One of the most destructive forces in investing, and how you can escape it

By MoneyWeek Editor John Stepek Mar 14, 2013

John Stepek

Share with
friends:

Comments (10) Print this article

London Stock Exchange © Getty Images

Beware the temptation to trade too often

We all know that we should invest for the long term.

Making short-term punts, ducking in and out of stocks in reaction to headlines, and generally trading too much, is a recipe for losing money.

Yet it’s very tempting. If you’re remotely interested in the workings of the financial markets, then it’s very hard not to pay attention to their ups and downs. And when you see ‘hot’ stocks doing well, or exciting new trends taking off, you naturally want to get on board.

So you might be tempted to take the decision out of your own hands, and give all your money over to a fund manager to invest.

The trouble is, what few investors realise is that the ‘professionals’ are beset by exactly the same emotions. In fact, if anything, it’s even harder for them to resist the urge to invest for the short term.

Here’s why – and what it means for your money...

Fund managers’ incentives are all wrong

As Paul Woolley and Dimitri Vayanos point out in this morning’s FT, the ‘long-term’ versus ‘short-term’ investing debate is a bit of a hot topic among governments just now.

The most recent paper on the topic has come from the G30 (a think tank comprised of various economists and former central bankers and regulators). According to Woolley and Vayanos, they argue that regulators should draw up “best-practice guidelines” for long-term investors such as pension funds or sovereign wealth funds.

The idea is that this code would help all investors to understand just how damaging the current approach can be to their money.

So what sort of thing would be in it? Interestingly enough, it’s the sort of thing that we’ve been banging on about for a long time.

The distinction between short and long-term investing is not just about the length of time you hold an asset for. What really matters, say Woolley and Vayanos, is “the investor’s choice between the two basic investment strategies of momentum trading and fundamental investing.”

Momentum traders forget about trying to value stocks or any other asset. They just buy when prices are rising, and sell when they’re falling. The tools of the trade will usually involve charts and technical analysis.

Fundamental investors try to work out the ‘fair value’ of an asset, based on things like cash flow, and profitability, and balance sheet strength. They’ll look at the books and pore over ratios. If they find something that’s sufficiently cheap, they buy, sit back, and wait for the price to recover. 


Sign up for a 3-week FREE trial of MoneyWeek
and get the following free as well

"The only financial publication I could not be without."
John Lang, Director, Tower Hill Associates Ltd


Both approaches have their place. Dedicated momentum investors can do very well. And ‘fundamental’ investing has made the likes of Warren Buffett a lot of money over the years.

The trouble is, lots of fund managers who purport to be using fundamentals, are really just chasing performance. And this largely comes down to the way the finance industry is structured.

Fund managers are measured on short-term performance. If the FTSE 100 goes up by 10% over three months, and a UK equity manager’s fund goes up by ‘just’ 5%, you can bet he’s going to get some angry phone calls. If the FTSE 100 slides by 20% over three months, and the manager loses ‘just’ 10%, nobody will complain.

So why would you bother searching for value? Your best bet for a quiet life and some relatively easy money is to hug your benchmark as tightly as possible. If that involves over-trading and racking up lots of costs, so be it. As long as your performance is merely mediocre, and not downright catastrophic, your job will be safe.

It’s called ‘career risk’. We’ve discussed it many times in the past. It’s probably one of the most destructive forces in the market.

The solution to career risk

Woolley and Vayanos come up with some good ideas for what should be in a ‘long-term investing code’. For example, they suggest capping fund turnover at 30% a year, and scrapping performance fees based on short-term results.

Persuading investors to look at other measures of success when choosing funds, could help to push a change of attitude in the business. Particularly now that the consumer focus is falling so heavily on costs.

But you don’t have to wait for this to happen. As an individual investor, you don’t have to worry about justifying your performance to anyone else. So all the distortions caused by ‘career risk’ vanish when you take your investments into your own hands.

You don’t have to worry about beating, or matching a specific benchmark. All you need to do is to keep your nerve. That’s easier said than done. But right now, my colleague Phil Oakley is working on a newsletter that looks at how to build a simple, core portfolio that should help you to grow your money through thick and thin in the long run. It’s still in development but I’ll keep you up to date on it as we go along.

How to profit from short-term trading

This said, I wouldn’t dismiss momentum investing out of hand. Momentum or trend-following can be a very successful strategy. But you need to know what you’re doing.

You can of course try out spread betting (sign up for our free MoneyWeek Trader email if you’re interested). But it’s always worth remembering that most spread betters lose in the long run. It’s not a route to easy riches.

So this is one area at least where I’d suggest it’s a good idea for most investors to delegate the job to an expert. If you’re interested in profiting from momentum, regular MoneyWeek contributor Tim Price has tipped a trend-following fund, the BlueCrest BlueTrend (LSE: BBTS) fund a few times in the past.

It’s fair to say that the share price has done very little over the past year or so. But so far this year, it’s looking as though markets may start to trend more strongly. We’ve seen big, dramatic moves in everything from stocks to currencies.

So the environment for trend followers may be improving. It was one of Tim’s tips for 2013 in our New Year Roundtable. If you’re not already a subscriber, get your first three issues free here.

• This article is taken from the free investment email Money Morning. Sign up to Money Morning here .

Follow John on Twitter || Google+ John Stepek

Our recommended articles for today

Being right isn’t good enough

You might be right about the markets. But if you get your timing wrong, it can cost you dearly, says Bengt Saelensminde. Here, he reveals a far better way to invest.

Brussels versus the bankers

SUBSCRIBERS ONLY
The EU is passing laws that will put a cap on bankers’ bonuses. But will the law have the desired effect? And will it hurt Britain’s economy? Matthew Partridge reports.

Comments (10)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Orange

    (14 March 2013, 01:03PM)  Complain about this comment

    Are you saying that fund managers chase short term performance through momentum investing or value investing or a combination of both?

  • 2. Patrick

    (14 March 2013, 02:06PM)  Complain about this comment

    ..."For example, they suggest capping fund turnover at 30%"...what happens if the fund manager forecasts that a large proportion (>30%) of the assets in the fund are going down the pan. Why would I want a restriction which prevented my fund manager moving into more attractive investments? If you dont think the fund manager can justify the fee then get out and just buy a tracker.

  • 3. SteveH

    (14 March 2013, 02:18PM)  Complain about this comment

    Do you have any evidence that people who invest their own money do better than
    1 funds or just the FTSE?
    2 savings accounts?

    I asked TD Waterhouse, H-L etc, and apparently they don't

  • 4. TonyB

    (14 March 2013, 03:02PM)  Complain about this comment

    I use a program supplied by Updata and practice short term investing using Point and Figure diagrams as described in "the Definitive Guide to Point and Figure" by Jeremy du Plessis. His technique allows you to throw up Targets with Reward to Risk ratios dependent on the price momentum. The Updata program also allows you to carry out automatic searches for shares meeting the criteria you want.ie "price riseing A Reward to risk over 3 times and a target price say 20% above todays price.
    Having set up the system you only need monitor your portfolio for 30 minutes a day to buy and sell.

  • 5. Impromptu

    (14 March 2013, 05:12PM)  Complain about this comment

    Surely a lot of people use funds because they wish to relinquish responsibility for their investments. This comes at a price - perhaps 2% per annum, and I've never really seen the reason why running £300,000 is any more work than running £30,000. Is getting the computer to add an extra zero on every transaction really worth, in this case, £5,400 a year? That's some expensive zeros... If anything, the relative trading costs should actually be cheaper.
    Managing your own wealth requires a certain temperament, but if you find you have the necesary stuff, you are effectively paying yourself the management fees. You may not shoot out the lights, but then neither do most fund managers.
    I would also say that LTBH nuts'n'bolts income investors should ignore benchmarks altogether and just focus on trouncing savings rates with an eye to managing capital risk. If you can achieve that, capital growth tends to happen as a side-effect.

  • 6. Lupulco

    (14 March 2013, 09:57PM)  Complain about this comment

    It all depends on your targets and aims.
    Providing you don't borrow to invest, or use all your savings. You can turn investing into a interesting hobby.
    I aim to keep ahead of mediocre % rates on offer for savers.
    I aim to keep ahead of RPI
    If i am lucky, the more i learn, the luckier i become i can even keep up, or better what the experts can offer. At least i have done in 3 out of the 4 past years.
    Then again, its a hobby, i am retired and have no one on my back to force me to achieve daily/weekly targets. So i can go at my own pace.
    Plus the Stock Market is still the biggest online game there is and the money i play with if i lost 100% of my original stake, unlikely, as i only started with my car fund and i am up 50% plus on this instead of losing 30% in the first year of buying a new car. Also i never spend more then 5% on any one share.

  • 7. NVP

    (15 March 2013, 08:29AM)  Complain about this comment


    fund managers ?.......are you kidding ?

    like everything is life you must take responsibility for your own destiny .......giving your money to a fund manager is like hiring a blind chauffeur ......both end in disaster and misery

    NVP

  • 8. Clive

    (15 March 2013, 06:15PM)  Complain about this comment

    I suspect that those who invest directly in shares are kidding themselves about how successful such people are as a class.

    Sure, there are people who do well, maybe very well, but reading threads like this gives a distorted view of such individuals as only the "winners" post threads.

    You'll see a lot of "I researched this company, liked the fundamentals, bought in at 20p and it's now 350p" type of stuff. I've never seen comments long the lines of "I researched this company, got the accounts, studied the market, blah, blah,blah, bought in at 20p and it dropped like a stone".

    Different with fund managers, where both the winners and the losers have to post their results.

  • 9. Impromptu

    (17 March 2013, 08:53PM)  Complain about this comment

    Clive:

    Agreed about the reporting bias problem.

    However, putting together an income-based portfolio by hand generally arrives at a position very similar to the top holdings of 90% of income-based funds. If you take the latter route you get protection from yourself and ongoing stewardship.

    Assuming you have the temperament for self-management you can steward your own flock, particularly since this type of asset is so widely scrutinised and reported. It's up to you if you think relinquishing responsiblity is worth maybe 2% of your total invested wealth per annum. Which can be viewed as accepting a personal inflation rate of 75%-odd over the odds.

  • 10. leightyip

    (10 April 2013, 03:17PM)  Complain about this comment

    short term invest - Deposited $5000 Return $100,000 in 12 hours. http://goo.gl/HUKNs

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


>