Three vital things you must know about commodities

By MoneyWeek Editor John Stepek Oct 05, 2012

John Stepek

Share with
friends:

Comments (11) Print this article

Buy ‘real’ assets.

This is an argument you’ll often hear these days. With governments around the world printing money, there will be a lot more paper money than ‘stuff’ in the world. So the ‘stuff’ will only become more valuable.

For investors, one very important category of ‘real stuff’ is commodities. 

The big, big commodity that’s often in the news is oil.  Without it, the global economy would come grinding to a halt.  So fluctuations in the supply or the price have huge consequences.  But there are many other commodities too.

There are agricultural, or ‘soft’ commodities – foodstuffs such as grain, or material such as cotton. There are industrial, or ‘base’ metals, such as copper. There are energy resources, such as oil and natural gas.

And then there are precious metals, such as gold, silver, platinum and rhodium.  (NB: As I said last time, I don’t see gold as a commodity, I see it as a currency. I’m not going to talk about gold and silver here).

The dangers of buying commodities

So how do commodities fit into your portfolio?

Up until the turn of the century, most commodity prices had been falling for years. It wasn’t really seen as an investable asset class. Nobody was interested in ‘stuff’ – they were more interested in ‘virtual’ assets, like tech stocks.

But with the rise of emerging markets, and China in particular, came the ‘commodity supercycle’. As more people moved to cities, developing countries built lots of houses, roads, railways, office blocks – and as a result, demand for commodities soared.

As a result, they’ve gradually come to be seen as an investment asset all on their own. Exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have been launched to track commodity prices directly, for example.

However, I don’t think you should consider commodities as a separate asset class at all. Here’s why.

There are two key problems with investing directly in commodities. Firstly, it’s not that easy to do. You can spread bet, but that’s highly risky, and certainly not for beginners.

Alternatively, you can buy an ETF. But some of these use futures, which means – to cut a long story short – that they don’t follow the price in the way that you might expect them to. Physically-backed ETFs track the ‘spot’ price more closely.


Sign up for a 3-week FREE trial of MoneyWeek
and get the following free as well

"The only financial publication I could not be without."
John Lang, Director, Tower Hill Associates Ltd


But that brings us to the second, more significant problem, which is this: investing directly in commodities is pure speculation. You are betting on a price either rising or falling. Commodities themselves produce no income. So it’s not a long-term investment. It’s a punt.

And over the long run, commodities have generally tended to fall in price. That’s because as prices get higher, there’s more incentive to invest in technology that either creates cheaper substitutes, or enables us to produce more of the commodity that’s in demand.

Natural gas is a classic example. New ‘fracking’ technology has enabled companies in the US to access once irretrievable reserves of gas. The resulting supply glut has sent the price of natural gas plunging in the US, and encouraged power stations to switch to using gas rather than coal.

In short, a direct investment in commodities is a trade, not a ‘buy and hold’ position. So my view is that you shouldn’t allocate a specific place to commodities in your long-term portfolio.

If you want to profit from a bull market in commodities, you should buy shares in the companies that produce the commodities in question. If you think that copper will become more expensive, buy a copper miner, or a mining fund.

If you think that food prices will rise, buy companies that will help us to grow more food – such as fertiliser producers, or companies involved in genetically modified crops.

But these would all count as part of the ‘equities’ section of your overall portfolio. You are buying these companies because you believe they will profit from the underlying rise in commodity prices.

What to buy if you are worried about currency debasement


If you are instead looking for exposure to ‘real’ assets to protect yourself against currency devaluation and money printing, then the answer to that is simple. Buy gold.

Why do I say this? Well, copper, for example, has lots of uses. Copper demand is largely based on the fact that it’s used for generating power, or producing car components, or in air conditioning units.

So people aren’t buying copper because they are worried about paper money losing its value. They are buying copper because they need it to wire up their homes. If the Chinese decide to build fewer houses – which is what’s happening now – then that’s going to be a drag on copper prices, regardless of how much money is printed.

Gold on the other hand, has negligible industrial use. So it’s only real function is as a store of wealth. And that’s why it is the asset you need to hold if you are worried about currency debasement.

In short, if you believe there’s a bull market in a given commodity, then you should allocate some of the equity portion of your portfolio to companies that will benefit from this. Just as you would buy retailers if you thought a country was heading for a consumer boom.

But if it’s ‘real’ assets you are looking for, I’d suggest sticking with gold.

• This article is taken from our beginners' guide to investing, MoneyWeek Basics. Everything you need to know about how to invest your money for profit, delivered FREE to your inbox, twice a week. Sign up to MoneyWeek Basics here .

Comments (11)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. stuart

    (05 October 2012, 07:39PM)  Complain about this comment

    Do you consider Silver in the same way as gold? Is there likely to be a shortage of silver or with China needing less commodities will silver production keep up?

  • 2. Bapodra Investments

    (05 October 2012, 08:25PM)  Complain about this comment

    John, you have forgotton one important example. This is as the price of gold as been going up the gold miners have been going down.

  • 3. DrD

    (08 October 2012, 11:19AM)  Complain about this comment

    "If you think that food prices will rise, buy companies that will help us to grow more food – such as fertiliser producers, or companies involved in genetically modified crops."

    What the about food retailers (supermarkets). Surely if the price of food goes up so would their profits?

  • 4. PM

    (08 October 2012, 12:08PM)  Complain about this comment

    Hi John.

    An interesting start ot the article given that you declared the commodity bull market as over fairly recently.

    Moreover, studies show that investing in the actually commodity itself is less risky than investing in commodity based shares - so the basic premise of your article is wrong.

    If you invest in an ETF tracker of underlying commodity futures then the contango and backwardation should to some degree balance itself out across the 'basket' over a period of time. Although you are right it won't 'track' exactly.

    You mention that in investing in the underlying commodity the investor is taking on a pure punt because they offer no yield. However, a number of major commodity based shares offer only a negligable yield and you take on the added risk of owning the share itself! Would you consider BG Group a punt (only a 1% yield) ???

    of course commodities are a seperate asset class!?

    best wishes,

    Paul

  • 5. dave

    (08 October 2012, 12:14PM)  Complain about this comment

    @ DrD - recently food prices have gone up and that has hurt the cheaper end of the supermarkets like tesco and especially Morrisons- they have had to keep their prices consistent to continue to appeal to their customer base but they didn't have as much spare profit margin as sainsbury or waitrose, who have kept their prices consistent too, but maintained a profit. so I don't buy the idea that rising food prices are necessarily good for supermarkets when the price rise is driven by the supply side.
    I have bought agriterra and Syngenta as agriculture plays- they have 'real assets' in the sense that AGTA is a primary food and energy producer, and Syngenta has technology and plant.

  • 6. dave

    (08 October 2012, 12:18PM)  Complain about this comment

    @PM- "studies show"- references please!
    when you say less risky- is that risk or volatility?
    a commodity stock might have a greater 'beta' than the commodity it produces, but is it riskier? I am not disagreeing with you, because I have no idea; I am just asking.

  • 7. RobertO

    (08 October 2012, 12:42PM)  Complain about this comment

    DrD, I see that many people including yourself state that increased food prices would increase supermarket profits. I do not understand as to why an increase in the prices of a supermarkets supplies of any type would increase profits. I would have thought it could have the opposite effect especially if the supermarket had to reduce margins so as to remain competitive as its stock increased in price. So as per normal I am confused - any explanations gratefully received.

  • 8. les

    (08 October 2012, 02:28PM)  Complain about this comment

    For those of us who do not yet know how and where to buy physical gold - and from whom, perhaps you would produce an article giving the sort of information that will help with such purchase.
    I have found that, in looking to buy physical gold, I am expected to pay a premium over the spot price and so one has then to wait for the spot price to catch up before seeing any benefit on the purchase (on paper, that is).
    The next, and more important point is: where does one sell the gold when one needs to return to cash ? It appears that the selling will incur a discount to the spot price also; so holding gold is not all that it is made out to be.
    The movement in gold would have to be great indeed to produce a profit after the costs of premium on buying and discount on selling.
    Please Mr Stepek may we have your detailed comments on these points.

  • 9. AllyPally

    (16 December 2012, 05:06PM)  Complain about this comment

    I am somewhat confused by the lesson on commodities. You began by saying that you regard gold as a currency and not a commodity and would therefore not be discusssing it. The article then goes on to deal with gold as a hedgw against inflation. I agree with the article but am questioning the logic of the presentation.

  • 10. Geoff T

    (29 March 2013, 12:27PM)  Complain about this comment

    John - very interesting, what is the best way to invest in gold - not straightforward -what are the best options??

  • 11. cresswell

    (07 April 2013, 01:47PM)  Complain about this comment

    My puzzlement is that for as long as I have been taking Money Week Mag. the suggested allocation for gold has been about 10% of my portfolio. Laterly the warnings about rapidly dropping currency values have increased to a daily basis, but the allocation for gold remains at 10%. ???

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


>