complain about this comment

    Bengt - I think perhaps you've missed the most important point of this story.

    Yes, 'we' are worth £110k each on average. In reality, it would be interesting to compare this 'net worth' to actual number of people worth this; in other words, what is the distribution of this wealth? I would wager the top 1% of our population own more than 80% of this so-called wealth, rather than each of us owning around £110k.

    At first glance, it appears 'we' are getting rich at the expense of the state. In reality, a very small number of people are sucking the wealth from both us and the state. The 'rich are getting richer'....

    Your article is just another alarming pointer to this. This isn't conspiracy, it's pretty obvious to any who care to take an interest.

  • 6. r

    (21 August 2012, 10:54AM)  Complain about this comment

    @Craig, @JimC @4caster:

    I believe that the ETFS Physical Gold ETC (PHAU) allocates physical gold to investors. Storage and insurance are costs taken out by the management, so the listed value is what you get.

    r.

  • 7. JREwing

    (21 August 2012, 12:03PM)  Complain about this comment

    The government's capacity for self-delusion is without equal.

    Consider this: outside of London and the sub-urbs, much of the UK doesn't have much of an economy. Look for "Soviet Britain" on Google. London is totally dependent on finance - which has a questionable future. And then you add to this the debt to GDP (financial, corporate, household and sovereign) of 900 percent of GDP. And to that you add unfunded liabilities. So where does that leave the UK?

    I don't like UK property (including London property) because the UK is in long-term decline and property is overvalued for that reason. Today's property prices are a reflection of a 30 year credit bubble which is going to end badly. Real per capita GDP in the UK will not reach 2007 levels for a generation or more.

  • 8. Boris MacDonut

    (21 August 2012, 06:04PM)  Complain about this comment

    The ONS figures are a bit awry. There are also £1.2 trillion of savings and £500 billion of other assets such as antiques, furniture etc. The typical UK family is worth £330,000.
    The figure I find most bizarre is the £4 trillion of housing stock. There are 25.4 million houses worth on average £195k each, that is £5 trillion, or do we ignore council houses? If we do, then their value wipes out the Government asset deficit you describe.

  • 9. Colin Selig-Smith

    (22 August 2012, 10:23AM)  Complain about this comment

    Bengt,

    The net worth numbers are meaningless. Our monetary system is debt based, if deflation is simply allowed to continue indefinitely then 97% of the money would simply evaporate to the nothingness from whence it came and our wealth would apparently drop by 97%.

    You have to think of the wealth you have with respect to other wealth, bypassing the currency. Barrels of oil per square meter of housing kind of thing.

  • 10. dr ray

    (24 August 2012, 04:42PM)  Complain about this comment

    Bengt,
    Your belief in gold as being immune to financial repression is rather charming. Have you not read about Italians being stopped and having their gold confiscated at the Swiss border?Are you not aware that the govenment is currently putting legislation through that will make the sale of scrap metal for cash illegal. Who says it won't apply to PMs. Have you kept the receipts for all the gold coins you bought and if so are you prepared to have your gold subjected to a windfall tax or wealth tax on a regular basis. If a wealth tax or CGT is imposed on gold or gold ownership made illegal how do you rate your chances of getting it through airport security?

  • 11. Boris MacDonut

    (24 August 2012, 08:50PM)  Complain about this comment

    #10 drray. Gosh, how terrible. Dodgy Italians can no longer sequester their gold in Switzerland without veracity. I bet you find that a draconic and socialist imposition on free born rich blokes. Still, thanks for showing your true colours.

  • 12. Dr Ray

    (25 August 2012, 08:38AM)  Complain about this comment

    I understand your reasoning Boris: "If you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear"

    The most familiar phrase in repressive dictatorships throughout history. I'm not surprised you are in agreement.

  • 13. HenryVII

    (25 August 2012, 02:12PM)  Complain about this comment

    When ex Tory Prime Minister Harold Wilson stood up and criticised Margaret Thatcher's Government of selling the family's silver no one listen to him and thought he was placing a damp cloth over the Privatisation party. Several decades long it seems that he was right and what the UK Government should have been doing is create a sovereign wealth fund similar to the one now that exists in the state of Singapore.

  • 14. Boris MacDonut

    (25 August 2012, 06:15PM)  Complain about this comment

    #13 Henry. Cripes.
    #12 drray. I love the chagrin. I love the fact that you think it is repressive to stop criminals secreting cash in Switzerland. Do you realise where the word Swizz comes from?

  • 15. smlaing

    (25 August 2012, 11:32PM)  Complain about this comment

    Please don't think you actually own physical gold because you have an allocated account in a vault in Zurich with your name on it.....!

  • 16. Dr Ray

    (26 August 2012, 02:24PM)  Complain about this comment

    Boris @ #14 and #10

    Thanks for a classic example of the "straw man argument" You claim I said something I have clearly not said so you can have a go at me.
    Would you like to quote where I said anything about it being OK to let criminals get away with their gold.
    It is the treatment of honest citizens (like Bengt) as criminals I object to. You clearly don't value liberty as much as I do. (Or perhaps you just object to anyone other than yourself having liberty which seems to come across from your rants)

  • 17. Boris MacDonut

    (26 August 2012, 03:51PM)  Complain about this comment

    #16 drray. The very idea that honest Italians would be taking gold to Switzerland is as laughable as most of your comments.
    I'm just back from a couple of weeks in the Italian Lakes. Most hotels close to the Swiss border insist on being paid cash. These are, I assume, dishonest Italains moving Euros to Swizz- land. Good job they didn't ask me to pay in gold.I'd have to remove Doris's fillings.

  • 18. Dr Ray

    (26 August 2012, 09:20PM)  Complain about this comment

    Boris
    I was simply pointing out in my comment to Bengt regarding gold and financial repression that it is not inconceivable that governments suspend freedoms we take for granted in the so called civilised world and start seizing assets. It is usually portrayed as anti terrorist or anti money laundering legislation and once we accept that you can be stopped in the street or have your home entered and have to prove everything you own was acquired legitimately and all taxes paid on the money used for the purchase we will have gone a long way towards serfdom. The real drug dealers and terrorist have little trouble laundering money even with all the legislation heaped on people like you and me.

  • 19. dr ray

    (26 August 2012, 09:22PM)  Complain about this comment

    BTW Boris

    How do you reconcile supporting tax evasion and most probably also the Mafia on your holiday to Italy with your strongly held views to the contrary?

  • 20. Boris MacDonut

    (27 August 2012, 11:22AM)  Complain about this comment

    #19 drray. A dilemma definitely, but Doris and I only found out the cash only rule after having already stayed two nights. Rather than upset the mafiosi we raided our ATM's for Euros and grumbled a bit.
    #18 I do agree that in their desperation to obtian some monies Governments are likely to get more heavy handed, even if it upsets some of the rich (god forbid). Perhaps the largest amphibious landing since the Korean War will be a Nato invasion of the Caymans.

  • 21. Boris MacDonut

    (27 August 2012, 11:22AM)  Complain about this comment

    #19 drray. A dilemma definitely, but Doris and I only found out the cash only rule after having already stayed two nights. Rather than upset the mafiosi we raided our ATM's for Euros and grumbled a bit.
    #18 I do agree that in their desperation to obtian some monies Governments are likely to get more heavy handed, even if it upsets some of the rich (god forbid). Perhaps the largest amphibious landing since the Korean War will be a Nato invasion of the Caymans.

  • 22. Alan

    (29 August 2012, 12:35PM)  Complain about this comment

    I am sure a lot of trusting Americans in 1933 weren't tax dodgers either, but when the state gets vicious no-one is safe as they found when their gold was stolen at about $21 dollars and then immediately revalued to $35. That is a the kind of confiscation we are talking about.

    The Metropolitan Police in London recently proved the prevailing attitude of government with it's security box raid in London - we have the disgraceful scenarios of elderly people being forced to prove their family heirloom jewelry was in fact theirs, when of course they will not have receipts any more. We also know several pieces just "disappeared" while in police custody.

    Is it any wonder so many treasure hoards from Roman, Saxon, Mediaeval times get dug up? Ultimately, people realise the only option is to hide your wealth and hope some day you can come to pick it up again.

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


>