Is the proposed mansion tax actually a step in the right direction?

Feb 27, 2013, 10:15

Share with
friends:

Comments (9)

While the 'guess the mansion from the hard-working family home' quiz has proved popular, there is a more serious underlying message, says Merryn Somerset Webb.

Previous blog posts on the location tax

The real motive behind a mansion tax
Location, location, location
A wealth tax on the value of property is a bad idea
A simple tweak for a better tax system
Want growth? Scrap income tax and introduce a location tax
Why I hate the mansion tax

Comments (9)

Share with
friends:

Comments

  • 1. Merryn

    (27 February 2013, 03:51PM)  Complain about this comment

    I say above that I would be happy with a mansion tax if it was explicitly recognised as a location tax and if other taxes were dropped as a result. You might say that this is what Ed M is trying to do with his idea to have a mansion tax and reinstate the 10p rate at the same time. But this is not a shift of any kind. It is just a silly complication. We don't need any more of those.

  • 2. Ellen

    (27 February 2013, 04:48PM)  Complain about this comment

    I don't understand why someone who lives in a small two bedroom flat should attract a property tax that a rolling estate, anywhere, is able to avoid. Young people and people who cannot find employment tend to go to London for work and it is very unfair to suggest they are privileged because they took the initiative to make a move anybody could do. Making first homes liable to CGT or taxing empty bedrooms would be fairer. Or, a true mansion tax, taxed by the acre.

  • 3. MichaelL

    (27 February 2013, 04:55PM)  Complain about this comment


    >Is the proposed mansion tax actually a step in the
    >right direction?
    >Mansion or hard-working family home? Take the test
    >Location, location, location
    >The real motive behind a mansion tax

    Is it really that big of a deal to most people? Probably won't affect most people (2m homes). Is it symbolic, are there better taxes? Of course, but your preaching to the converted on that one. Most people know that and don't care about taxes that only affect other people -and- have marginal impact to the wider economy.

    Just be thankful you don't work for Marissa Mayer
    (Yahoo), you'd never get to upload stuff from your mansion ... you'd be suited and booted in the office.

  • 4. MichaelL

    (27 February 2013, 04:56PM)  Complain about this comment

    @Ellen
    The point just flew past you and waved goodbye.

    " why someone who lives in a small two bedroom flat should attract a property tax that a rolling estate, anywhere, is able to avoid."

    Because even in London small 2 bedroom flats are rarely worth 2million plus.

  • 5. Banker

    (27 February 2013, 05:33PM)  Complain about this comment

    Merryn, how many pieces have you wrote on this? It kooks like you are not a financial tipster, not even political journalist but a political campaigner. Someone who pays over £2m for a dirty and tiny flat in london, in my opinion should pay mansion tax just like a Lord of a mansion if his mansion is big enougph and in good enougph location to be worth more then £2m plus stupidity/obsenities tax as it is obscene to but dirty tiny flats for £2m a go. It is something I just would not do even if I had 1bn.

  • 6. Bayard

    (27 February 2013, 05:51PM)  Complain about this comment

    IMHO, the Mansion Tax is the new AV. It's what politicans do when an idea they dislike is "gaining traction". They take the most extreme and absurd version of it that they can get away with pretending to be supporting and then, when it is shot down in flames, they can safely ditch the idea it was based on, too. AV was the death of Proportional Representation and the Mansion Tax will be the death of Location Value Tax.

  • 7. Merryn

    (28 February 2013, 09:12AM)  Complain about this comment

    I'm writing a lot on this because I am trying to explain its importance. A mansion tax is a location tax. On top of other taxes this is bad. If we used this conversation to shift our tax base entirely to one based on land location not income it might be very good. The mansion tax seems like a tiny political row involving only the rich. I suspect it is a great deal more than that.

  • 8. Boris Macdonut

    (28 February 2013, 07:29PM)  Complain about this comment

    #7 Merryn. The First World War was a "tiny political row involving only the rich",unfortunately many innocents had to be embroiled. The mansion tax is about fairness.

  • 9. James

    (04 March 2013, 10:02PM)  Complain about this comment

    Thanks for emphasising this point Merryn. I totally agree with you that this is basically a location tax, or land tax. I would love to see land taxes and consumption taxes introduced INSTEAD of capital gains taxes and income taxes. They are much fairer systems.

    PS - I could listen to you talk forever - you have a lovely voice!

Leave a comment

This will be the name displayed with your comment.

This helps us verify comments are genuine. It will not be displayed anywhere on the site and is stored confidentially.

Please keep your comment within 1,000 characters and relevant to the main topic. We encourage healthy debate, but we don't allow insults or bad language. Anything off topic or unpleasant, we'll remove. Enjoy the conversation! Thank you.

captcha To prevent spam-related comments please enter the characters shown in the 'Captcha' box to the left.

By leaving a comment you accept our terms and conditions.


FREE - MoneyWeek's daily investment emailJohn Stepek

Our free daily email, Money Morning, is an informative and enjoyable analysis of what's going on in the markets. Written by our Editor, John Stepek, and guest contributors.
Sign up FREE to Money Morning here.

>