Prepare yourself for when Britain’s safe haven appeal wears off

By MoneyWeek Editor John Stepek Jan 30, 2012

John Stepek

Share with
friends:

Comments (14) Print this article

It may seem a bit mad to those of us living here, but Britain has a lot of appeal as a safe haven.

We have a political and legal system with one of the best track records in the world in terms of longevity and stability. And despite our never-ending breast beating about decline, we are still one of the world’s biggest economies. As for sterling – it might not be the global reserve currency any more, but it’s unlikely to cease to exist in the near future.

So if you’re a wealthy foreigner living in a risky part of the world, and you want to put your money somewhere safer, then Britain is very appealing. Your money is unlikely to get trapped there by capital controls. You don’t have to bribe anyone. And anything you buy – from property to equities to bonds – is protected by a proven, functional legal system.

The big question is: what happens when everyone stops looking for a safe haven?

The secret to Britain’s success stories – foreign money

The fuel behind the brightest spots in the British economy in recent years can be summed up in two words: foreign money.

Take house prices. If you live outside London, you could be forgiven for imagining that the entire capital is shielded by some sort of crash-proof moat.

The way the papers sometimes paint it, London is a dynamic global playground that services the world’s wealthy elite, and thoughtfully allows some of those earnings to trickle down to the parasitic appendage that is the rest of the UK.

There’s a grain of truth to all this. But only a grain. In fact, it’s a very small portion of London that’s benefited from the flood of foreign money. According to property research group Hometrack, house prices are lower than they were in 2007 in more than half of London postcodes.

Average prices are down 20% across 193 of the capital’s 243 postcodes, says the FT. A further ten are flat on 2007 – in other words, they’re back at peak prices. The remaining 40 – capped by super-wealthy bits like Knightsbridge and Belgravia – have risen beyond the 2007 peak.

The parts of London that have risen have either been fuelled directly by demand from foreign buyers, or by knock-on demand from wealthy British people who have been pushed out of their traditional haunts by even wealthier overseas buyers.

Anything fuelled primarily by demand from domestic money has fallen in price, just as is the case in the rest of the country.

British buyers are being ground down

This shouldn’t come as any surprise. If you live in Britain and earn your wages here, then chances are your standard of living has been squeezed hard in the last few years.

Price inflation has been above wage inflation since the 2008 slump. At first, the impact of the crash was offset by the plunge in interest rates (not to mention the plunge in oil prices). If you kept hold of your job, and you had a variable-rate home loan, chances are you felt a lot richer.

But since 2009, those gains have been gradually rolled back. Your wages have failed to keep up with the cost of living. And Bank of England money printing has hammered sterling, ensuring in the process that any benefit from falling commodity prices was very short-lived.

So it’s little wonder that what demand exists in the economy is primarily being driven by overseas money.

The danger is that this money dries up – or finds somewhere better to go.


Sign up for a 3-week FREE trial of MoneyWeek
and get the following free as well

"The only financial publication I could not be without."
John Lang, Director, Tower Hill Associates Ltd


It’s not as far-fetched as it might sound. The luxury sector has been one of the few success stories on the high street. But with China certainly slowing down (even if the financial industry refuses to acknowledge it), demand in that area is very likely to falter.

And on the other hand, if Europeans become even a little more confident that the euro will survive, those safe haven flows could dry up too. After all, the eurozone crisis has been obvious for a long time. If I wanted to get my money out of there, I’d have moved most of it by now. Alternatively, capital controls in the region will make it harder for money to get out. Either way, there’s only so much fleeing capital to go around.

Avoid gilts and be wary of sterling

I’ve already suggested that I’d avoid the luxury goods sector. I also think you should avoid gilts. We’ve been saying this for a while (with the honourable exception of James Ferguson), and it’s fair to point out that they’ve done very well in recent years. But I don’t see the point in investing in an over-priced asset on the basis that it might become even more over-priced.

Yes, the major counterpoint to anyone suggesting that government debt is in a bubble, is to point to Japan. Betting against Japanese government bonds (JGBs) has been a losing battle for years.

However, there are some key differences between Japan and the UK (or the US, for that matter). There’s the obvious one – the fact that the vast majority of JGBs are owned by domestic investors, who tend to be less fickle in their appetites.

But there’s also the fact that Japan doesn’t suffer from inflation. It suffers from deflation. So Japan’s government bonds actually offer investors a real return, even at very low nominal yields.

You can’t say that for gilts. Indeed, at current levels, it’s costing you around 2.5% in real terms to lend the British government money over ten years. Even if inflation falls as far as Mervyn King hopes it will this year, you’ll still not be getting paid anything to lend to Britain’s politicians.

So I wouldn’t touch gilts with a ten-foot bargepole. I wouldn’t short them either: the Bank of England can keep yields propped up by printing money and it probably will. But this could have another nasty knock-on effect: a weaker pound.

Sterling had a pretty good year last year, mainly because it didn’t look that bad a bet compared to most other currencies. But I suspect that against a backdrop of weak growth combined with rampant quantitative easing, that could change this year. We like gold anyway – but if you’re a British investor, you should make doubly sure you have some in your portfolio to protect against a weaker currency.

• This article is taken from the free investment email Money Morning. Sign up to Money Morning here .

Our recommended article for today

Profit from the biggest ‘non-event’ of all time

A US interest-rate freeze was all stocks needed to take off. But one interesting market's been overlooked, says Bengt Saelensminde - and there's still time for you to buy.

Comments (14)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. geoff

    (30 January 2012, 11:49AM)  Complain about this comment

    I'd blame Cameron and Osbourne for the lack of growth. The current recession has lasted longer than the 'Great Depression'. Nice link by Krugman,
    http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/01/28/the-worse-than-club/

  • 2. twitter.com/dharmaone

    (30 January 2012, 12:34PM)  Complain about this comment

    On UK gilts/JGB - I've been thinking about how to play this. I agree the central banks can keep printing and buying bonds to keep the rates down, but surely there's a limit to how much of that can be done before inflation starts hurting. In Japan's case the limit is probably further in the future than in UK's case. I guess you could hedge against QE by shorting both UK gilts and sterling. Would be interesting to hear readers opinions, and also ideas on what instruments to use.

    I certainly hope someone will keep buying UK gilts and we keep our triple A rating - if the rates start going up, our debt burden would quickly start to look unsustainable and result in a downward spiral of disappearance of foreign investors, rising yield rates, more QE and weakening purchasing power of UK citizens - not a comfortable thought.

  • 3. Phil

    (30 January 2012, 12:58PM)  Complain about this comment

    No. 1 Geoff. - So you blame a government thats been in about 18months and lets face it didn't have much left to work with. Personally I blame Nu Labour for 13 years of irresponsible spending. With govenments like that you don't need foriegn enemies. Brown should be up on charges of treason !!

  • 4. Mike

    (30 January 2012, 02:30PM)  Complain about this comment

    No.3 - Phil, I couldn't agree more. My blood boils with rage when I listen to Milliband and Balls trying to to blame the current government for the mess their party has put us in. Brown as former chancellor and PM should as you say be answerable to the country on charges of treason.

  • 5. Boris Macdonut

    (30 January 2012, 02:49PM)  Complain about this comment

    New Labour have a lot to answer for. We always knew Blair was two faced, but Brown betrayed the poor and should be rightly contrite.
    #Phil the coalition has been in since 9th May 2010 (21 months). On the basis the average duration of a UK Governemnt in the past 50 years is just 47 months they are near the half way mark with little to show for it but an extra £300 billion of debt, the rich getting ever richer and the poor having pay freezes, benefit cuts and falling asset values. They are too timid and it is inevitable they will fail.

  • 6. Segedunum

    (30 January 2012, 03:13PM)  Complain about this comment

    You can't grow your way out of a recession with the debts that we have on our backs. The 'austerity' measures of this government are a joke because it's clear that no real cuts have been made as the debts pile up. Labour is also laughable for suggesting the government has cut too far and too fast.

  • 7. Lupulco

    (30 January 2012, 03:35PM)  Complain about this comment

    I blame ALL the Governments. They, have not balanced their books for years, The UK has only done this for 5 out of the last 45 years.
    What is happening now is the true WMD is beginning to hurt, compound %. Plus, the Bank bail out and cheap money allowing Hedge Funds to speculate using other peoples money.
    Even this current Government are only talking about balancing the books within 4 years. If % rate have to rise we will really be in the do-do
    What is required is a spending freeze by the Government. Pensions, Benefits etc frozen, yes allow the basic tax allowance to rise up to £10k over the life of this Parliament. Let the people spend it.
    Increase taxes by, Scrapping Community Charges and introduce a Property tax of 1% on ALL property. Drop the 50p tax rate to 40p, but abolish the ceiling for NI contributions.
    Have a Pay & Expense freeze on our MP's, Whitehall Mandarins until the National debt is below 50% of GDP, including PFI Initiatives. This is only off balance sheet debt.

  • 8. geoff

    (30 January 2012, 04:06PM)  Complain about this comment

    Hey dont assume I support labour. I do believe that the debt labour left was no where near as bad as the Tory propogranda suggests.

    Here's another non-plug from Krugman's blog - the graph is interesting.You can see the UK's debt after WW2 was in a different league to 2008. Infact what Brown did leave (in terms of debt/GSP) was as almost as good as the UK has ever had.

    http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/12/31/a-thought-on-debt-history/

    I would suggest the govt's Keynsian - Vince Cable, would be adopting what Krugman suggests.

  • 9. Boris MacDonut

    (30 January 2012, 04:45PM)  Complain about this comment

    #8 Geoff is right of course. The New Labour debt was much lower than Churchill's war debt. It is a Tory urban myth that these are the worst debts we've ever endured.
    #7 Lupulco. My goodness me. What a lot of nonsense. You actually see the sloution to our dilemma to be taking from the poor and giving to the already very, very rich.

  • 10. Steve

    (30 January 2012, 05:56PM)  Complain about this comment

    John,

    I hear the message about UK gilts. But what about UK index linked gilts? Would you also not touch those with a barge pole? Is there no case to be made for holding some of these in a portfolio alongside gold and defensives given the volatility of everything else?

  • 11. Jeff

    (30 January 2012, 08:38PM)  Complain about this comment

    The FACTS are:

    1 Gordon Brown was borrowing 3% a year at the TOP of the bubble. To borrow above the long term sustainable rate at the peak of the economic cycle is just not sustainable.
    2 When it turned bad, Gordon left us borrowing about 11% a year.

    That's severely irresponsible.


  • 12. jones the spy

    (30 January 2012, 09:37PM)  Complain about this comment

    what is your opinion on Index Linked Gilts, are they the same as all Gilts?

  • 13. geoff

    (30 January 2012, 10:50PM)  Complain about this comment

    Again, I'm not defending Labour. However the increase in borrowing was largely due to the collapse in tax.

    Keynesian economics would propose to increase spending (and increasing debt). However it wouldn't be on handouts and the welfare. China gave a huge injection into its economy, and it appears the German government is doing the same (while preaching austerity to the rest of Europe).

  • 14. Segedunum

    (30 January 2012, 11:52PM)  Complain about this comment

    What people misunderstand is that it is not so much the scale of the debt, especially when compared to GDP (an often distorted statistic), but the money printing that is going on and the fact that our currency is not linked to anything intrinsic to stop it spiralling out of control and becoming worthless.

    Not to mention how large the principal plus the interest actually is on our debt and all the off-balance-sheet stuff like PFI....................

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


>