Home—Blog—Had it with low bond yields? Blame the baby boomers
Jul 16, 2012, 05:10
Posted byMerryn Somerset Webb
Are US and UK sovereign bonds in a bubble? With the US ten-year Treasuries yielding a mere 1.45% and UK ten-year gilts on 1.49%, the obvious answer - and the one we usually give - is yes.
Their prices, thanks to a mixture of safe haven demand, non-stop quantitative easing (via which all excess supply is hoovered up by central banks) and financial repression, are far too high, and will at some point fall fast. That might not happen this year or next year, but it will happen. The ropey finances of the two countries makes it all but a given.
However, there is a another way of looking at this. What if bond yields have simply reverted to the mean (as most things do) and have seen a temporary over shoot? Paul Hodges of International eChem has drawn my attention to the chart below (it is based on data from the annual Barclays Equity Gilt Study).
What it shows us is that UK yields (blue) averaged 3.7% from 1900 to 1949 and have averaged 4.2% since 2000. Similarly, US yields averaged 2.7% between 1926 and 49 (no records before that) and 4.5% since 2000. “This would suggest it was the peak in the middle, between the 1970s-90s – when yields averaged more like 8-10% - that was the exception rather than the rule,” says Paul.
Paul has an explanation for this. It is, he says, all about the fact that the baby boomer super-cycle is over. I’ve looked at the effect that might have on growth in the past here: Bad news for growth: the baby-boomer super-cycle is over. But the point here is that the baby boomer rush for pension and retirement safety is another factor pushing bond prices up (and yields down).
It’s a nice idea, and there is probably a good deal of truth in the idea that falling yields are in part connected to demography. However, it doesn’t really change our current view about sovereign bonds.
Even if you assume the huge fall in yields from the highs of the 70s and 80s have had an element of mean reversion in them, and that they should be knocking around 3% - at well under 2% they have clearly gone too far in the other direction for long term investors to feel safe holding them.
Look at some more of the data from the Equity Gilt Study and you will see that investors who bought gilts at their last peak (in 1946) did not break even on their investment in real terms for 47 years. More on this here.
Published in Blog
More articles by Merryn Somerset Webb
By Merryn Somerset Webb, May 21, 2013
By Matthew Lynn, May 17, 2013
May 16, 2013
By Bengt Saelensminde, May 15, 2013
This will be the name displayed with your comment.
This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.
Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.
To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.
Enter the text from the box above
Remember my details
By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.
Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.
22 May 13
21 May 13
20 May 13
16 April BBC Radio Scotland(From 1h 45m in)
21 March Radio 4: Moneybox Live
12 March Photogallery of Merryn's talk at BAB London
Become a smarter investor in just 3 minutes a day.
MoneyWeek is not responsible for the content of external internet sites.
Copyright © MoneyWeek 1999-2013. All rights reserved.
Registered office: 8th Floor, Friars Bridge Court, 41-45 Blackfriars Road, London SE1 8NZ.Registered in England with company no. 04016750 and VAT no. GB 629 7287 94. MoneyWeek and Money Morning are registered trade marks.