Why 20% of my equity portfolio is in emerging markets

By Bengt Saelensminde Feb 22, 2012

Bengt Saelensminde

Share with
friends:

Comments (9) Print this article

I’ve often made the case for investing in the emerging markets (EM) here in The Right Side. Alongside precious metals and bonds, I see EMs as an essential part of my long-term wealth-building game plan.

And it’s not necessarily for the reasons you might think. Today I’ll tell you my real motivation for putting a decent amount of my savings into emerging markets.

See, I think many investors dive into EMs for the wrong reasons. They just see near double-digit GDP growth figures for places like China or India and think those markets are a must-have for their portfolios.

And that’s understandable. I mean, an economy firing on all four cylinders must be great for stocks, right?

Well, not necessarily.

As my colleague Cris Sholto Heaton recently pointed out, data from the IMF and MSCI suggests the relationship between GDP growth and stock market performance is actually very weak – if it exists at all.

The fact is you can have an economy that is going like the clappers but that won’t necessarily deliver you stock market returns. Cris suggests that’s because investors end up shelling out too much for these growth stocks by paying bubble prices. And that’s a good point.

But I’ve got another idea. Today I want to show you why it’s not inconsistent for growing economies to deliver poor stock market returns.

More importantly I want to suggest why this doesn’t matter right now. There is in fact an even better reason why I think you need a foot in the emerging markets camp.

But first…

This is where so many EM investors go wrong

China is producing more and more millionaires every year. The number of individuals with investable assets of more than $1m is quickly catching up with the US. It makes sense. In a burgeoning economy, businesses are created every day – and that means more wealthy entrepreneurs.

In a healthy economy new firms provide competition. And healthy competition means profits are what economists like to call ‘normal’. When profits are normal, no single firm dominates, lapping up outsized profits.

That’s why it’s totally conceivable that company profits don’t ramp up just because an economy is firing on all cylinders. When competition is strong, there’s no reason why valuations should fly.

In fact you could argue the opposite is true. That is, in a mature economy like the UK or US, barriers to entry gradually grow. In the West, massive multinational firms predominate. The big boys snap up competitors and brush aside new entrants. Lack of competition can lead to ‘super-normal’ profits. And that could all be pretty bullish for the markets!

So far, so good. But hang on – because there’s an illness at the heart of most mature economies...


Special report

An exclusive report from The Right Side
"Bankrupt Britain?"


Why currency is key for EM investors

I’ve got a growing unease about the ‘health’ of the West.

Sure, mega-business can increase profits, but they do it by squeezing out opportunities for others. It’s not healthy for the economy as a whole...

And it’s not just mega-business that’s taking its toll on the economy. It’s the growing intervention of government too. Government red-tape means that small businesses struggle to get going.

I’m delighted to hear David Cameron’s ideas on cracking down on ‘The madness of European red tape’. But frankly, as a small business owner, I’m yet to see any evidence of it. (I’d be interested in knowing how other business-owning Right Siders feel on that – let me know by commenting at the end of this article…)

My point is that, together, Big Business and Big Government have a pernicious and stultifying effect on the economy. Just look at Europe – by gum, there’s an advert for reining in multi-national government!

Ultimately the effects of a weakened economy show up in foreign exchange rates. This is an ominous sign for the Western developed economies – we’ve seen it before in emerging markets currencies.

For decades bad macro-policies in the developing world have caused its currencies to be volatile and generally weak. Over time they’ve generally drifted against the strong currencies of the West.

But now what’s happened? The situation has reversed.

Here’s a chart produced by the London Business School and Credit Suisse. It shows EM currency volatility (relative to the $US) since 1972.

Major emerging market currencies versus the US dollar 1972-2011

The recent stability is striking. The yo-yoing spikes show how volatile EM currencies have been in the past. But recent years reveal a much calmer picture...

Stability: the long-term EM trend

EM currencies ain’t what they used to be. And neither are the currencies of the West!

Without a stable currency, businesses don’t like to invest in a country for the long term, and contracts are more difficult to pin down.

But it’s not just that. Over the last ten years or so, EM central banks have started to build tremendous foreign exchange reserves. At the same time, the West has built up what you might call negative reserves (debt – and lots of it!).

The point is, EM currencies are strengthening. I suspect that to be a theme for at least the next decade. EM will continue to do well as the West grapples with an inefficient corporate and government set up. And that’s not to mention the debt and demographic problems we have...

I’m aiming for a good 20% of my equity allocation to be invested in EMs. And remember, that’s not just because of better growth rates. This is because I want to hedge against sick old Western markets.

I’ve mentioned ways of playing EMs through two investment trusts in the past. You can read more about JP Morgan’s emerging market fund and the Ashmore Global Opportunities trust by clicking on the links.

And if you want to stay abreast of developments and investment ideas in EM, then sign up to MoneyWeek Asia. It’s a great read. And it’s free. Sign up here.

For me, emerging markets are a major opportunity and I’m always on the look for good ways to get exposure. If you have any good ideas to share, let me know. Or just let me know what you think about EMs – you can leave your comments below.

• This article is taken from the free investment email The Right side. Sign up to The Right Side here.

Important Information
Your capital is at risk when you invest in shares - you can lose some or all of your money, so never risk more than you can afford to lose. Always seek personal advice if you are unsure about the suitability of any investment. Past performance and forecasts are not reliable indicators of future results. Commissions, fees and other charges can reduce returns from investments. Profits from share dealing are a form of income and subject to taxation. Tax treatment depends on individual circumstances and may be subject to change in the future. Please note that there will be no follow up to recommendations in The Right Side.

Managing Editor: Frank Hemsley. The Right Side is a regulated product issued by Fleet Street Publications Ltd.

Fleet Street Publications Ltd is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. FSA No 115234. http://www.fsa.gov.uk/register/home.do

Comments (9)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. michael

    (22 February 2012, 05:18PM)  Complain about this comment

    the government talks the talk but has little impact on small business.
    over the past 4 years i've been involved with 2 totally different businesses, a web startup & a london hostel company.

    in the case of the web business we went to the banks to get a (small) loan, on the government scheme, they seemed more interested in gathering data so they could say they tried to lend, but when it came to lending money, even though we had customers and revenue they had no interest. we've since grown thankfully and now probably wont need any loan but it was a painful period

    in the hostel business the local councils pummelled us with red tape and ridiculously high council tax. with was 2009 and they said they'd review it in 2013, the rate was based on the previous business, which had a far higher turnover!!! we couldnt afford to hire more people because these clowns wouldnt fill out a few forms.

    councils in particular seem to loath businesses.

  • 2. Martin G

    (22 February 2012, 06:04PM)  Complain about this comment

    Bengt is quite right about barriers to entry thrown up by large corporate vested interests. I run a technology company and little of our revenue comes from the UK/EU. What surprised me was the financial support given to new technology ventures not just in the USA, but even in some "emerging markets". Government here says it does not want to "pick winners" but it needs to encourage large companies to use SMEs as a source of innovation without tying them up in knots. A better R&D tax credit system, and incentives for hiring and training, while dropping the disincentives for SMEs when they need to let go of underperforming staff would be helpful. Intellectual Property also needs big reform in the light of R&D costs and times to market

  • 3. Mick Durham

    (22 February 2012, 08:44PM)  Complain about this comment

    I disagree Bengt,the coalition has brought in a really helpful new way of looking at employment.Instead of the old Labour way of treating small businesses as if they had done something wrong by employing people and inflicting crippleing punishemnts on us for unfair dissmissal they have increased the time limit to two years before you can take your employer to a tribunal for U D plus they've tried to do something about the vexatious claims by bringing in a charge for taking your employer to tribunal and taking away legal aid to take your employer to court for UD.Good on David Cameron's Government I say!

  • 4. Arnold Gilpin

    (22 February 2012, 08:48PM)  Complain about this comment

    I am an architect and the construction industry is being strangled by red tape. After you have designed anything then the planning validation process kicks in checking the right shade of red is used on the Ordnance plan, then the access statement,the sustainability statement, the design statement, the historic asset assessment, the flood risk assessment, the phase 1 ecological assessment, the bat survey, the badger survey etc, the community infrastructure levy agreement. This is before you even get to the planner. And just in case you think it is unfair they have removed your right to appeal. It puts about £20,000.00 on the price of a starter home.

  • 5. Rob Dolman

    (23 February 2012, 10:13AM)  Complain about this comment

    I am a one man band in my late 50s. Decided I needed some help in my plumbing business.Chose the man I wanted. To add him to my fleet insurance £1383. To be added to my public liability insurance £383. To be added to employers liab ins £408. Register him with accredited body to enable him to work in domestic properties £432 assessment fee, £329 reg fee. HSE course and basic first aid training £333. Hygene certificate for COSHH £230. OFTEC registration to work with boilers £1430. CRB check because we work in schools £25
    All this before I have to pay him any wages. You can guess I didn't bother in the end!

  • 6. damian mcglynn

    (23 February 2012, 02:17PM)  Complain about this comment

    there are several ways to play EM's. I believe alternative investments in Latin America are growing and, with all the resources, this could be the best bet over the next decade. what do you think?

  • 7. huscot

    (24 February 2012, 04:32PM)  Complain about this comment

    I bought over 42k of LONR at 4p and sold at 12p, its presently at 10.5p and I've been tipped to buy. I've read the MoneyWeek article and looked at the charts. Can you help shorten my searching by directing me to more analyst remarks on West Africa.
    Thanks

  • 8. Steve

    (25 February 2012, 01:45PM)  Complain about this comment

    Bengt, thanks for including the info on the percentage of your portfolio that is allocated to EM.

  • 9. David Stuart

    (08 August 2012, 04:55PM)  Complain about this comment

    The comments from michael, Arnold Gilpin and Rob Dolman say it all, unfortunately. Why anyone bothers to start a business or employ anyone else in this country amazes me! We NEED a root and branch reform which we are most unlikely to get from the "2 posh boys" and all Nick Clegg can fret about is his wretched reforms to the House of Lords!

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


>