Home—Blog—If you make corruption transparent, will it go away? Maybe
Jan 10, 2012, 03:03
Posted byMerryn Somerset Webb
Comments (4)
Ask people what upsets them most about the divide between the rich and the poor and you usually find it is not so much the inequality itself, but where that inequality came from.
Few people mind clever entrepreneurs being super rich and, oddly, inherited wealth – as long as it is considered to have been honestly come by and it has an inheritance or wealth tax attached to it – doesn’t much bother people either.
What does bother them is high levels of undeserved corporate pay; rewards for failure; and most of all, fortunes won via corruption of one kind or another. They also loathe cheating officials who get rich on the back of bribes and abuse of their positions.
Authorities all over the place know this: that’s why our papers are full of politicians promising actions of one kind or another against the world’s tax dodgers and benefit cheats and why in developed economies, governments make sure bureaucratic bribes don’t really exist.
It is also why the Chinese authorities make such a big deal out of clamping down on corrupt bureaucrats: they know that social unrest is rarely more than a particularly greedy official away. But what happens when the state just isn’t up to the job? China regularly vows to stamp out corruption. But it has 50 million-odd state employees, and the frequency with which they end up being convicted of all manner of shenanigans suggests that bribery and the like remain as common as ever.
It is the same in India, where bribery is entirely routine: everyone accepts that if they want to register their house, get a driving licence, get their electricity connected, get admitted to hospital or even report a crime to the police, they will need to pay at least one person along the way – and probably several.
Sign up for a 3-week FREE trial of MoneyWeek and get the following free as well
"The only financial publication I could not be without." John Lang, Director, Tower Hill Associates Ltd
The upshot? In 2010, India ranked 87/178 and China 78/178 in Transparency International’s survey of perceived corruption.
It could be worse of course. But both countries are far too poorly placed on the list to be able to claim the stable property rights, legal process and clean governance necessary for a full transition from developing economy to developed. Bad governance doesn’t just irritate people. It kills economic potential too. So what can make this change? Could it be the victims themselves? A newish website (2010) has been set up in India to help them have a go – Ipaidabribe.com.
Go to it and you can enter the details of bribes you have been obliged to pay – who, where, why and how much. That not only establishes “the market price of corruption” as the website puts it, but it brings the whole thing out into the open, providing a forum for people to exchange information about both paying bribes and how to avoid paying bribes.
It also brings risk to bribe takers for the first time: its founders (Swati and Ramesh Ramanathan) hope that the experiences already reported on the site will show patterns of corruption in particular departments and start to shame government departments into cleaning up their acts. Will it work? It is probably too early to say. But it is off to a good start. So far, over 15,000 bribes have been reported and you, hopefully along with a few government officials, can have a look at a breakdown of them to see where anti-corruption action is most urgently needed (the Bangalore Police Department it seems).
The idea has also spread to China where several anti-bribery websites sprung up last summer. However, things aren’t going so well there: the Chinese authorities say they are anti-corruption but it appears they are also against the population doing anything about it: all of those sites appear to have been shut down within a matter of weeks of launching.
I’m not crazy about either of them right now, but if I was forced to bet on either China or India as a long-term economic winner, this is yet another reason why I think I would choose India.
Published in Blog More articles by Merryn Somerset Webb
By Lars Henriksson, May 21, 2012
By Lars Henriksson, May 03, 2012
By Merryn Somerset Webb, Apr 30, 2012
Apr 26, 2012
Leave a comment
(11 January 2012, 10:59AM) Complain about this comment
Trust is the crucial ingredient Merryn.The UK like many nations has suffered a major breakdown in trust at all levels, including where the rich got their riches.It makes people unhappy ,cynical and destroys social harmony.No surprise to see Russia near the bottom, but our leaders have courted Russia's wealthy for the past decade or more. I am surpirsed to see two EU countries (Romania and Bulgaria) so low down and equally to see Nigeria and Pakistan relatively well up the list. But most shocking is Luxembourg and Hong Kong, top secrecy jurisdictions, in the top ten!
(11 January 2012, 11:15AM) Complain about this comment
Interesting idea from the Indians. I had a quick look at the website. The question that immediately struck me was whether Indian officials wear name badges. It would up the ante considerably if anyone writing in to the website were to name the offical who asked for/received the bribe - although in the apparently numerous cases of police officers letting people off from a traffic-related fine in exchange for a bribe, it might create problems for the person reporting it too.
(11 January 2012, 01:19PM) Complain about this comment
Its surely just a matter of scale and subtlety. While in India the average Joe can bribe the policeman on the street with a couple of quid, in the UK you need to put the Chief Constable up in a luxury spa for 6 weeks or pay a couple of hundred thousand quid into the Labour party coffers. You could argue that India has a more democratic and accessible system of corruption than UK.
(11 January 2012, 02:06PM) Complain about this comment
Phil, I think being able to name them would be a bad thing in some ways - it allows people to make false accusations etc. Nice thing about it being anon is that it shows trends and shines light on the worst areas.
Name This will be the name displayed with your comment.
Email This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.
Comment Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.
To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.
Enter the text from the box above
Remember my details
By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.
Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.
22 May 12
21 May 12
Become a smarter investor in just 3 minutes a day.
MoneyWeek is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.